Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Research on Micro-Project-Based Python Programming Practice Teaching Reform Driven by Large AI Models

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/autml.2026.070118 | Downloads: 1 | Views: 18

Author(s)

Renjie Lv 1, Jing Zhang 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Information and Intelligence Engineering, University of Sanya, Sanya, China

Corresponding Author

Renjie Lv

ABSTRACT

The widespread application of large AI models has brought dual impacts on Python programming education: while enhancing learning convenience, it has also intensified students' cognitive dependence and weakened their practical programming abilities. This study constructs and implements a "micro-project-based practice teaching model driven by large AI models," decomposing course content into logically progressive micro-projects and integrating human–AI collaboration mechanisms with process-oriented evaluation. A total of 52 students participated in a one-semester teaching experiment. The results show that the average score increased from 68.5 to 79.2, the proportion of high-achieving students rose from 12% to 31%, classroom interaction rate improved from 41.5% to 78.6%, and the proportion of AI-generated code directly used decreased from 72.4% to 38.7%. Furthermore, this study establishes a competency development model and a human–AI collaboration efficiency model, with a model fitting coefficient of R2=0.87 and a 54.7% improvement in learning efficiency. The findings provide both theoretical support and practical guidance for programming education reform in the AI era, and offer a replicable framework for integrating AI technologies into foundational programming curricula.

KEYWORDS

Large AI Models; Python Teaching; Micro-Project-Based Learning; Competency Development Model; Human–AI Collaboration

CITE THIS PAPER

Renjie Lv, Jing Zhang. Research on Micro-Project-Based Python Programming Practice Teaching Reform Driven by Large AI Models. Automation and Machine Learning (2026). Vol. 7, No. 1, 143-149. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/autml.2026.070118.

REFERENCES

[1] Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson. 
[2] Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. 
[3] Van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. L. (2009). Python 3 reference manual. CreateSpace. 
[4] Guzdial, M. (2015). Learner-centered design of computing education. Morgan & Claypool. 
[5] Zawacki-Richter, O., et al. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. 
[6] Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. 
[7] Finnie-Ansley, J., et al. (2022). The robots are coming: Exploring the implications of OpenAI Codex on introductory programming. ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 
[8] Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. 
[9] Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. McGraw-Hill. 
[10] Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. 
[11] Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 
[12] Aiken, R. M. (1979). Intelligent tutoring systems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 3(4), 251–277. 
[13] Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59. 
[14] Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020). Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(3), e1355. 
[15] Becker, S. A., et al. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition. EDUCAUSE.

Downloads: 5209
Visits: 261688

Sponsors, Associates, and Links


All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.