Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Sharing and Interaction of Communication: A Study of Internet Group Polarization from the Perspective of Cultural Studies

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/mediacr.2023.041108 | Downloads: 24 | Views: 311

Author(s)

Liu Yang 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Sichuan University of Media and Communication, 67 Xueyuan Street, Pidu District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611745, China

Corresponding Author

Liu Yang

ABSTRACT

The decentralization and interactivity of Internet communication is the starting point for understanding the polarization of public opinion groups. The internet community is often hindered by various public opinions and disputes, which make rational discussion more challenging. The cultural theory of communication reveals that culture is the core to maintain the existence of a society, and communication is the foundation of culture. This paper examines the technical and interactive characteristics of Internet public opinion polarization from the perspective of cultural theory, and then focuses on the governance of Internet group polarization in a shared and interactive way from the perspective of cultural communication.

KEYWORDS

Network circle, Group polarization, public opinion, Sharing, Interactivity

CITE THIS PAPER

Liu Yang, Sharing and Interaction of Communication: A Study of Internet Group Polarization from the Perspective of Cultural Studies. Media and Communication Research (2023) Vol. 4: 52-60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/mediacr.2023.041108.

REFERENCES

[1] CNNIC (2023) The 52nd Statistical Report on China's Internet Development. CNNIC, 25-26. 
[2] Berners-Lee, Tim (2000) Weaving the Web: The Past, Present and Future of the World Wide Web by its Inventor. Texere, 3.
[3] Wei Long (2021) Return to Dialogue: Research on the Resolution Path of Network Group Polarization Phenomenon. Journalism Research, 10, 30-43. 
[4] Levy Pierre (2001) Cyberculture. University of Minnesota Press, 61.
[5] Yang Guang (2022) Does Smart Media Exacerbate Public Opinion Polarization?- Based on the Analysis of Media Technology, Information Characteristics, and Individual Psychology. Youth Journalist, 18, 15-19. 
[6] Baran, S.J., Davis, D.K. (2003) Mass Communication Theory: Foundations, Ferment and Future. Belmont, 244-245.
[7] Antonio Gramsci (1992) Selected Works of Gramsci 1916-1935. People's Publishing House, 10. 
[8] Wang Shiyong, Yu Jiaqi (2022) Summary of Research on the Phenomenon of Networking Groups. Journal of Intelligence, 5, 86-91.
[9] Deng Zhiqiang (2020) Issues and Prospects of Network Circle Research. Youth Research, 3, 46-51. 
[10] He Bifu (2018) Grasp the Initiative of "Network Circle" Public Opinion Guidance. People's Tribune, 19, 108-109.
[11] Loecherbach, F., Trilling, D. (2020) Developing a Framework for Researching Recommender Systems and Their Effects. Computational Communication Research, 1-2. 
[12] Wu Shu (2018) The Influence of Network Circle on College Students' Cultural Self-confidence and its Cultivation Path. Journal of Shanxi Institute of Energy, 3, 103-105.
[13] Xing Yunfei, Wang Xinwei (2022) A Review of Research on Group Polarization in Social Media Abroad. Information Science, 9, 176-184.
[14] Cui, X., Hu, Y., Ding, X.F., Wu, Y., Wu, R.J. (2011) Research on the Mechanism of Network Public Opinion Guidance Based on SNA Point Degree. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 1, 104-108. 
[15] Caray, J.W. (1975) A Cultural Approach to Communication. Communication, 2, 2-22. 
[16] Liu Hailong (2008) Mass Communication Theory: Paradigms and Schools.  China Renmin University Press, 27-28.
[17] Terry Flew, Ye Mingrui (Inter.) (2019) New Media (Fourth Edition). People's Daily Press, 25-53. 
[18] McLuhan, M., He D. K. (Inter.) (2011) Understanding Media: the Extensions of Man. YiLin Press.
[19] Neil Postman (1986) Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. Penguin. 
[20] Cass R. Sunstein (2006) Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. Oxford University Press. 
[21] Ma Haijiao, Deng Wenxi (2022) Research on the Generation Mechanism of Network Group Polarization on Social Media Platform. Youth Journalist, 17, 38-40.
[22] Katz, E., Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1955) Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Communications. Free Press.
[23] Yardi, s., Boyd, D. (2010) Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization over Time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, 5, 316-327. 
[24] Jacques Derrida, Wang, J.T. (Inter.) (2015) Of Grammatology. Shanghai Translation Publishing House.
[25] Saussure, F.D. (1968) Cours de Linguistique Générale. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2. 
[26] Stuart Hall, Xu, L., Lu X.H. (Inter.) (2013) Representation: Cultural Repressentations and Signifying Practices. The Commercial Press, 2-25.
[27] Zheng Wenfeng (2022) Re-understanding of Media Literacy Education in Circle Communication. Youth Journalist, 18, 35-37. 
[28] CTRChina (2023) 2023 First Half of the Mainstream Media Network Communication Power List. CTRChina, https://www.ctrchina.cn/rich/report/568.
[29] Luo G., Liu, X.Y. (2000) Cultural Studies: An Essential Reader. China Social Sciences Press, 30. 
[30] Faules, D.F., Alexander, D.C. (1978) Communication and Social Behavior: A Symbolic Interaction Perspective. Addison Wesley, 3, 6-12.
[31] Guo Lu (2022) The "Fan Circle" Strategy of Mainstream Media under the Background of Media Convergence—Taking People's Daily as an Example. Journalism Lover, 4, 57-59.
[32] Gerbner, G., Gross L., Morgan, M., Signorielli, N. (1980) The "Mainstreaming" of America: Violence Profile. Journal of Comnmunication, 30, 14.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.