Author(s)

Heng Xie ¹, Jing Li ¹, Shuo Liu ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang, China

Corresponding Author

Shuo Liu

ABSTRACT

To achieve carbon peak and neutrality targets, the construction of green, low-carbon and efficient energy system has become a trend. The power battery enterprise, as a green energy source, has attracted much attention and how to evaluate its value has become a hot topic. This paper aims to find a suitable value assessment model for power battery enterprises. The paper first examines the traits of power battery businesses before weighing the benefits and drawbacks of several assessment models so that select the best one for power battery businesses. Second, after conducting a detailed financial research of CATL (Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited), we discovered that the company possesses the unique traits of power battery firms. Consequently, using the financial data for CATL in 2022 as an example, this study draws on the value assessment ideas of Metcalfe theory in the Internet business. We revises the Guotai Junan model, and offers fresh concepts for the value evaluation of power battery enterprises.

KEYWORDS

Power battery; enterprise value assessment; CATL

CITE THIS PAPER

Heng Xie, Jing Li, Shuo Liu, Research on Power Battery Enterprise Value Assessment Model: Taking CATL as an Example. Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management (2023) Vol. 6: 24-36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/ieim.2023.060905.

REFERENCES

[1] Xu W. L., & Wu X. L. (2023). Valuation of growing Internet enterprises based on the improved Metcalfe model: Take Tiger Live as an example. Jiangsu Business Theory, 4, 17-23 + 42. 
[2] Zhang J., & Li B. Q. (2012). Application of real option method in enterprise valuation and analysis of advantages and disadvantages. Contemporary Economics, 18, 140-142. 
[3] Sun J. X. (2021). Application of modified EVA method and real option method in power battery enterprise value evaluation. Master's Thesis & Southwest University of Finance and Economics. 
[4] Xu L. F., & Wang X. J. (2022). Research on the value evaluation model of energy storage enterprises: A case study of NATL. Friends of Accounting, 15, 18-25. 
[5] Zhao Z. W., & Li Q. (2022). Value evaluation of electric power enterprises based on real option method under dual-carbon strategy. Green Technology, 13, 234-239. 
[6] Sun W. Q., Pei L., Xiang W., Sang B. Y., Li G. J., & Xi P. F. (2019). System value evaluation method of energy storage in power system. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 8, 47-55. 
[7] Wang S. Y. (2023). Valuation of CATL. Cooperative Economy and Technology, 7, 108-110. 
[8] Kaplan S. N., & Zingales L. (2000). Investmen-cash flow Sensitibeties are not Valid Measures of Financing Constraints. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 20, 707-712. 
[9] Qu T. A. (2022). Valuation of new energy battery enterprises based on DCF model: CATL Company as an example. International Business Accounting, 14, 86-88. 
[10] Wang L. (2022). The overseas business layout of NATL accelerated. New Energy Science and Technology, 12, 17-18. 

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Information Systems and Economics
  
  
• Accounting, Auditing and Finance
  
  
• Tourism Management and Technology Economy
  
  
• Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
  
  
• Financial Engineering and Risk Management
  
  
• Accounting and Corporate Management
  
  
• Social Security and Administration Management
  
  
• Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
  
  
• Statistics & Quantitative Economics
  
  
• Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
  
  
• Social Medicine and Health Management
  
  
• Land Resource Management
  
  
• Information, Library and Archival Science
  
  
• Journal of Human Resource Development
  
  
• Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
  
  
• Operational Research and Cybernetics