Author(s)

Fan Yang ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ School of Foreign Languages, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030006, China

Corresponding Author

Fan Yang

ABSTRACT

Based on the doctor-patient interaction corpus of the American TV series House M.D. (Season 1), this thesis analyzes the identity construction of doctors in the doctor-patient conversation from the perspective of interpersonal pragmatics, combined with the interpersonal function in systemic functional linguistics, in order to reveal the significance and mechanism of multiple identity construction. The author classifies the identity of doctors in medical process into three categories by collecting, classifying and analyzing the data of TV series. The first one is the authority identity, which is constructed by using technical terms, modal verbs or the imperative mood. The second is the friend identity, which is constructed by chatting with the patient easily or addressing the patient more closely. The third category is the listener identity, and its construction mainly through repetition or approval of the patient’s attitude. This study finds that by constructing multiple identities, doctors can meet the diverse needs of patients and ease the relationship between doctors and patients. Under the medical background, the mechanism of the construction of doctor's discourse identity can be explained from the principle of interpersonal pragmatics in the identity construction, including the Social Constructivism Principle, the Positionality Principle, the Relationality Principle and the Indexicality Principle.

KEYWORDS

Interpersonal function; doctor-patient conversation; identity construction; the principle of Interpersonal Pragmatics; House M.D

CITE THIS PAPER

Fan Yang, The Study on the Doctor's Identity Construction in Doctor-Patient Conversation from the Perspective of Interpersonal Function and Interpersonal Pragmatics. Lecture Notes on Language and Literature (2023) Vol. 6: 93-103. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/langl.2023.061315.

REFERENCES

[1] Locher M A, Graham S L. Introduction to interpersonal pragmatics [J]. 2010.
[2] Bousfield D. Researching impoliteness and rudeness: Issues and definitions [J]. Interpersonal pragmatics, 2010, 6: 101-134.
[3] Okamoto S. Politeness in east Asia [J]. Interpersonal pragmatics, 2010: 71-100.
[4] Sifianou M. Linguistic politeness: Laying the foundations [J]. Interpersonal pragmatics, 2010: 17-41.
[5] Watts R J. Linguistic politeness theory and its aftermath: Recent research trails[J]. Interpersonal pragmatics, 2010, 6: 43-70.
[6] Arundale R. B. Face as a research focus in interpersonal pragmatics: Relational and emic perspectives [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2013, (58).
[7] Kádár D. Z. & Bax M. In-group ritual and relational work [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2013, (58): 73-86.
[8] Li Chengtuan, Ran Xinping. A Survey of Identity Construction Within Interpersonal Pragmatics: Its Present State, Theoretical Principles and New Directions[J]. Foreign Languages in China. 2015(2):47-54.
[9] Li Chengtuan, Ran Xinping. An Interpersonal Pragmatic Account of Professional Identity. [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages. 2017(06):2-11.
[10] Liu Ping. Relational Turn of Pragmatics-Interpersonal Pragmatics: Research Scope, Objectives and Methodology [J]. Foreign Language Research. 2017(05):20-25.
[11] He Ziran. Interpersonal pragmatics: A study of interpersonal relationship with language[J]. Foreign Language Education. 2018(06):1-6.
[12] Foucault M. The Archaeology of Knowledge [M]. London: Vintage Books. 1972.
[13] Butler J. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection [M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 1997.
[14] Gu Y. G. Doctor-patient interaction as goal-directed discourse [J]. Journal of Asian-Pacific Communication, 1996(3): 156-176.
[15] Jiang J. The use of maxims for cooperation in Chinese medical interview [J]. Journal of Health Communication, 1999(3):215-222.
[16] Zhao B. B. Asymmetry and mitigation in Chinese medical interview [J]. Health Commun, 1999(3): 209-214.
[17] Caldas-Coulthard C. R. & Iedema R. Identity Trouble: Critical Discourse and Contested Identities [M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2008.
[18] Fairclough N. Discourse and Social Change [M]. Cambridge: Polity Press. 1992.
[19] Verschueren, J. Understanding Pragmatics [M]. London: Edward Arnold Ttd. 1999.
[20] Chen Xinren. Pragmatic Explorations in Identity and Communication [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press. 2013.
[21] Jiang Xiaohong, Zhou Rong. Multiple perspectives of Pragmatics-Review of the 11th International Gragmatics Society [J]. Modern Foreign Languages. 2009(4):434-435.
[22] Sun Qiyao, Wang Ning. On Interpersonal Meaning of Deontic Modality in the Pragmatics Identity Construction [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press. 2015.
[23] Xin Bin. Critical Linguistics and the Critical Analysis of English News [J]. Foreign Language Education. 2000(04): 44-48.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
  
  
• Information and Knowledge Management
  
  
• Military and Armament Science
  
  
• Media and Communication Research
  
  
• Journal of Human Movement Science
  
  
• Art and Performance Letters
  
  
• Lecture Notes on History
  
  
• Philosophy Journal
  
  
• Science of Law Journal
  
  
• Journal of Political Science Research
  
  
• Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
  
  
• Advances in Broadcasting