Death of Despair and the Destruction of Neoliberalism in East Asia: Economic Development, Democratization, and Social Pressure in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan
DOI: 10.23977/jsoce.2023.050912 | Downloads: 19 | Views: 316
Author(s)
Hao Du 1
Affiliation(s)
1 Faculty of Social Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5L5, Canada
Corresponding Author
Hao DuABSTRACT
Japan, South Korea and Taiwan (China) successively achieved economic miracles and political democratisation between the 1960s and 1990s. The international community attributes these achievements to the application of neoliberalism in East Asia. However, neoliberalism brought not only economic success but also destruction, which, along with the traditions of East Asian societies, resulted in more severe political consequences in civil society. This paper argues that in East Asian societies, democracy is the result of economic development and not the other way round, while further exploring the application of the concept of death of despair in East Asian societies and providing a critical review of the neoliberal paradigm.
KEYWORDS
Neoliberalism, Comparative Politics in East Asia, Death of Despair, East Asian Economic Miracle, DemocratizationCITE THIS PAPER
Hao Du, Death of Despair and the Destruction of Neoliberalism in East Asia: Economic Development, Democratization, and Social Pressure in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology (2023) Vol. 5: 65-70. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jsoce.2023.050912.
REFERENCES
[1] Case A, Deaton A. Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism [M]. Princeton University Press, 2020.
[2] Power H, Power S. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science [J]. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2008, 616: 110.
[3] Steger M B, Roy R K. Neoliberalism: A very short introduction [M]. Oxford University Press, USA, 2010.
[4] Popa M. Political machines and the institutional background of economic miracles [J]. Government and Opposition, 2021, 56(2): 345-364.
[5] Riedl R B, Slater D, Wong J, et al. Authoritarian-led democratization [J]. Annual Review of Political Science, 2020, 23: 315-332.
[6] Yoshimatsu H. State-Market relations in East Asia and institution-building in the Asia-Pacific [J]. East Asia, 2000, 18(1): 5-33.
[7] Ji Y. Asian families at the crossroads: A meeting of east, west, tradition, modernity, and gender [J]. Journal of Marriage and Family, 2015, 77(5): 1031-1038.
[8] Lukacs G. Labor games: youth, work, and politics in East Asia [J]. Positions: east Asia cultures critique, 2015, 23(3): 381-409.
[9] Yamauchi T, Yoshikawa T, Takamoto M, et al. Overwork-related disorders in Japan: recent trends and development of a national policy to promote preventive measures [J]. Industrial health, 2017, 55(3): 293-302.
[10] Thomas M K, Yang W L. Neoliberalism, globalization, and creative educational destruction in Taiwan [J]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2013, 61: 107-129.
Downloads: | 17429 |
---|---|
Visits: | 461803 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
-
Information and Knowledge Management
-
Military and Armament Science
-
Media and Communication Research
-
Journal of Human Movement Science
-
Art and Performance Letters
-
Lecture Notes on History
-
Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
-
Philosophy Journal
-
Science of Law Journal
-
Journal of Political Science Research
-
Advances in Broadcasting