Author(s)

Qiuli Huang ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Haidian District, Beijing, China

Corresponding Author

Qiuli Huang

ABSTRACT

This paper critically examines the ramifications of managerialism on the academic profession within Chinese higher education, with a focus on the erosion of traditional academic values and structures. Through an in-depth literature review, it identifies three primary areas of concern: the crisis in academic identity, the reduction of professional autonomy, and the increasing alienation within academic work. The study reveals how the infusion of market dynamics and management practices into the educational sphere, a strategy aimed at enhancing efficiency and economy, fundamentally challenges the essence of academic work. It highlights a significant shift from collegial to corporatized governance, resulting in the commodification of academic labor and a departure from the tenure system towards more precarious employment models. Furthermore, the paper discusses the conflicting pressures faced by academics, who must navigate between professional commitments and managerial expectations, often at the expense of their scholarly pursuits and well-being. The findings underscore a deepening sense of insecurity among academics, as managerialist policies prompt a reevaluation of personal and collective academic identities. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on the impact of neoliberal policies on higher education, calling for a reassessment of managerialism's role in shaping academic careers and the future of scholarly work.

KEYWORDS

Managerialism, Academic identity, Professional autonomy, Academic work alienation, Chinese higher education

CITE THIS PAPER

Qiuli Huang, From Ivory Towers to Corporate Ladders: The Impact of Managerialism on Academic Profession. Adult and Higher Education (2024) Vol. 6: 159-165. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aduhe.2024.060124.

REFERENCES

[1] Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience. Oxford, Basil Blackwell Ltd.
[2] Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (2004). The Managerial State. London, SAGE Publications Ltd.
[3] Deem, R. (2000). 'New Managerialism' and the Management of UK Universities. End of Award Report of an Economic and Social Research Council project, award number: R000237661.
[4] Deem, R., Hillyard, S. and Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, Higher Education and the New Managerialism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
[5] Robinson, G. (2009). The 41st chair: Defining Careers in the Current Biomedical Research Environment. The Journal of Research Administration, XL (1), 101-130.
[6] Deem, R. and Brehony, K.J. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of new managerialism in Higher Education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 213-231.
[7] Zhang, Y. (2012). The plight of Western academic profession under the background of new managerialism. Higher Education Research, 33(4), 105-109.
[8] Huang, Y. and Peng, X. (2015). The change and persistence of Western academic profession in the process of new managerialism reform. Comparative Education Review, 37(2), 45-52.
[9] Sun, G. (2003). A review of managerialism in Western higher education management. Comparative Education Review, (10), 67-71.
[10] Lin, X. and Xue, Y. (2020). The macro logic of university personnel system reform and the micro-action of teachers' academic work: The game between audit culture and academic culture. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 38(4), 40-61.
[11] Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial University: organizational pathway of transformation. New York, Elsevier.
[12] Frandsen, S., Gotsi, M., Johnston, A., et al. (2018). Faculty responses to business school branding: a discursive approach. European Journal of Marketing, 52(1).
[13] Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49, 155-176.
[14] Wang, S. (2021). The change and persistence of global academic profession under the context of new managerialism: Based on the perspective of differentiation between organizational professionalism and occupational professionalism. Foreign Education Research, 48(6), 33-45.
[15] Knights, D. and Clarke, C.A. (2014). It's a Bittersweet Symphony, this Life: Fragile Academic Selves and Insecure Identities at Work. Organization Studies, 35(3), 335-357.
[16] Freidson, E. (1970). Profession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York, Dodd, Mead.
[17] Liu, S. (2006). Occupational autonomy and state intervention: A review of Western sociology of professions. Sociological Studies, 1, 197-221.
[18] Johnson, T.J. (1972). Professions and Power. London, MacMillan.
[19] Zhang, J. (2008). The free tribes of the university field: The development status and coping strategies of young university teachers. Doctoral dissertation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
[20] Musselin, C. (2013). How Peer Review Empowers the Academic Profession and University Managers: Changes in Relationships between the State, Universities and the Professoriate. Research Policy, 42(5), 1165-1174.
[21] Weber, M. (1999). Academic and political. Beijing, Sanlian Bookstore.
[22] Fleming, P. (2020). Dark Academia: Despair in the Neoliberal Business School. Journal of Management Studies, 57(6), 1305-1311.
[23] Butler, N. and Spoelstra, S. (2012). Your excellency. Organization, 19(6), 891-903.
[24] Grey, C. (2010). Organizing studies: publications, politics and polemic. Organization Studies, 31(6), 677-694.
[25] Alvesson, M. and Sandberg, J. (2013). Constructing Research Questions. Doing Interesting Research. London, Sage.
[26] Ren, K., Yu, X. and Wang, S. (2020). Survive first, then develop: Analysis of action logic about young teachers of arts in N University. Higher Education Exploration, (7), 106-113.
[27] Ren, M. and Liu, L. (2021). Insomnia in academia: Administrative logic and time pressure of young university teachers. China Youth Study, (8), 14-21+35.
[28] Harley, B. and Fleming, P. (2021). Not Even Trying to Change the World: Why Do Elite Management Journals Ignore the Major Problems Facing Humanity? The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(2), 133-152.
[29] Parker, M. (2021). Against management: Auto-critique. Organization, 13505084211020922.
[30] Alvesson, M. (2004). Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
[31] Cao, T. and Ren, K. (2020). How does evaluation affect the professionalism of young university teachers? A case study of S University. University Education Science, (2), 111-118.
[32] Watts, N.R. (2011). Burnout in University Teaching Staff: A Systematic Literature Review. Educational Research, 53(1), 33-50.
[33] Yan, G. (2018). The shadow behind the ivory tower: The occupational stress of university teachers and its impact on academic vitality. Higher Education Research, 39(4), 48-58.
[34] West, J.P. and Bowman, J.S. (2016). Electronic Surveillance at Work: An Ethical Analysis. Administration & Society, 48(5), 628-651.
[35] Huang, Y. (2015). Globalization and the reconstruction of academic identity of university teachers: Situational change and analytical framework. Foreign Education Research, 42(3), 86-97.
[36] Ambos, T.C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J., et al. (2008). When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1424-1447.
[37] Lam, A. (2011). What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: 'Gold', 'ribbon' or 'puzzle'? Research Policy, 15.
[38] Stephan, P. and Levin, S. (1992). Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place and Time. New York, Oxford University Press.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology
  
  
• Curriculum and Teaching Methodology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education