Author(s)

Sha Li ¹, Yuhe Sun ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, 541006, China

Corresponding Author

Yuhe Sun

ABSTRACT

The entry of generative artificial intelligence into college English classrooms has changed the way students obtain resources, revise their language output, and participate in classroom interaction. While existing studies have mainly emphasized tool functions and teaching efficiency, less attention has been paid to how learning motivation is supported and weakened in this new instructional structure. Drawing on Self-Determination Theory, this paper examines learning motivation in generative AI-supported college English classrooms from the perspective of three-way interaction among the teacher, the student, and the intelligent system. It argues that AI can support motivation when system suggestions create opportunities for autonomous judgment, feedback and revision help students confirm their competence, and human-machine practice returns to authentic classroom communication. At the same time, algorithmic dependence, instant answers, and technological mediation may weaken autonomy, reduce the experience of competence, and undermine relatedness. The paper further proposes practical adjustments from both teacher support and student autonomy, emphasizing that system output should become learning material only after pedagogical judgment, critical processing, and interpersonal verification. This analysis clarifies the motivational conditions and risk boundaries of AI-supported college English teaching.

KEYWORDS

Generative artificial intelligence; Learning motivation; Self-determination theory

CITE THIS PAPER

Sha Li, Yuhe Sun. Learning Motivation in Generative AI-Supported Comprehensive English Teaching: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Teacher-Student-AI Interaction. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology (2026). Vol. 10, No. 3, 62-72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2026.100308.

REFERENCES

[1] Chen M, Lyu M. College English writing instruction in the ChatGPT environment [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024(1): 161-168.
[2] Cui X. Artificial intelligence, opportunities and challenges for language teaching [J]. Chinese Language Teaching and Research, 2024(2): 20-29.
[3] Shan J, Liu Y. Research on generative artificial intelligence empowering learning design [J]. e-Education Research, 2024, 45(7): 73-80.
[4] Guan J, Li W, He G, Zhang X. Artificial intelligence feedback: A literature review and research prospects [J]. Foreign Economics and Management, 2025, 47(3): 83-100.
[5] Huang B, Song Z, Qian X. Risk manifestations, early warnings, and mitigation of integrating generative artificial intelligence into the higher education ecosystem [J]. Modern Educational Technology, 2024, 34(5): 16-26.
[6] Ke Q, Mi Q, Bao T. Application of generative artificial intelligence in basic education: Opportunities, risks, and countermeasures [J]. Modern Educational Technology, 2024, 34(9): 5-13.
[7] Kong L. The application of generative artificial intelligence in foreign language major teaching: A case study of teaching the College Critical Thinking English Course intensive reading textbook [J]. Foreign Language Education Research Frontiers, 2024, 7(1): 11-18, 90.
[8] Li Z. ChatGPT empowering foreign language teaching: Scenarios and strategies [J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 2024, 46(1): 109-118.
[9] Liu J, Qiu L. Risk generation and regulation of generative artificial intelligence embedded in educational applications [J]. Modern Distance Education, 2024(4): 12-19.
[10] Qin L, Dong J, Zhang A. A study on the emotional experience of English learners' narrative writing revision under generative artificial intelligence mediation: A Q-methodology study of continuation writing instruction [J]. Foreign Languages in China, 2025, 22(2): 61-70.
[11] Wang Y, Zhu T, Yang S, Zheng Y. Human-machine collaborative teaching: Motivation, essence, and challenges [J]. e-Education Research, 2024, 45(8): 51-57.
[12] Wang J, Chen T, Yang Y. Co-creation through the fusion of thinking and regulation: Research on the human-intelligence interaction process and patterns supported by generative artificial intelligence [J]. China Educational Technology, 2024(8): 45-55.
[13] Wu C, Rong S, Zhu F, Chen Y, Guo Y. Basic psychological needs and their satisfaction [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 1063-1073.
[14] Wu J, Zhou W, Cao C. Empirical research on generative artificial intelligence technology empowering oral language teaching [J]. China Educational Technology, 2024(4): 105-111.
[15] Xu J, Zhao C. The role of large language models in English teaching [J]. Foreign Language Education Research Frontiers, 2024, 7(1): 3-10, 90.
[16] Zhang C, Meng Y. A study on engagement differences between teacher feedback and generative AI feedback among English learners in writing [J]. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 2025(6): 52-64, 146.
[17] Zhu Y, Zhan Z, Yan S. A new form of self-directed learning based on generative artificial intelligence [J]. Modern Educational Technology, 2026, 36(1): 35-44.
[18] Garrison D R, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education [J]. The Internet and Higher Education, 2000, 2(2-3): 87-105.
[19] Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback [J]. Review of Educational Research, 2007, 77(1): 81-112.
[20] Ryan R M, Deci E L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions [J]. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2000, 25(1): 54-67.
[21] Ryan R M, Deci E L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being [J]. American Psychologist, 2000, 55(1): 68-78.
[22] Shute V J. Focus on formative feedback [J]. Review of Educational Research, 2008, 78(1): 153-189.
[23] ten Cate O T J, Kusurkar R A, Williams G. How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 59 [J]. Medical Teacher, 2011, 33(12): 961-973.
[24] Tu C H, McIsaac M S. The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes [J]. The American Journal of Distance Education, 2002, 16(3): 131-150.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Curriculum and Teaching Methodology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education
  
  
• Adult and Higher Education