Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Sustainable Development of Higher Legal Education in China: in the Perspective of Educational Psychology

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/curtm.2022.050907 | Downloads: 18 | Views: 761

Author(s)

Shiyong Song 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Political Science and Law, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan, Shandong, China

Corresponding Author

Shiyong Song

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to solve the problem that China’s higher law education should change from a teacher-centered teaching mode to a student-centered teaching mode, and take students' psychological identity and behavior integration as the goal to achieve sustainable development. The author puts forward the teaching model of "school teachers + students + practical tutors", that is, the "1+1+1" teaching model of "student-centered, theoretical and practical teachers as teaching service providers". This paper is analyzed by the method of comparative methodology, data study and practice demonstration. Unique advantage of China's Higher Legal Education Institutes (HLEI) is Marxist College of every university. Marxist Colleges ensure the country's unified political direction and political belief within each university.

KEYWORDS

sustainability, higher law education, educational psychology, 1+1+1, student-centered Introduction

CITE THIS PAPER

Shiyong Song, Sustainable Development of Higher Legal Education in China: in the Perspective of Educational Psychology. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology (2022) Vol. 5: 37-44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2022.050907.

REFERENCES

[1] Knox, J. (2020) Artificial Intelligence and Education in China. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 298-311.
[2] Barth, M. (2013) Many Roads Lead to Sustainability: A Process-Oriented Analysis of Change in Higher Education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(2), 160-175.
[3] Miotto, G., Del-Castillo-Feito, C. and Blanco-González, A. (2020) Reputation and Legitimacy: Key Factors for Higher Education Institutions’ Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Business Research, 112, 342-353.
[4] Jucker, R. (2012) The Sustainable Self: A Personal Approach to Sustainability Education. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 6(1), 157-158.
[5] Wright, T. (2010) University Presidents' Conceptualizations of Sustainability in Higher Education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(1), 61-73.
[6] Barth, M. (2013) Many Roads Lead to Sustainability: A Process-Oriented Analysis of Change in Higher Education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(2), 160-175.
[7] Lozano, R., Lozano, F.J., Mulder, K., Huisingh, D. and Waas, T. (2013) Advancing Higher Education for Sustainable Development: International Insights and Critical Reflections. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 3-9.
[8] Wright, T. (2010) University Presidents' Conceptualizations of Sustainability in Higher Education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(1), 61-73.
[9] Maisel, P. (2006) Expanding and sustaining clinical legal education in developing countries: What we can Learn from South Africa. Fordham Int’l LJ, 30, 374. (Accessed Jul 9, 2022.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.