Analysis on the Collaborative Innovation Organization Model of Agricultural Scientific Research Featuring Collaborative Tasks-Take the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences as an Example
DOI: 10.23977/jhms.2019.11001 | Downloads: 5 | Views: 1504
Wang Peng 1
1 School of Economics and Management, Dalian University, No.10, Xuefu Avenue, Economic & Technical Development Zone, Dalian, Liaoning,The People's Republic of China(PRC)
Corresponding AuthorWang Peng
Modern agriculture has a growing demand for scientific and technological innovation. It faces the main battlefield of modern agricultural construction, the resolution of major problems in the development of agricultural industry and the breakthrough of core technologies. The construction and development of agriculture and rural areas puts higher demands on technological innovation. As an important organizational form of agricultural scientific research innovation, collaborative innovation plays an important role in the construction of innovative countries in China, and is also of great significance for the construction of modern agricultural research institutes. Taking the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences as an example, this paper summarizes the status quo, implementation effects and main problems of the collaborative research tasks of agricultural scientific research, explores the root causes of the problems, and proposes to strengthen the collaborative innovation planning layout and strengthen the collaborative task classification. Guide and other important measures to promote the efficient coordination of agricultural research, with a view to providing reference for the strengthening and cooperation of modern agricultural research institutes.
KEYWORDSCollaborative innovation, Agricultural research, Modern institutes, Collaborative projects
CITE THIS PAPER
Wang Peng, Analysis on the Collaborative Innovation Organization Model of Agricultural Scientific Research Featuring Collaborative Tasks-Take the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences as an Example. Journal of Human Movement Science (2019) 1: 1-4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jhms.2019.11001.
 Franco Cescon. (2019) Strategic choices and strategic management accounting in large manufacturing firms, Journal of Management and Governance, 2, 20–39
 Marc Castellnou. (2019) Empowering strategic decision-making for wildfire management: avoiding the fear trap and creating a resilient landscape, Fire Ecology, 2, 162–180.
 Evgenii Shumilov. (2004) Critical evaluation of current molecular MRD strategies including NGS for the management of AML patients with multiple mutations. Hematological Oncology, 3, 106–127.