Author(s)

Yanming Zeng ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou, Hainan, 571100, China

Corresponding Author

Yanming Zeng

ABSTRACT

This comprehensive study investigates the profound influence of culturally embedded cognitive schemas on the reception and interpretation of foreign literary works within the Chinese cultural context. Combining qualitative and interdisciplinary methodologies—including textual analysis, semi-structured interviews, comparative case studies, and theoretical frameworks from cognitive psychology and cross-cultural communication—the research systematically examines how Chinese philosophical traditions (Confucianism, Daoism, Buddhism) and Western individualism shape distinct interpretive paradigms. Through an in-depth exploration of 20 foreign literary works, interviews with 50 participants (students, translators, and educators), and a comparative analysis of Chinese and Western critical reviews, the study identifies recurring patterns of misinterpretation, adaptation, and re-contextualization. Key findings reveal that Chinese cognitive schemas prioritize relational harmony, collective morality, and contextual narratives, leading to interpretations that often diverge from authorial intent. The research underscores the necessity of culturally sensitive translation practices, pedagogical strategies that bridge cognitive gaps, and policy initiatives to foster global literary dialogue. By integrating empirical data with theoretical insights, this paper contributes to the fields of translation studies, comparative literature, and intercultural communication, offering actionable recommendations for scholars, educators, and policymakers.

KEYWORDS

Cognitive schemas, cross-cultural interpretation, literary reception, cultural bias, translation studies, Confucianism, individualism

CITE THIS PAPER

Yanming Zeng, The Impact of Cognitive Schemas on the Reception and Interpretation of Foreign Literary Works: A Cross-Cultural Exploration. Lecture Notes on Language and Literature (2025) Vol. 8: 140-146. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/langl.2025.080120.

REFERENCES

[1] Tu W. Confucian Thought: Selfhood as Creative Transformation. SUNY Press. 1998.
[2] Nisbett R. The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently ... and why. Free Press. 2003.
[3] Li J. East vs. West: Cognitive Divergences in Literary Interpretation. Asian Studies Review, 2018, 39(4):567-582.
[4] Wang L. Digital Platforms and Literary Misinterpretation. Media Culture Journal, 2021, 14(2):45-67.
[5] Zhang H. Confucian Frameworks and Foreign Literature. Chinese Literary Quarterly, 2016, 28(4):89-104.
[6] Liu Xiaodong. Cultural preferences in narrative reception: Familial bonds and Confucian values in foreign literature. 2019.
[7] Chen Y. Cultural untranslatability in literary works. Journal of Cross-Cultural Communication, 2020, 45(3): 112-125.
[8] Wang L. Digital Platforms and Literary Misinterpretation. Media Culture Journal, 2021, 14(2):45-67.
[9] Said E. Orientalism pantheon books[J]. New York, 1978.
[10] Roberts T. Exoticism and misreading in Western reception of Chinese literature. Comparative Literature, 2016, 68(2):203-219.
[11] Nisbett R E, Miyamoto Y. The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception[J]. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2005, 9(10): 467-473.
[12] Wilson A. & Thompson L. Cultural Narratives and Interpretive Schemas: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Literary Reception. East-West differences in literary interpretation. 2016.
[13] Hofstede G. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values[M]. Sage, 1984.
[14] Bartlett F C. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology[M]. Cambridge university press, 1995.
[15] Cain W E. Jauss,"tr." Bahti," Toward an Aesthetic of Reception"(Book Review)[J]. Western Humanities Review, 1983, 37(3): 261.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
  
  
• Information and Knowledge Management
  
  
• Military and Armament Science
  
  
• Media and Communication Research
  
  
• Journal of Human Movement Science
  
  
• Art and Performance Letters
  
  
• Lecture Notes on History
  
  
• Philosophy Journal
  
  
• Science of Law Journal
  
  
• Journal of Political Science Research
  
  
• Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
  
  
• Advances in Broadcasting