Author(s)

Lin Shi ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou, Hainan, 571100, China

Corresponding Author

Lin Shi

ABSTRACT

This study explores the complex interplay between reflective thinking, achievement motivation, and English proficiency among university EFL learners. Drawing upon metacognitive learning theory and achievement goal theory, the research investigates two key hypotheses: (1) that reflective thinking positively predicts English proficiency, and (2) that achievement motivation moderates this relationship. A sample of 200 Chinese university students completed standardized instruments including the Reflective Thinking Questionnaire and the Achievement Motivation Scale, with English proficiency assessed through CET-4 scores. The full questionnaire items were incorporated and validated. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analysis revealed moderate positive associations among the three variables. Hierarchical regression analysis confirmed the predictive role of reflective thinking and identified a significant interaction effect: high achievement motivation amplified the positive impact of reflective thinking on English proficiency. These findings offer critical insights for EFL pedagogy, highlighting the dual importance of cognitive self-regulation and motivational engagement in language learning outcomes. Implications include the need for integrative learning interventions that develop both reflective habits and motivational orientation in language learners.

KEYWORDS

Reflective Thinking; Achievement Motivation; English Proficiency; EFL Learners; Moderation Analysis

CITE THIS PAPER

Lin Shi, Reflective Thinking and English Proficiency: The Moderating Effect of Achievement Motivation. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology (2025) Vol. 9: 33-39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2025.090406.

REFERENCES

[1] Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Australian Council for Educational Research.
[2] Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath.
[3] K., & Yeung, E. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 381–395.
[4] Moon, J. (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning. RoutledgeFalmer.
[5] Goh, C. C. M. (2013). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. Cambridge University Press.
[6] Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475.
[7] Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House.
[8] McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton: Van Nostrand.
[9] Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
[10] Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
[11] Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232.
[12] Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., Jones, A., Loke, A. Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371.
[13] Elliot, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5–12.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Curriculum and Teaching Methodology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education
  
  
• Adult and Higher Education