Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

The Tool Preference and Optimization Path of Teacher Education Policy: Content Analysis Based on 25 Policy Texts

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/aetp.2021.57005 | Downloads: 15 | Views: 893

Author(s)

Li Gao 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Educational Science, Shanxi Normal University, Taiyuan 030000, China

Corresponding Author

Li Gao

ABSTRACT

The achievement of teacher education policy goals is inseparable from the scientific selection and rational use of policy tools. This research is based on the perspective of policy tools, with the help of content analysis, according to sample selection, constructing a two-dimensional analysis framework, text analysis unit and data analysis logic for teacher education policy, and analyzes the policy tool preferences and laws in 25 teacher education policy texts. This study found that there are obvious differences and unbalanced characteristics in teacher education policy tools used in teacher education; command tools and capacity building tools are "simple" and diverse, and lower-level tools are insufficient; policy tools are biased towards long-term construction and ignore short-term planning; The lack of systemic transformative tools, and the lack of a scientific combination of policy tools. Propose balanced teacher education policy tools; optimize the combination of policy tools; increase incentive tools and system transformational tools; actively introduce voluntary tools to achieve the corresponding optimization path of teacher education governance with the participation of multiple subjects.

KEYWORDS

Teacher education policy, Policy tool, Content analysis method

CITE THIS PAPER

Li Gao. The Tool Preference and Optimization Path of Teacher Education Policy: Content Analysis Based on 25 Policy Texts. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology (2021) 5: 29-44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2021.57005.

REFERENCES

[1] Yang Yue. On my country's Teacher Education Policy Research [J]. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2018(01): 60-66.
[2] Qi Zhanyong, Chen Zhaoyang. Visual analysis of common words in the research hotspots of teacher education policy in my country [J]. Contemporary Teacher Education, 2017, 10(01): 53-61.
[3] Zhao Lili. Analysis of the text content of China's photovoltaic industry policy from the perspective of policy tools [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2011.
[4] E.S. Savas. Privatization and the partnership between the public and private sectors [M]. Zhou Zhiren, translated. Beijing: Renmin University of China Press, 2002: 25-27.
[5] MCDONNELL L M, ELMORE R F. Getting the job done: alternative policy instruments [J].Educational evaluation and policy analysis.1987, 9(2) 133-152.
[6] SCHNEIDER A, INGRAM H. Behavioral assumptions of policy tools [J]. The journal of politics, 1990, 52(2) 510-529.
[7] Michael Howlett, M. Ramish. Public Policy Research: Policy Cycle and Policy Subsystem [M]. Pang Shi, et al. Shanghai: Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore, 2006: 17.
[8] Ji Fei, Wu Shuiye. The selection of policy tools for the development of vocational education in the western region under the background of poverty alleviation — Based on the quantitative analysis of the text of 21 documents in Guizhou Province [J]. Guizhou Social Sciences, 2019 (1): 92-100.
[9] Qiu Junping, Zou Fei. Research on content analysis method [J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2004, (2): 12-17.
[10] Chen Kun. Content analysis method and its application in comparative education [J]. Culture and Education Data, 2009(22):161-162.
[11] Cao Yan. Fundamental Education Equity from the Perspective of Policy Tools: Retrospect and Prospect: A Textual Analysis Based on the Basic Education Equity Policy from 1979 to 2016 [J]. Educational Science, 2017, 33(04): 24-31.
[12] Cui Hongjie. Research on my country's Teacher Education Policy since the Reform and Opening Up [D]. Northeast Normal University, 2014: 3-5.
[13] ELMORE R F.Instruments and Strategy in Public Policy [J].Policy Studies Review, 1987, 7(1): 174-186.
[14] Ding Huang, Yang Daifu. The perspective, research approach and model construction of policy tool selection [J]. Administrative Forum, 2009, 16(03): 21-26.
[15] Qin Yaojian. Choice of Policy Tools for Urban Ecological Environment Governance [J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Vocational College of Ecological Engineering, 2015, 28(01): 3-4.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.