Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Research on the Differences of Classroom Teaching between Expert Teacher and Preservice Teacher

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/aduhe.2023.051419 | Downloads: 12 | Views: 337

Author(s)

Ting Li 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang, 524048, China

Corresponding Author

Ting Li

ABSTRACT

The quality video open course displays the advanced teaching idea, unique teaching method and rich teaching achievements of the outstanding expert teachers in our country. The research uses the Flanders interactive analysis system and Nvivo analysis software, and takes the classroom teaching video of expert teachers and pre-service teachers as the research object, analyzes and studies teacher-student interaction behavior, teaching question design, and teaching emotions, to explore the gap of Classroom Teaching between expert teacher and preservice teacher, to find directions for improvement and improvement. Research shows that the main gap between expert teachers and pre-service teachers lies in question design and teaching emotions.

KEYWORDS

Quality open video course, teacher-student interaction behavior, teaching question design, teaching emotion

CITE THIS PAPER

Ting Li, Research on the Differences of Classroom Teaching between Expert Teacher and Preservice Teacher. Adult and Higher Education (2023) Vol. 5: 101-106. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aduhe.2023.051419.

REFERENCES

[1] Xu Yinbo, Xu Xiaofang. (2016) Inspiration of MOOC on the Construction of National Quality Open Course Ware. Chongqing Higher Education Research, (5): 102-108.
[2] Xie Youru, Wang Qinlei, Peng Lili and Li Guanjie. (2013) Research on teaching Characteristics and Behaviors of teachers and students of high-quality open video courses. Audio-visual Education Research, (10): 90-96.
[3] Zhang Ludan, Wang Ying and Pan Yuxia. (2011) A case study on classroom teaching characteristics of information Technology expert teachers. Audio-visual Education Research, (7): 83-88.
[4] Chen Zhenguo, Deng Zhiwen, Yu Guangyin and Li Sheng. (2014) A Study on the Interactions Between Students and Teachers in 'Flip Classroom' Based on FIAS Analysis Model: A Cast Study of High School Physics Class. Global Education, 9: 21-33.
[5] Wu Xiaopeng, Zhang Yi and Peng Naixia. (2016) Research on Classroom Teaching Evaluation Based on FIAS and PPE Theories. E-Education Research, 11: 93-99.
[6] Liu Xiangyong, Li Aoxue, Fu Yining, Jiang Peiwen and Wang Ping. Analysis of Teacher-student Interactions in Primary English Classroom Based on Electronic Schoolbag: Taking Unit "How Are You?" as An Example. E-Education Research, 2018, 8: 97-102.
[7] Liu Xiaorong. Study on Normal Teaching Case of Young Chemistry Teacher in Junior High School Base on Flanders Interaction Analysis System. Chinese Journal of Chemical Education, 2020, 23: 46-53.
[8] Huang Faliang, Yangqian, Bi Yingzhou, Mo Yunjia, Xiong Dongchun and Wu Lanna. (2022) Teachers' Classroom Questioning Based on Deep Learning. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 9: 43-50.
[9] Chen Lin. (2022) Potential and Realization of "Optimizing Teaching with Emotion" in Ideological and Political Theory Courses. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences), 6:138-145.
[10] Wu Chenbing. (2023) Connotation, Characteristics and Value of Teacher Teaching Language. Research in Teaching, 1: 34-40.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.