Author(s)

Hao Zhang ^1,2

Affiliation(s)

¹ Lyceum of the Philippines University–Batangas, Capital Site, Batangas City, 4200, Philippines
² Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China

Corresponding Author

Hao Zhang

ABSTRACT

Layered teaching mode is applied to ESP classes to meet the various demands of students as well as solving professional problems. It is also connected to English learning self-efficacy. Quantitative correlational research was employed in the study, which studies the relationship between two variables. This study selected 300 college students from three universities in Anhui Province in China by the questionnaire survey method, which was adapted from other researchers and sent to students online through Wenjuanxing. The study showed that students' overall satisfaction with the evaluation of layered teaching is relatively high, but the teaching contents are single, and teaching materials are not updated in time. Students' English self-efficacy motivation is very strong, but their English skills are relatively lacking. A highly significant correlation has been illustrated between the two variables. The better the layered teaching mode is, the better English learning self-efficacy is.

KEYWORDS

Layered Teaching Mode, English Learning Self-efficacy, ESP

CITE THIS PAPER

Hao Zhang, Study on the Relationship between Layered Teaching Mode and Self efficacy of English Learning in Chinese English for Specific Purposes Class. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology (2023) Vol. 7: 52-62. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2023.071506.

REFERENCES

[1] Aydoğuş, R., & Ocak, G. (2011). Effect to academic achievement of using layered curriculum in primary schools' 6th and 7th degree science lesson. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 9(2), 343–368.
[2] Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior. New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman). 4: 71-81.
[3] Bao, D.G., Zheng Y. X., & Zhang M. (2023). The Current Situation and Future Prospects of Teacher Evaluation in China's Higher Vocational Education. Journal of Xingtai Vocational and Technical College, 40(01): 35-38+46.
[4] Cai, J. G. (2015). Review, Problems and Tasks of ESP Teaching Development in China. Journal of Xi'an International Studies University, 23(1):68-72.
[5] Chao C. (2021). Visual Analysis of Evaluation Research of Chinese University Teachers Based on CiteSpace. Continuing Education Research, (09):25-30.
[6] Chen, X. H. (2017). Research on English Translation and Teaching Innovation. World Book Publishing Company, (09), 136.
[7] Chen, Y. D. (2021). Research on the Reform of College Teacher Evaluation in the New Era from the Perspective of Teacher Development. China Adult Education, (19): 24-27.
[8] Cui, X. L., Li C. (2019). International Dynamics of ESP Research and Its Visual Analysis, Journal of Yanbian University (Social Science Edition), 1(52), 118-119.
[9] D. Gardner & M. Davies. (2014). A New Academic Vocabulary List. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 305-327.
[10] Dong, J. H., & Wu H. (2018). Exploring the Effectiveness of ESP Teaching Based on Corpus, Heilongjiang Education, 2, 47.
[11] Feng, Z. J., & Wang F. (2016). Construction Conception and Teaching Application of Financial English News Corpus. Foreign Language Audio-visual Teaching, (4), 54-58.
[12] Gencel, İ. E., & Saracaloğlu, A. S. (2018). The effect of layered curriculum on reflective thinking and on self-directed learning readiness of prospective teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(1), 8–20.
[13] Gong, Q. Z. (2023). Academic Career in Matrix Structure: A New Framework for Evaluation of University Teachers——Based on a Case Study of Paris-Saclay University. Chinese Higher Education Research, (01):93-100.
[14] Gong, Q. Z. (2023). Inheritance and Transformation: A Study on the Evaluation System of French University Teachers. Foreign Education Research, 50(01): 113-128.
[15] Gu, Q. Y. (2021). Japan's New Teacher Evaluation System and Its Enlightenment to my country. World Education Information, 34(10):61-66.
[16] Huang, Y., & Wang Y. (2022). Construction of Open University Teacher Evaluation System Based on Teacher Development. Journal of Inner Mongolia Radio and TV University, (05):96-102.
[17] Hu, J. P. et al. (2022).The Reform and System Construction of University Teacher Evaluation in the New Era. Office Business, (15): 147-149.
[18] Jiang, H. (2022). Evaluation of College Teachers from the Perspective of High-Quality Education System. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition), 24(02):22-27.
[19] Kang, Z. (2022). Paths to Improve Teachers' Evaluation Literacy in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Science and Education Wenhui, (14): 16-20.
[20] Keyser, V., & Barling, J. (1981). Determinants of children's self-efficacy beliefs in an academic environment. Cognitive Theory and Research, 5, 29-40. 
[21] Kong, D. Y., & Zhang C. M. (2022). The Construction and Application of Teacher Evaluation Index System of Applied Technology University. Vocational and Technical Education, 43(08):70-74.
[22] Liu, C. H. (2021). Criticism and Improvement: Correction of American Teacher Evaluation Thought and Practice in the 21st Century. Teacher Education Research, 33(04):115-121.
[23] Liu, H., & Ren, Y. (2022). Reflection and Reconstruction of Applied University Teacher Evaluation System. Journal of Hefei University (Comprehensive Edition), 39(03):125-129.
[24] Liu X. L. et al. (2022). Reform and Enlightenment of American Teacher Evaluation under Neoliberalism. Teaching and Management, (27): 105-108.
[25] Long, D. Y. (2022). Research on the Development Elements of Foreign Language Teachers' Evaluation Literacy. Journal of North China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 22(03):109-114.
[26] Luo, Y. (2021). Development-Oriented Research on Teacher Evaluation in Higher Vocational Colleges. Journal of Jiujiang Vocational and Technical College, (04):64-70.
[27] Niu, F. R. (2022). The Reform Dilemma and Tensions of the Teacher Evaluation System in Colleges and Universities. Journal of the National Academy of Educational Administration, (04):52-60.
[28] Niu, F. R. (2023). Under the background of "breaking the five values", the conflict and optimization path of university teachers' evaluation of multiple dimensions. Modern Education Science, (02):21-26.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Curriculum and Teaching Methodology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education
  
  
• Adult and Higher Education