Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

The Theoretical Explanations of Cognitive Failures in Daily Life

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/appep.2023.040506 | Downloads: 13 | Views: 457

Author(s)

Yue Hu 1, Hai Huang 2

Affiliation(s)

1 Student Mental Health and Counseling Center, Sichuan International Studies University, Chongqing, 400031, China
2 Research Center for Psychological and Health Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China

Corresponding Author

Yue Hu

ABSTRACT

People in daily life often show some behavior errors. For example, you are in the familiar street on the wrong direction, these phenomena that cognitive-based mistakes on simple tasks that a person normally should be capable of completing without error are known as cognitive failures. We summarize the four main theoretical explanations about cognitive failure: perceptual load theory, executive-attention theory, overload theory and complaint hypothesis. The purpose of this study is to provide some inspirations and references for the follow-up study.

KEYWORDS

Cognitive Failure; Executive-attention; Overload Theory; Complaint Hypothesis

CITE THIS PAPER

Yue Hu, Hai Huang, The Theoretical Explanations of Cognitive Failures in Daily Life. Applied & Educational Psychology (2023) Vol. 4: 28-32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/appep.2023.040506.

REFERENCES

[1] Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88(1), 1-15.
[2] Broadbent, D. D. E., Cooper, P. F., Fitzgerald, P., & Parkes, K. R. (1982). The cognitive failures questionnaire (cfq) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21 (Pt 1)(1), 1-16.
[3] Matthews, G., Coyle, K., & Craig, A. (1990). Multiple factors of cognitive failure and their relationships with stress vulnerability. Journal of Psychopathology & Behavioral Assessment, 12(1), 49-65.
[4] Doorn, R. R. A. V., Lang, J. W. B., & Weijters, T. (2010). Self-reported cognitive failures: a core self-evaluation?. Personality & Individual Differences, 49(7), 717-722.
[5] Unsworth, N., Mcmillan, B. D., Brewer, G. A., & Spillers, G. J. (2012). Everyday attention failures: an individual differences investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 38(38), 1765-1772.
[6] Lapierre, L. M., Hammer, L. B., Truxillo, D. M., & Murphy, L. A. (2012). Family interference with work and workplace cognitive failure: the mitigating role of recovery experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior,81(2), 227–235.
[7] Kane, M. J., Brown, L. H., Mcvay, J. C., Silvia, P. J., Myingermeys, I., & Kwapil, T. R. (2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when: an experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18(7), 614-621.
[8] Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 21(3), 451-468.
[9] Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2007). High perceptual load makes everybody equal: eliminating individual differences in distractibility with load.Psychological Science, 18(5), 377-381.
[10] Head, J., & Helton, W. S. (2014). Sustained attention failures are primarily due to sustained cognitive load not task monotony. Acta Psychologica, 153(153), 87-94.
[11] Wilhelm, O., Witth Ft, M., & Schipolowski, S. (2010). Self-reported cognitive failures: competing measurement models and self-report correlates. Journal of Individual Differences, 31(1), 1-14.
[12] Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2003). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control.Psychology of Learning & Motivation, 44(03), 145-199.
[13] Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., Catale, C., & D'Argembeau, A. (2014). Relationships between mind-wandering and attentional control abilities in young adults and adolescents. Acta Psychologica, 148(5), 25-36.
[14] Rast, P., Zimprich, D., Van, B. M., & Jolles, J. (2009). Factor structure and measurement invariance of the cognitive failures questionnaire across the adult life span. Assessment, 16(2), 145-158.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.