Author(s)

Wei Cheng ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ Krirk University, Bangkok, Thailand

Corresponding Author

Wei Cheng

ABSTRACT

This study explores the different models and effectiveness of home-school collaboration in educational management through empirical analysis. The research indicates that three models—administrative leadership, professional cooperation, and community building—work through institutional, technological, and relational pathways, respectively, but all face structural issues. For example, while the administrative model increases service coverage, it weakens emotional connections between families and schools; the professional model enhances parental caregiving skills but reduces interaction warmth; the community model boosts parental participation but creates new barriers to engagement. The study also finds that rigid institutions, resource misallocation, and cultural inertia are key factors limiting effectiveness, especially in the digital transformation of education, where ordinary families face the challenge of data marginalization. Based on dynamic governance theory, a "flexible adaptation" framework is proposed, suggesting the use of blockchain technology, dual-track negotiation mechanisms, and composite evaluation systems to address inefficiencies in home-school collaboration and to build an inclusive co-governance ecosystem.

KEYWORDS

Home-school cooperation; Education governance mode; Collaborative governance; Technology empowerment; Dynamic adaptation

CITE THIS PAPER

Wei Cheng, Study on the mode and effect of home-school cooperation in educational management. Adult and Higher Education (2025) Vol. 7: 56-61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aduhe.2025.070210.

REFERENCES

[1] Liu Mangge and Liu Liming. An Inquiry into the Promotion of Urban Family Education Collaborative Governance under the Background of "Double Reduction" [J]. Journal of Hunan University of Humanities and Science, 2024, 41(04):112-117.
[2] Zhuang Xizhen. Reform of Local Government Education Governance Model from the Perspective of "Ideology" [J]. Educational Theory and Practice, 2009,29(16):23-26.
[3] Geng Jian. Model Choice of Public Governance in Chinese Higher Education—and Discussion on the Direction and Approach of University Management System Reform [J]. Jiangsu Higher Education, 2005, (03): 30-32+36. DOI:10.13236/j.cnki.jshe.2005.03.011.
[4] Yue Ying. The Current Situation and Influencing Factors of School Cooperation in China [J]. Journal of Tianjin Institute of Educational Sciences, 2002,(03):50-53.DOI:10.16137/j.cnki.cn12-1303/g4.2002.03.014.
[5] Peng Xi and Guo Kai. Obstacles to Home-school Cooperation and Their Responses [J]. Educational Science, 2001, (04):28-30. 

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology
  
  
• Curriculum and Teaching Methodology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education