Author(s)

Lanfang Sun ¹, Yuting Wang ², Huiru Meng ³

Affiliation(s)

¹ Beijing Normal University, College of Chinese Language and Culture, Beijing100875, China
² Beijing Normal University, School of Chinese Language and Literature, Beijing100875, China
³ Beijing Normal University, School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Beijing100875, China

Corresponding Author

Lanfang Sun

ABSTRACT

In the traditional English teaching process, instructors tend to conduct teacher-centered classroom activities. This is convenient for teachers to play a leading role in the teaching process, and effectively organize and control the entire classroom instructional process. The initiative of students is neglected and the creativity and imagination of students is limited, which cannot focus on student individual differences in accordance with their aptitude. As a result, the use of the computer-assisted learning should be paid more attention. Compared with traditional classroom learning, online learning not only has no time and space constraints, but more importantly, students can choose their own learning content and learning according to their own conditions during the online learning process, in order to give full play to the initiative of students in learning. This study combines the practical teaching of the English grammar course of educational psychology, focuses on the correlation between English classroom teaching and learning level, major, and gender. Data will be collected, organized and analysed by mathematical statistics. The optimization process is designed by mixing multiple features and multiple methods. The results indicate that only 26% of freshmen believe that educational psychology has played a significant role in English teaching, while 72% of seniors believe that educational psychology is very important for learning English. It can be seen that teaching English to students from the perspective of educational psychology is very important for students. Meanwhile, it can be said that the blended learning mode is a new and optimized learning method under the background of e-learning, which can effectively improve the current English classroom teaching effect at tertiary level.

KEYWORDS

Educational Psychology, College English Classroom, Teaching Process Optimization, English Learning Strategies, Multi-Feature Blended Learning

CITE THIS PAPER

Lanfang Sun, Yuting Wang and Huiru Meng. Optimization of College English Classroom Teaching Process from the Perspective of Educational Psychology Based on Multi-feature Blended Learning. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology (2021) 5: 180-195. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2021.57025

REFERENCES

[1] Zolotariov E, Foca E. Strategies for Modelling the Educational Process from the Perspective of Internal Resources Stimulation of the Child[J]. Nephron Clinical Practice, 2017, 14(1):277-283.
[2] Qian-Yun, Guo, Wen-Xia, et al. [A study on the development of English teaching model of stomatology].[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2019, 28(6):670-672.
[3] Zhang L, Zhang D. Visual Understanding via Multi-Feature Shared Learning With Global Consistency[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2016, 18(2):247-259.
[4] Chelghoum A . Promoting Students' Self-Regulated Learning Through Digital Platforms: New Horizon in Educational Psychology[J]. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 2017, 6(5):123-131.
[5] Qian-Yun, Guo, Wen-Xia, et al. [A study on the development of English teaching model of stomatology].[J]. Shanghai journal of stomatology, 2019, 28(6):670-672.
[6] Bradford C T , Kroeker S D L . Educational Psychology in Yukon[J]. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2016, 31(3):271-274.
[7] Rhemtulla M, Hancock G R . Planned Missing Data Designs in Educational Psychology Research[J]. Educational Psychologist, 2016, 51(3-4):305-316.
[8] Kablan, Zeynel. The effect of manipulatives on mathematics achievement across different learning styles[J]. Educational Psychology, 2016, 36(2):1-20.
[9] Harring J R, Hodis F A . Mixture Modeling: Applications in Educational Psychology[J]. Educational Psychologist, 2016, 51(3-4):354-367.
[10] Schulze J, Winter L A , Woods K , et al. Investigating the significance of social justice in educational psychology practice - A systematic literature review[J]. Educational and Child Psychology, 2017, 34(3):57-73.
[11] Chelghoum A. Promoting Students' Self-Regulated Learning Through Digital Platforms: New Horizon in Educational Psychology[J]. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 2017, 6(5):123-131.
[12] Quintana S M, Mahgoub L. Ethnic and Racial Disparities in Education: Psychology's Role in Understanding and Reducing Disparities[J]. Theory Into Practice, 2016, 55(2):94-103.
[13] Uyank G. Effect of Learning Cycle Approach-based Science Teaching on Academic Achievement, Attitude, Motivation and Retention[J]. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2016, 4(5):1223-1230.
[14] Dong F. 54.An Optimization Mode of College English Multiple Interactive Teaching under the Computer Network and Digital Technology[J]. Boletin Tecnico/technical Bulletin, 2017, 55(10):371-378.
[15] Nichols K, Burgh G, Kennedy C. Comparing Two Inquiry Professional Development Interventions in Science on Primary Students' Questioning and Other Inquiry Behaviours[J]. Research in ence Education, 2017, 47(1):1-24.
[16] Han J, Yin H, Wang W. The effect of tertiary teachers' goal orientations for teaching on their commitment: The mediating role of teacher engagement[J]. Educational Psychology, 2016, 36(3):526-547.
[17] Li X. Optimization method for English teaching mode innovation and development countermeasures based on multimedia information platform[J]. Boletin Tecnico/Technical Bulletin, 2017, 55(16):550-558.
[18] Entwistle N. Contributions of educational psychology to understanding student learning: What has been discovered - what more could be done?[J]. Educational Psychology Review, 2019, 43(1):9-19.
[19] Wininger S R, Redifer J L, Norman A D, et al. Prevalence of Learning Styles in Educational Psychology and Introduction to Education Textbooks: A Content Analysis[J]. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 2019, 18(3):221-243.
[20] Begeny J C, Wang J, Hida R M, et al. A global examination of peer-reviewed, scholarly journal outlets devoted to school and educational psychology[J]. School Psychology International, 2019, 40(6):547-580.
[21] Chu T L A. Applying educational psychology in coaching athletes by Jeffrey J. Huber, Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics, 2013, 440 pp. $43.43 (hardback), ISBN: 978-0-736-07981-5[J]. Sports Coaching Review, 2020, 9(1):119-121.
[22] Yu Y, Tang Y. The construction of hierarchical network model and wireless activation diffusion optimization model in English teaching[J]. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2020, 2020(1):1-14.
[23] Wininger S R, Redifer J L, Norman A D, et al. Prevalence of Learning Styles in Educational Psychology and Introduction to Education Textbooks: A Content Analysis[J]. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 2019, 18(3):221-243.
[24] Begeny J C, Wang J, Hida R M, et al. A global examination of peer-reviewed, scholarly journal outlets devoted to school and educational psychology[J]. School Psychology International, 2019, 40(6):547-580.
[25] Chu T L A. Applying educational psychology in coaching athletesby Jeffrey J. Huber, Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics, 2013, 440 pp. $43.43 (hardback), ISBN: 978-0-736-07981-5[J]. Sports Coaching Review, 2020, 9(1):119-121.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Curriculum and Teaching Methodology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education
  
  
• Adult and Higher Education