Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

An Empirical Study on the Impact of Chatgpt on Writing Proficiency in Chinese EFL Learners

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/curtm.2024.070425 | Downloads: 8 | Views: 55

Author(s)

Yang Yang 1

Affiliation(s)

1 International School, Guangzhou College of Commerce, Guangzhou, China

Corresponding Author

Yang Yang

ABSTRACT

This empirical study explores the impact of ChatGPT on writing proficiency among Chinese EFL learners. Using a qualitative case study approach, three Chinese undergraduate students participated in semi-structured interviews to provide in-depth insights into their experiences with ChatGPT. It addresses two research questions: First, the features of ChatGPT that contribute to improving writing proficiency include helping students think deeply, grammar and spelling check, vocabulary and expression, logical structure and paragraph organization. Second, the impact of ChatGPT on students' writing is significant, leading to better composition structure, more details and improved composition logic, as well as diverse word choice. The findings suggest that integrating ChatGPT into writing instruction can effectively enhance students' writing outcome. 

KEYWORDS

ChatGPT, English Writing Proficiency, Chinese EFL learners

CITE THIS PAPER

Yang Yang, An Empirical Study on the Impact of Chatgpt on Writing Proficiency in Chinese EFL Learners. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology (2024) Vol. 7: 172-178. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2024.070425.

REFERENCES

[1] Abdelghani, R., Wang, Y. H., Yuan, X., Wang, T., Sauzéon, H., & Oudeyer, P. Y. (2022). GPT-3-driven pedagogical agents for training children's curious question-asking skills. ArXiv. 
[2] Abramson, A. (2023, April 7). How to use ChatGPT as a learning tool. Monitor on Psychology, 54(4). 
[3] Cai, H. P., & Fang, Y. (2006). A research and analysis of the current issues in undergraduate English writing education. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 210(9), 21-24.
[4] Cai, J. G. (2002). Influence of CET writing requirements and scoring criteria on Chinese students’ compositions. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 25(5), 49-53.
[5] Cascella, M., Montomoli, J., Bellini, V., & Bignami, E. (2023). Evaluating the feasibility of ChatGPT in healthcare: An analysis of multiple clinical and research scenarios. Journal of Medical Systems, 47(1), 1-5. 
[6] Çelik, S. (2020). Building Critical Academic Writing Skills: The Impact of Instructor Feedback on Turkish ELT Graduate Students. Tesl-Ej, 24(3), n3.
[7] Chen, Q. B. (2016). Reconstruction of the teaching model of college English writing in the Big Data era. Foreign Language Research, 190(3), 129-132.
[8] Chiu, T. K., Huang, R., & Mak, B. (2023). The impact of AI-powered chatbots on student learning and well-being in EFL contexts. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 1-24.
[9] Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
[10] Dijkstra, R., Genç, Z., Kayal, S., & Kamps, J. (2022, July 27-31). Reading comprehension quiz generation using generative pre-trained transformers [Paper presentation]. The 23th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED’ 2022).
[11] Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–15. 
[12] Fryer, L. K., & Carpenter, R. (2006). Bots as language learning tools: Effects on achievement, attitudes, and learner autonomy. ReCALL, 18(3), 255-271. 
[13] Gilson, A., Safranek, C. W., Huang, T., Socrates, V., Chi, L., Taylor, R. A., & Chartash, D. (2023). How does CHATGPT perform on the United States medical licensing examination? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), e45312. https://doi.org/10.2196/45312
[14] Guo, H. F. (2006). English writing education in undergraduate studies and the development of composition ability. Education Exploration, 180(6), 66-67.
[15] Huang, R., Tlili, A., Chang, T. W., Zhang, L., & Zhuang, R. (2022). Developing and validating a scale for evaluating formative assessment activities in language learning. Computers & Education, 175, 104313. 
[16] Huang, S. L., & Shiu, J. H. (2012). A user-centric adaptive learning system for e-learning 2.0. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 214-225.
[17] Koehler, J. (2023, April 1). Cognitively charged learning for the 21st Century. Psychology Today. 
[18] Kuhail, M. A., El Madhoun, M. A., & Qasem, M. A. (2023). Chatbots in language education: A review of applications, advantages, and challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(1), 1-25.
[19] Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
[20] Li, C. Z. (2002). The coherence and cohesion in discourses in undergraduate English writing. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 164(11), 25-28.
[21] Liu, J. L., & Guo, P. J. (2013). An analysis of the incoherence and incohesion in undergraduate English writing. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University, 40, 153-156.
[22] Liu, K. P., Zhou, Y. F., & Cao, X. Y. (2003). A discussion of effective strategies to improve Chinese undergraduate students’ writing skills. Foreign Language Education, 24(6), 68-71.
[23] Liu, X. Y. (2010). Analyzing and reflecting on the English writing education for non-English majors. China Adult Education, 11, 163-164.
[24] Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics f the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(5), 570-581. 
[25] Lyu, B. P. (2013). A research report on undergraduate English writing education for non-English majors. Heilongjiang Social Sciences, 138(3), 156-158.
[26] Ma, W. Y. (2004). A corpus-based study about transfer of Chinese thinking patterns on English writing. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 6(s1), 74-77.
[27] Selvaraj, M., & Aziz, A. A. (2019). Systematic review: Approaches in teaching writing skill in ESL classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 450-473.
[28] Smutny, P., & Schreiberova, P. (2020). Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the 21st century. Computers & Education, 144, 103668. 
[29] Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage Publications.
[30] Wu, M. Z. (2001). Problems in undergraduate English writing and possible solutions. Journal of Yangzhou University, 5(1), 66-69.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.