Author(s)

Zhang Nan ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ International School of Nursing, Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou, 571137, China

Corresponding Author

Zhang Nan

ABSTRACT

Clinical reasoning is a core competence in nursing education. It helps nursing students collect patient cues, interpret clinical information, make safe decisions, and reflect on nursing actions. In recent years, technology-enhanced learning has been widely used in nursing education, including simulation, virtual simulation, virtual patients, online learning, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence-supported learning. These methods may provide safe, repeatable, and interactive learning contexts for students to practise clinical reasoning before entering real clinical settings. This systematic review aims to summarize current evidence on clinical reasoning in technology-enhanced nursing education. The review focuses on three questions: what technologies have been used, how these technologies support clinical reasoning, and what problems still exist in current research. The reviewed literature shows that simulation-based learning and virtual simulation are the most common approaches. These methods can improve students' clinical reasoning, knowledge retention, self-efficacy, confidence, and satisfaction. Structured debriefing and reflection are important mechanisms that link technology use with reasoning development. However, current studies still have limitations, such as small samples, short intervention periods, inconsistent outcome measures, and limited long-term follow-up. Future research should use stronger designs, clearer theoretical models, and more direct measures of clinical reasoning.

KEYWORDS

Clinical reasoning; Nursing education; Technology-enhanced learning; Simulation; Virtual simulation; Clinical judgment

CITE THIS PAPER

Zhang Nan. Systematic Review of Clinical Reasoning in Technology-Enhanced Nursing Education. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology (2026). Vol. 9, No. 4, 52-57. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2026.090408.

REFERENCES

[1] Tanner, C. A. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(6), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20060601-04
[2] Levett-Jones, T., Hoffman, K., Dempsey, J., Jeong, S. Y. S., Noble, D., Norton, C. A., Roche, J., & Hickey, N. (2010). The "five rights" of clinical reasoning: An educational model to enhance nursing students' ability to identify and manage clinically "at risk" patients. Nurse Education Today, 30(6), 515–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.10.020
[3] Sim, J. J. M., Rusli, K. D. B., Seah, B., Levett-Jones, T., & Liaw, S. Y. (2022). Virtual simulation to enhance clinical reasoning in nursing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 69, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2022.05.006
[4] Padilha, J. M., Machado, P. P., Ribeiro, A., Ramos, J., & Costa, P. (2019). Clinical virtual simulation in nursing education: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(3), e11529. https://doi.org/10.2196/11529
[5] Lasater, K. (2007). Clinical judgment development: Using simulation to create an assessment rubric. Journal of Nursing Education, 46(11), 496–503. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20071101-04
[6] Hayden, J. K., Smiley, R. A., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P. R. (2014). The NCSBN National Simulation Study: A longitudinal, randomized, controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(2), S3–S40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(15)30062-4
[7] Dreifuerst, K. T. (2012). Using debriefing for meaningful learning to foster development of clinical reasoning in simulation. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(6), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20120409-02

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education
  
  
• Adult and Higher Education