Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Blended Teaching Model in the Teaching of Art Courses in Colleges and Universities

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/curtm.2022.051211 | Downloads: 9 | Views: 415

Author(s)

Wenbai Liu 1,2

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Fine Arts and Design, Jining Normal University, Wulanchabu, Inner Mongolia, China
2 Philippine Christian University Center for International Education, Manila, Philippine

Corresponding Author

Wenbai Liu

ABSTRACT

In the traditional teaching model(TM), teachers are the main body of the classroom, and students only passively receive knowledge and information. With the progress of education, students are increasingly becoming the main body of learning. What has changed is an update to the educational model. In order to improve the vividness and attractiveness of art courses, this paper conducts related research on the blended TM. This paper mainly uses the questionnaire survey method and the interview method to study whether the art students in colleges and universities (CU) carry out blended teaching and whether the blended teaching plays a role. The survey results show that 86% of students are willing to acquire knowledge in blended teaching, and their learning initiative is high. Therefore, the blended TM is worth using in art courses.

KEYWORDS

Blended Teaching, College Education, Art Courses, Teaching Model

CITE THIS PAPER

Wenbai Liu, Blended Teaching Model in the Teaching of Art Courses in Colleges and Universities. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology (2022) Vol. 5: 97-103. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2022.051211.

REFERENCES

[1] Hadrien Cambazard, Nicolas Catusse, Nadia Brauner, Pierre Lemaire: Teaching OR: Automatic Evaluation for Linear Programming Modelling. 4OR 20(2): 333-345 (2022).
[2] Oscar Pastor, Alfonso Pierantonio, Gustavo Rossi: Teaching Modeling in the Time of Agile Development. Computer 55(6): 73-76 (2022).
[3] Kingsley Okoye, Arturo Arrona-Palacios, Claudia Camacho-Zuñiga, Joaquín Alejandro Guerra Achem, José Escamilla, Samira Hosseini: Towards Teaching Analytics: A Contextual Model for Analysis of Students' Evaluation of Teaching through Text Mining and Machine Learning Classification. Educ. Inf. Technol. 27(3): 3891-3933 (2022).
[4] Yehuda Peled, Sara Perzon: Systemic Model for Technology Integration in Teaching. Educ. Inf. Technol. 27(2): 2661-2675 (2022).
[5] Cathy H. Xia, Nan-shan Chen, Priya Natarajan: Teaching Performance Modeling via Software and Instructional Technology. SIGMETRICS Perform. Evaluation Rev. 49(4): 14-19 (2022).
[6] Donya Rooein, Devis Bianchini, Francesco Leotta, Massimo Mecella, Paolo Paolini, Barbara Pernici: aCHAT-WF: Generating Conversational Agents for Teaching Business Process Models. Softw. Syst. Model. 21(3): 891-914 (2022).
[7] Chetna Gupta, Varun Gupta, Agnieszka Stachowiak: Adoption of ICT-Based Teaching in Engineering: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model Perspective. IEEE Access 9: 58652-58666 (2021).
[8] Cornelis J. de Brabander, Folke J. Glastra: The Unified Model of Task-Specific Motivation and Teachers' Motivation to Learn about Teaching and Learning Supportive Modes of ICT Use. Educ. Inf. Technol. 26(1): 393-420 (2021).
[9] Thong Nguyen-Huy, Ravinesh C. Deo, Shahjahan Khan, Aruna Devi, Adewuyi Ayodele Adeyinka, Armando A. Apan, Zaher Mundher Yaseen: Student Performance Predictions for Advanced Engineering Mathematics Course With New Multivariate Copula Models. IEEE Access 10: 45112-45136 (2022).
[10] Luis Abraham Sánchez-Gaspariano, Israel Vivaldo-de-la-Cruz, Jesús M. Muñoz-Pacheco, Luz del Carmen Gómez-Pavón, Arnulfo Luis-Ramos: EI-SCAM as a Teaching Tool in an Undergraduate Course in Analog and High-Frequency Circuits. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 30(4): 1022-1035 (2022).
[11] Idris Aktas, Haluk Özmen: Assessing the Performance of Turkish Science Pre-Service Teachers in a TPACK-Practical Course. Educ. Inf. Technol. 27(3): 3495-3528 (2022).
[12] André Menolli, João Coelho Neto: Computational Thinking in Computer Science Teacher Training Courses in Brazil: A Survey and a Research Roadmap. Educ. Inf. Technol. 27(2): 2099-2135 (2022).

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.