Author(s)

Chunyan Qiu ¹, Yang Liu ¹, Yutong Liu ¹, Ziying Zhao ¹, Jianhua Jiang ^2,1

Affiliation(s)

¹ School of Management Science and Information Engineering, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun, 130117, China
² Jilin Province Key Laboratory of Fintech, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun, 130117, P. R. China

Corresponding Author

Yang Liu

ABSTRACT

The academic research and scientific research management play a key role in the scientific research direction, project application, transformation of scientific research achievements and academic exchanges of universities. In Australia, which is powerful in education, the industrialization of education with eight Australian schools as the core is becoming more and more complete, and its scientific research and talent cultivation mechanisms are becoming more scientific and efficient. The core of scientific research management in Australian universities is people-oriented, paying more attention to the cultivation of talents, and having a relatively complete scientific research platform management mechanism independent of universities. Concisely, in China, due to its large number of students, the Chinese universities often focus on basic teaching and curriculum settings. The number of scientific researchers in universities is scarce and there is a lack of a favourable scientific research environment. In recent years, with the gradual implementation of the construction of "double first-class" colleges and universities, the academic research and scientific research management of our country's universities have also been continuously developed. Taking the universities in Jilin Province as an example, this paper compares the academic research and scientific research management of universities in China and Australia, points out their advantages and disadvantages and puts forward some suggestions.

KEYWORDS

Academic Research, Scientific Research Management, Comparative Analysis

CITE THIS PAPER

Jianhua Jiang, Ziying Zhao, Yutong Liu, Chunyan Qiu and Yang Liu. Comparative Analysis of Academic Research and Scientific Research Management in Chinese and Australian Universities. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology (2021) 5: 92-98. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2021.52016

REFERENCES

[1] Chalmers, D. (2011) Progress and challenges to the recognition and reward of the Scholarship of Teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 25-38.
[2] Belkhodja, O., Landry, R. (2007) “The Triple-Helix collaboration: Why do researchers collaborate with industry and the government? What are the factors that influence the perceived barriers?” Scientometrics, 70(2).
[3] Anderson D, Johnson R, Milligan B. (1996) Performance-Based Funding of Universities. Canberra: National Board of Employment Education and Training.
[4] Geuna A, Martin B. R. (2003) University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison. Minerva, 41(4), 277-304.
[5] Australian Government. (2001) Backing Australia's Ability: An Innovation Action Plan for the Future. Canberra: Big Island Graphics and Corporate Communications ISR.
[6] Roberts G. (2004) Evaluation of Knowledge and Innovation Reforms Consultation Report. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.
[7] Australian Research Council. (2008) Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) Initiative. Canberra: Australian Government．
[8] Johnston R. (2006) Research Quality Assessment and Geography in Australia: Can Anything be Learned from the UK Experience? Geographical Research, 44(1), 1-11.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Curriculum and Teaching Methodology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education
  
  
• Adult and Higher Education