Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

The Educational Path of Curriculum Ideology and Politics in Chinese International Education

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/curtm.2023.060210 | Downloads: 7 | Views: 376

Author(s)

Cong Wang 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Digital Economy School, University of Sanya, Sanya, China

Corresponding Author

Cong Wang

ABSTRACT

In international education, ideological and political education(IPE) plays a very important role, and curriculum is the main way for students to learn ideological and political theory, master knowledge and skills, and cultivate moral quality. Through the understanding of traditional Chinese culture, Chinese textbooks and other aspects to analyze its impact on the content of Confucius ideological and moral education at home and abroad. This article will discuss how to play the role of teachers and promote the growth of students from the three aspects of language teaching, social communication and moral education. At the same time, we should also focus on the influence of foreign students in the international community, and strengthen the training of their ideological and political theory curriculum knowledge and practical skills. After that, this paper adopts a questionnaire survey on this path of education. The survey results show that during the teaching process of ideological and political teachers, students' evaluation of the course is mostly based on knowledge and skills, and most of them think that the Chinese international course is very practical.

KEYWORDS

Chinese International Education, Curriculum Ideological, Political education, Education Path

CITE THIS PAPER

Cong Wang, The Educational Path of Curriculum Ideology and Politics in Chinese International Education. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology (2023) Vol. 6: 59-65. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2023.060210.

REFERENCES

[1] Liangfu Jiang: Development and Implementation Path of Kindergarten Stem Educational Activities Based on Data Mining. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022: 2700674:1-2700674:10 (2022).
[2] Gang Luo, Zhiyuan Chen:Adaptive entropy theory polymerization method for path optimization in edge computing educational systems. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 40(2): 2941-2951 (2021).
[3] Omiros Iatrellis, Achilles Kameas, Panos Fitsilis:EDUC8 pathways: executing self-evolving and personalized intra-organizational educational processes. Evol. Syst. 11(2): 227-240 (2020).
[4] Chien-Ching Lee, Soo-Fun Chin: Engineering Students' Perceptions of Graduate Attributes: Perspectives from Two Educational Paths. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 60(1): 42-55 (2017).
[5] Mikko Apiola, Sonsoles López-Pernas, Mohammed Saqr, Arnold Pears, Mats Daniels, Lauri Malmi, Matti Tedre: From a National Meeting to an International Conference: A Scientometric Case Study of a Finnish Computing Education Conference. IEEE Access 10: 66576-66588 (2022).
[6] Martin Robl, Dominik Bork: Enterprise Architecture Management Education in Academia: An International Comparative Analysis. Complex Syst. Informatics Model. Q. 31: 29-50 (2022).
[7] Mustafa Yildiz, Ran Shi, Mehmet Kara: How to improve the design of experimental studies in computing education: Evidence from the international assessments. Educ. Inf. Technol. 27(4): 5075-5102 (2022).
[8] Anat Cohen, Tal Soffer, Michael Henderson: Students' use of technology and their perceptions of its usefulness in higher education: International comparison. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 38(5): 1321-1331 (2022).
[9] José Manuel García-Vandewalle García, Marina García-Carmona, Juan Manuel Trujillo-Torres, Pablo Moya-Fernández: The integration of emerging technologies in socioeconomically disadvantaged educational contexts. The view of international experts. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 38(4): 1185-1197 (2022).
[10] Stanislav Avdeev: International collaboration in higher education research: A gravity model approach. Scientometrics 126(7): 5569-5588 (2021).
[11] Nurassyl Kerimbayev, Nurbol Beisov, natoly Kovtun, Nurdaulet Nurym, Aliya Akramova: Robotics in the international educational space: Integration and the experience. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25(6): 5835-5851 (2020).
[12] Dominik May: Cross Reality Spaces in Engineering Education - Online Laboratories for Supporting International Student Collaboration in Merging Realities. Int. J. Online Biomed. Eng. 16(3): 4-26 (2020).

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.