Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Media and Communication Research
  4. Vol 4, Issue 7, 2023

Social Media Censorship: Overprotected Platforms and Legal Liability

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/mediacr.2023.040710 | Downloads: 34 | Views: 515

Author(s)

Zhen Zeng 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Yunnan College of Business Management, Kunming, Yunnan, 650304, China

Corresponding Author

Zhen Zeng

ABSTRACT

In the wake of sustained efforts to combat abusive behaviour on social media platforms, it has been demanded that social media companies take greater responsibility for the safety of their users. A piece of a piece of legislation (The Online Safety Bill) was announced by the UK government in 2022 with the aim of creating a safer online environment and protecting users from harmful content. This article critically assesses the extent to which social media platforms are overprotected in contemporary society, and whether current regulations are sufficient solutions to the issues around online harms and abhorrent content. A comparative perspective of various media law systems is provided to explore the legal regulations, jurisprudential norms, and societal impacts of different legal systems on the media. The regulation of social media platforms is a complex issue that has sparked debate over the balance between protecting speech rights and preventing abusive behaviour. However, it is not as simple as a binary choice between statutory oversight and unregulated speech, as moderation laws can be too rigid or too vague and may lead to over-censorship or over-protection. There is a need to refine clear boundaries for content governance and liability exemption, while maintaining the original intentions of legislation, aligned with an ethic approach. 

KEYWORDS

Social media, online harms, platform regulation, free speech, censorship, online safety Bill

CITE THIS PAPER

Zhen Zeng, Social Media Censorship: Overprotected Platforms and Legal Liability. Media and Communication Research (2023) Vol. 4: 74-79. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/mediacr.2023.040710.

REFERENCES

[1] Kenton, W. (2022) What Is Web 2.0? Definition, Impact, and Examples. Available at: https://www. investopedia. com/ terms/w/web-20.asp (accessed 31 December 2022).
[2] Trengove, M., Kazim, E., Almeida, D., Hilliard, A., Zannone, S. and Lomas, E. (2022) A critical review of the Online Safety Bill. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100544 (accessed 7 January 2023).
[3] A guide to the Online Safety Bill (2022) Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/a-guide-to-the-online-safety-bill?gclid=CjwKCAiA5Y6eBhAbEiwA_2ZWISCAXiWQRQwnF6UbaMefeQITMOLUk5qv3qQSKvxJNaJmkVn77X_CtBoCEYoQAvD_BwE (accessed 12 January 2023). 
[4] Gillespie, T. (2018) Custodians of the Internet. New Haven: Yale University Press.
[5] Price, L. (2021) 'Platform responsibility for online harms: towards a duty of care for online hazards', The journal of media law, 13(2), 238–261.
[6] Jennes, I., Pierson, J. and Van den Broeck, W. (2014) 'User Empowerment and Audience Commodification in a Commercial Television Context', The Journal of Media Innovations, 1(1), 70–85.
[7] Burns, H. (2021) Online Abuse: Why Management Liability isn't The Answer? Available at: https://www. openrightsgroup.org/blog/online-abuse-why-management-liability-isnt-the-answer/ (accessed 8 January 2023).
[8] Canadian Centre for Child Protection Supports UK’s Online Safety Bill (2021) Available at: https:// protectchildren. ca/en/ press-and-media/news-releases/2021/uk-online-safety-bill (accessed 10 January 2023).
[9] Carpentier, N., Schroder, K.C., and Hallett, L. (2013) Audience Transformations: Shifting Audience Positions in Late Modernity. New York: Routledge.
[10] Thornton, A.L. (2001) Does the Internet create democracy? Ecquid Novi, 22(2), 126-147.
[11] Harvard Law Review (2018) 'Section 230 As First Amendment Rule', Harvard law review, 131(7), 2027–2048.
[12] Dimitroff, K. (2021) ‘Mark zuckerberg, joe manchin, and isis: What facebook's international terrorism lawsuits can teach us about the future of section 230 reform’, Texas law review, 100(1), 153–188.
[13] Lawrence, K. (2021) ALL RED ALL EQUAL Man Utd launch huge anti-social media abuse campaign 'See Red' and urge use of online reporting system to combat it. Available at: https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/14529260/man-utd-see-red-anti-social-media-abuse-campaign/ (accessed 11 January 2023).
[14] Goldman, E. (2020) Facebook Doesn't Have a Duty to Prevent a Murder–Godwin v. Facebook. Available at: https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/10/facebook-doesnt-have-duty-to-prevent-a-murder-godwin-v-facebook.htm (accessed 10 January 2023).
[15] Platform Responsibility Reform: Observation on Amendments to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of the United States (2020) Available at: https://www.secrss.com/articles/26591 (accessed 9 January 2023).
[16] Johnson, L. (2022) Online Safety Bill, Remaining Stages, House of Commons, 5 December 2022. Available at: https://www.local.gov.uk/parliament/briefings-and-responses/online-safety-bill-remaining-stages-house-commons-5-december (accessed 6 January 2023).
[17] Coe, P. (2021) 'Misinformation, disinformation, the Online Safety Bill, and its insidious implications for free speech', Communications law (Haywards Heath, England), 26(3), 127-129. 

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.