Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Construction of the Evaluation System of Classroom Practice Teaching in Colleges and Universities Driven by 5G Network Communication Technology

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/aetp.2023.071607 | Downloads: 15 | Views: 211

Author(s)

Zhigang Guo 1,2

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Education, Philippine Women's University, Ermita Manila, Metro Manila, Philippine
2 Department of Culture and Creativity, Yantai Vocational College of Culture and Tourism, Yantai, Shandong, China

Corresponding Author

Zhigang Guo

ABSTRACT

As higher education reform continues to progress, university classrooms are making continuous efforts to cultivate well-rounded and high-quality talents. In order to follow the path of socialist modernization with Chinese characteristics and implement the national quality education policy, improving practical teaching and its teaching evaluation is a major breakthrough to realize the construction of the road of higher education reform. The importance of practical teaching can be imagined as an irreplaceable teaching link in the teaching process. In particular, under the current situation of education reform, classroom teaching practice has gradually been emphasized. In the past, more attention was paid to students' mastery of theoretical knowledge, while the requirements of modern teaching quality for college classroom no longer stay at the level of theoretical teaching. However, the modern college classroom does not really combine teaching with happiness and classroom with action. For the evaluation of practical teaching, there are also a series of problems. In order to optimize the teaching evaluation system and truly integrate the classroom into practice, this paper introduced 5G network communication technology and conducted a comparative experiment. The teachers and students of the experimental class jointly scored the classroom practice teaching evaluation system before and after the experiment. The experimental data showed that the teachers and students' rating of the evaluation subject has risen from 4.3 to 8.3; the score of the evaluation index rose from 5.6 to 9.1; the change of scoring results can show the satisfaction of teachers and students with 5G network communication technology. On this basis, an interview survey was conducted. The survey results showed that after the introduction of 5G network communication technology, the evaluation indicators were more optimized and the evaluation process became more scientific. The proposed research provided a value of reference for the construction of classroom practice teaching evaluation system in universities driven by 5G network communication technology and provided a direction for the future development of practice teaching evaluation.

KEYWORDS

5G Network Communication Technology, Classroom Practice Teaching, Teaching Evaluation, Evaluation System

CITE THIS PAPER

Zhigang Guo, Construction of the Evaluation System of Classroom Practice Teaching in Colleges and Universities Driven by 5G Network Communication Technology. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology (2023) Vol. 7: 52-62. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2023.071607.

REFERENCES

[1] Korthagen F A J. Making teacher education relevant for practice: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Orbis scholae, 2018, 5(2): 31-50.
[2] Gess-Newsome J, Taylor J A, Carlson J. Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 2019, 41(7): 944-963.
[3] Poulou M S, Reddy L A, Dudek C M. Relation of teacher self-efficacy and classroom practices: A preliminary investigation. School Psychology International, 2019, 40(1): 25-48.
[4] Kaymakamoglu S E. Teachers' Beliefs, Perceived Practice and Actual Classroom Practice in Relation to Traditional (Teacher-Centered) and Constructivist (Learner-Centered) Teaching (Note 1). Journal of Education and Learning, 2018, 7(1): 29-37.
[5] Sadaf A, Johnson B L. Teachers’ beliefs about integrating digital literacy into classroom practice: An investigation based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 2017, 33(4): 129-137.
[6] Barendsen E, Henze I. Relating teacher PCK and teacher practice using classroom observation. Research in Science Education, 2019, 49(5): 1141-1175.
[7] Andersson C, Palm T. Reasons for teachers' successful development of a formative assessment practice through professional development–a motivation perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2018, 25(6): 576-597.
[8] Xue G, Lingling L. A comparative study on cooperative learning in multimedia and network environment used by English majors between China Mainland and Taiwan. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 2018, 9(1): 127-135.
[9] Almutairi T S, Shraid N S. Teacher Evaluation by Different Internal Evaluators: Head of Departments, Teachers Themselves, Peers and Students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 2021, 10(2): 588-596.
[10] Stroebe W. Student evaluations of teaching encourages poor teaching and contributes to grade inflation: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2020, 42(4): 276-294. 
[11] Dincer S. Are preservice teachers really literate enough to integrate technology in their classroom practice? Determining the technology literacy level of preservice teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 2018, 23(6): 2699-2718.
[12] Pisarov J, Mester G. The impact of 5G technology on life in 21st century. IPSI BgD Transactions on Advanced Research (TAR), 2020, 16(2): 11-14.
[13] Eze K G, Sadiku M N O, Musa S M. 5G wireless technology: A primer. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology, 2018, 7(7): 62-64.
[14] Wu Q, Li Y, Chen W. An overview of sustainable green 5G networks. IEEE wireless communications, 2017, 24(4): 72-80.
[15] Macias Estevao. Design and Implementation of Intelligent Fault Diagnosis System for Construction Machinery Supporting Wireless Communication Network. Kinetic Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 1(3): 17-24.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.