A Review of Radiotelephony Communication Phraseology Standards and Implications
DOI: 10.23977/langl.2023.060505 | Downloads: 10 | Views: 402
Author(s)
Huani Chen 1, Shan Wei 1, Xue Meng 1
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Foreign Languages, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Nanchang Street, Guanghan, China
Corresponding Author
Huani ChenABSTRACT
The use of non-standard radiotelephony communication phraseology is a major barrier to effective communication between pilots and air traffic controllers, and is one of the contributing factors of air-ground miscommunications. Therefore, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and many national civil aviation authorities have established radiotelephony communication phraseology standards to improve the safety of aviation communication. However, with the development of civil aviation, some problems were revealed in the application of the standard radiotelephony communication phraseology in flight operation. This paper compares and analyses the domestic and international standards of radiotelephony communication phraseology, and provides implications on how to optimize the radiotelephony communication phraseology standards to enhance the efficiency of air-ground communication by taking into account the changes in the radiotelephony communications.
KEYWORDS
Radiotelephony communication, ICAO standards, standard phraseology, aviation safety, miscommunicationCITE THIS PAPER
Huani Chen, Shan Wei, Xue Meng, A Review of Radiotelephony Communication Phraseology Standards and Implications. Lecture Notes on Language and Literature (2023) Vol. 6: 30-35. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/langl.2023.060505.
REFERENCES
[1] Guan Bo, (2003) on the improvement of ATC regulations from the perspective of land-air calls. China Civil Aviation, 8, 64-67.
[2] Huang Dexian. (2004) Characteristics and translation of English for civil aviation land and air calls. China Science and Technology Translation, 4, 14-16+46.
[3] Huang DY et al. The Civil Aviation International Airline Flight English Practical Talk. Beijing: China Civil Aviation Publishing, 2015.
[4] Huang DY, Wu Tuxing. (2005) Analysis of Flight Accidents Caused by Civil Aviation English Communication Failures. Journal of Civil Aviation Flight Academy of China, 1, 46-49.
[5] Pan Weijun, Wu Quan, Chen Huaqun, Luo Xiaoli. (2008) Analysis of Air Traffic Radio Land-Air Call Errors. Western China Science and Technology, 155(30):1-3.
[6] Peng L. (2009) an analysis of discourse misunderstanding in land-air calls from correlation theory department. Journal of Civil Aviation Flight Academy of China, 1, 13-15
[7] Xiao Ling. An English Introduction to Global Flight Accident Case Studies. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2010.
[8] Xu Jiujiu. (1995) Twenty years of discourse analysis. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1, 14-20+80.
[9] Xu Jiujiu. (1997) Discourse Analysis in China. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 4, 21-25+81.
[10] Zhu Yongsheng. (2003) Fifty Years of Discourse Analysis: Review and Prospects. Foreign Languages, 3, 43-50.
Downloads: | 20698 |
---|---|
Visits: | 257366 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
-
Information and Knowledge Management
-
Military and Armament Science
-
Media and Communication Research
-
Journal of Human Movement Science
-
Art and Performance Letters
-
Lecture Notes on History
-
Philosophy Journal
-
Science of Law Journal
-
Journal of Political Science Research
-
Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
-
Advances in Broadcasting