Author(s)

Lingling Chen ¹, Weiwei Huang ¹, Xiaoqi Yang ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ College of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Liuzhou Institute of Technology, Liuzhou, China

Corresponding Author

Xiaoqi Yang

ABSTRACT

The architectural design course is a core component of the architecture major. In order to break through traditional teaching methods and enhance students’ practical application abilities, it is necessary to conduct in-depth research on the "student-centered" approach in the context of Internet+ and utilize internet resources and platforms for innovation and reform in architectural design courses. This article explores the establishment of reform objectives, including knowledge objectives, skill objectives, and quality objectives, as well as innovative teaching methods, instructional design, practical teaching, process evaluation, high-quality courses, and extracurricular activities. Based on the optimization theory of architectural design courses and innovative reforms in practical teaching, the aim is to cultivate innovative and practical talents with strong application and design abilities.

KEYWORDS

Internet +, architectural design courses, innovation, reform, research

CITE THIS PAPER

Lingling Chen, Weiwei Huang, Xiaoqi Yang, Research on Innovative Reform of Architectural Design Courses in the Context of Internet+. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology (2023) Vol. 6: 108-112. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2023.061614.

REFERENCES

[1] Zhu G. T. (2020). Exploring the reform of public building design courses with a "student-centered" approach: A case study of the "Public Building Design 1" course at Guangdong Baiyun University. Education and Teaching Forum, 492(46):190-191. 
[2] Gao L., & Peng W. Y. (2019). Research on the reform of blended teaching mode based on the "Preliminary Architectural Design" course. Doors and Windows, (12):296. 
[3] Wang W., Hu C., & Dai H. (2021). Empirical study on teaching innovation of architectural design courses in the background of "Internet +". Journal of Innovation and Enterprise Education, 12(03):60-65. 
[4] Shi M. L., Zeng X., & Han X. J. (2023). Teaching innovation practice of "vertical excavation, horizontal comparison, and multi-directional selection": A case study of the "Architectural Design" course for second-year architecture students. Anhui Architecture, 30(01):121-123. 
[5] Liu X. X., Ma J., & Liang F. (2020). A Probe into the Reform of Mixed Teaching Theory in the Course Teaching of Architectural Design. Education and Teaching Forum, 477(31):260-261. 
[6] Zhuang J. Y., Sun J., & Zhang L. (2021). On the teaching reform of Architectural Design course with the cultivation of practical and innovative ability as the core. Shanxi Architecture, 47(11):183-184+198. 
[7] Cao M. Q., Wen L., & Li Y. B. (2022). Innovation and Practice of Architectural Design Curriculum System in Higher Vocational Colleges under the Background of BIM Driven, "Trinity" and Collaborative Education. Vocational Technology, 21(05):96-101. 
[8] Chen L. L. (2023). Reform and practice of the innovative CDIO curriculum system for architectural design core courses in local universities based on the PBL concept. Shanxi Youth, No. 646(09):6-9. 
[9] Chen Y. Y. (2020). Exploration of innovative classroom teaching in architectural design foundation courses: A case study of the preliminary architectural design course at Anhui Jianzhu University. Education and Teaching Forum, No. 482(36): 165-167. 
[10] Chen D., & Liu S. (2021). Research on the reform of interior design practice courses based on the "project"-oriented CDIO model. Journal of Social Science of Jiamusi University, 39(03):229-231.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education
  
  
• Adult and Higher Education