Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Affordances of Intimacy: A Comparative Study of Platform Design and Relationship Practices among Chinese Young Adults on Soul and Momo

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/mediacr.2026.070205 | Downloads: 0 | Views: 35

Author(s)

Xintong Li 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Advertising and Branding, Communication University of China, Beijing, China

Corresponding Author

Xintong Li

ABSTRACT

Drawing on platform affordance theory, this study compares Soul and Momo to examine how stranger-socializing platforms shape young adults’ intimate relationships through interface design, matching algorithms, and interaction rules. Based on semi-structured interviews with 25 young adults who had used both platforms and three-stage coding, it analyzes the links among technological design, interaction scripts, and relationship forms. The findings show that Momo, through geographical proximity, visual display, and instant connection, constructs an efficiency-oriented filtering script that makes intimacy momentary, shallow, and highly substitutable. By contrast, Soul, through de-visualization, interest-based matching, and narrative expression, constructs a meaning-oriented performative script in which relationships depend more on narrative prelude, sustained investment, and spiritual expectation. Young users move between platforms according to emotional needs, adjusting interaction rhythm, self-presentation, and relationship expectations to produce differentiated forms of the "platformed self." Yet these choices remain shaped by technological rules and commercial logic. Overall, platform affordances, interaction scripts, and relationship forms form a chain of effects that produces a paradox of platformized intimacy: expanded choice coexisting with emotional fatigue and constrained subjectivity. This study highlights the co-construction of technology and emotion and suggests that platform design should give greater attention to user autonomy, emotional well-being, and a healthy relational ecology.

KEYWORDS

Platform affordance; Intimate relationships; Stranger-socialing platforms; Emotional capitalism

CITE THIS PAPER

Xintong Li. Affordances of Intimacy: A Comparative Study of Platform Design and Relationship Practices among Chinese Young Adults on Soul and Momo. Media and Communication Research (2026). Vol. 7, No. 2, 35-47. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/mediacr.2026.070205.

REFERENCES

[1] Hutchby, I. Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology 2001, 35(2), 441–456.
[2] Nagy, P.; Neff, G. Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media + Society 2015, 1(2), 1–9.
[3] Van Dijck, J. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013.
[4] Treem, J.W.; Leonardi, P.M. Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association 2013, 36(1), 143–189.
[5] de Souza e Silva, A.; Frith, J. Locative mobile social networks: Mapping communication and location in urban spaces. Mobilities 2010, 5(4), 485–506.
[6] Bucher, T. If... Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2018.
[7] Baym, N.K. Personal Connections in the Digital Age, 2nd ed.; Polity Press: Cambridge, UK, 2015.
[8] Illouz, E. Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism; Polity Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007.
[9] Cao, X.; Sun, P. Platformed ritual in emotions: (Dys)functional construction of intimacy in digital dating in China. Social Media + Society 2025, 11(1). 
[10] Zhang, X. Manufacturing "intimacy famine": The alienation and breakthrough of intimate relationships in the digital age. Journalism & Communication 2025, (5), 16–24, 34.
[11] Zhang, Z. Intimate relationships in digital social environments: The interactive effects of media technology, user behavior, and content production. Journal of Yangtze Normal University 2025, 41(4), 63–72.
[12] Szulc, Ł. Sad dating apps: Emotional technological determinism and agency in late modernity. Social Media + Society 2025, 11(4). 
[13] Hobbs, M.; Owen, S.; Gerber, L. Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships, and the digital transformation of intimacy. Journal of Sociology 2017, 53(2), 271–284.
[14] Ding, D.; Zhuang, R.; Fu, J. Fluid "partners": Platform migration in mediatized intimate relationships. Journal of North University of China (Social Science Edition) 2025. 
[15] Niu, X. Interaction and imagination: Media practices of users on stranger dating platforms from the perspective of imagined affordance—A case study of Qingteng Zhilian App. News World 2025, (10), 39–42 (in Chinese).

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.