Author(s)

Ling Fan ^1,2, Bo Dong ³

Affiliation(s)

¹ Anyang Kindergarten Normal College, Anyang, Henan, 456150, China
² Department of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
³ Normal College of Jingchu Institute of Technology, Jingmen, Hubei, 448000, China

Corresponding Author

Ling Fan

ABSTRACT

Normal reading can cultivate students' reading habits and self-study ability. For the university undergraduates, the course task is relatively heavy, so the reading report activity has become an effective way to exercise the undergraduates' independent learning ability and research ability. However, few studies were found on college students' reading reports in undergraduate classes. This study adopts qualitative research paradigm, the main research object for three undergraduates of a university, using the method of interview, observation and physical collection, found that the undergraduate reading report response process is divided into: serious but passive understanding and preparation — class weak participation and less feedback — after class positive reflection and negative processing doubt three stages. The positive factors affecting the response process include the practicality of the course and the willingness to learn well; the negative factors include less feedback, less communication, and less attraction of reporting content. From the perspective of symbol interaction theory, this study suggests some strategies: creating the situation of equal dialogue, strengthening classroom feedback and guiding the writing of reading report content.

KEYWORDS

Reading and reporting; coping process; influencing factors

CITE THIS PAPER

Ling Fan, Bo Dong, Study of the Coping Process and Influencing Factors of a Case Undergraduate Reading Report Activities. Adult and Higher Education (2023) Vol. 5: 108-114. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aduhe.2023.050620.

REFERENCES

[1] Jin Peihua, Li Yaping, Wang Zhaorong Practice and Enlightenment of graduate study report System [J]. Academic Degree and Postgraduate education. 2001, (9): 24-26.
[2] Wang Yejun. The deepening strategy of preview report before class under the independent learning consciousness [J]. Teaching and management. 2010, (13):44-45.
[3] Wu Zhiyi, Li Fengru, Michael Quinn Patton. Quality tasting and research [M]. Translated. Taipei: Laurel Books Company, 1990:38.
[4] Li Rumi, Liu Lun. Classroom teaching interaction and its optimization strategy—The perspective of symbolic interaction theory [J]. Educational scientific research. 2012, (10):51-55.
[5] Song Linfei. Western sociological theory [M]. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 1997:272.
[6] Li Xing, Wang Mingchun. Definition, misunderstanding and strategy reconstruction of classroom feedback [J]. Teaching and management. 2017, (22):4-6.
[7] Hu Dingrong. A theoretical perspective of learning and a comprehensive classification of classroom feedback [J]. Shanghai Education and scientific research. 2013, (3):57-60.
[8] Glaser B G. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence vs Forcing [M]. Mill Valley: Sociology Press, 1992:286.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology
  
  
• Curriculum and Teaching Methodology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education