Author(s)

Bing Zhou ¹, Qiang Liu ¹, Yu Guo ², Chunmei Cheng ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ School of Economics and Management, LiaoningUniversity of Technology, Jinzhou, Liaoning, China, 121001
² School of Economics and Management, HarbinEngineeringUniversity, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China, 150001

Corresponding Author

Bing Zhou

ABSTRACT

In the context of today's "Quality Powerful Country" strategy, the importance of "quality" is self-evident. Unswervingly building a high-quality country is an inevitable requirement for high-quality development. Therefore, high-quality development has become the goal pursued by many manufacturing companies, which also highlights the important position of quality improvement teams in manufacturing companies. In order to make the quality improvement team of a manufacturing company operate quickly and efficiently, the health of the immune system of the quality improvement team of the manufacturing company should first be improved. Therefore, this study aims at related issues, uses the principle of bionics, takes the quality improvement team of the manufacturing company as the research object, and takes the acquired immunity as the starting point. It conducts research around the three elements of tissue quality acquired immunity, and explores how the quality improvement team of the manufacturing company can obtain The operating mechanism of the health of the immune system, the pre-dependent variables are selected as self-quality supervision, organizational learning ability, and organizational forgetting; the mediating variables are organizational quality monitoring, defense and memory; the moderating variable is internal control; the outcome variable is immune system health, common Construct its theoretical model and study its operating mechanism. The study of this mechanism not only provides a relevant theoretical basis for the healthy operation of the immune system of the quality improvement team, but also makes a great contribution to the realization of the high-quality development of manufacturing enterprises.

KEYWORDS

Quality improvement team, Acquired immunity, System health, Operating mechanism

CITE THIS PAPER

Bing Zhou, Qiang Liu, Yu Guo and Chunmei Cheng, Operating Mechanism of Acquired Immune System Health of Quality Improvement Team in Manufacturing Enterprises. Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management (2021) 1: 22-28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/ieim.2021.040103

REFERENCES

[1] Feng X B. Research on quality improvement team's cross-border behavior and its mechanism. Zhejiang University, 2012.
[2] Feng X B, Mei S J. The relationship between cross-border behavior and performance of quality improvement teams: the mediating role of team efficacy. Ergonomics, 2013, 19(03): 36-40.
[3] Luo J D. Social Network Structure and Performance of Improvement Teams. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 2005, 7(2): 208-223.
[4] Gibson C B, Early P C. Collective Cognition in Action: Accumulation, Interaction, Examination, and Accommodation in the Development and Operation of Group Efficacy Beliefs in the Workplace. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(2): 438-458.
[5] Xu H, Ji C L, Li J, Zhou B, Jin X. Research on the Risk Response Mechanism of Technology-based Small and Medium-sized Enterprises from the Perspective of Tissue Immunity. Management World, 2011(02): 142-154.
[6] Yang Z N, Wang Y H. The construction of immune-based tissue health defense mechanism: a case. Nankai Management Review, 2008, 11(05): 102-112.
[7] Wang Y H, Lv P, Xu B, Yang Z N, Su X Y, Du D B, Song Z C, Duan X G. A preliminary study on tissue immunity. Science of Science and Management of Science and Technology, 2006(06): 133-139.
[8] Lv P, Wang Y H. Research on corporate adaptability from the perspective of tissue immunity. Scientific Research Management, 2008(01): 164-171.
[9] Lv P, Wang Y H. Research on the behavior and mechanism of tissue immunity. Chinese Journal of Management, 2009, 6(05): 607-614.
[10] Lu P. An empirical study on the mechanism of organizational immune behavior on organizational performance. Science and Technology Management, 2011, 32(07): 15-23.
[11] Chen H, Xu R S, Yin Y F. Research on Distributed Innovation, Organization Specific Immunity and Enterprise Growth Performance. Science and Technology Progress and Policy, 2014, 31(12): 98-104.
[12] Shi L P, Liu Q, Wu K J, Du Z W. The mechanism of the consistency of the structural elements of the organization quality-specific immunity on the quality performance: an empirical analysis based on the PP method, the fit method and the hierarchical regression analysis. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2013, 18(03): 84-91.
[13] Shi L P, Liu Q, Jia Y N, Yu X Q. Optimization of quality performance improvement path based on Projection Pursuit-RAGA-NK-GERT——an interpretation framework based on organizational quality-specific immunity and product life cycle. Operations Research and Management, 2015, 24(04): 188-197.
[14] Xue X L, Niu X F. Research on the immune system health evaluation of major engineering teams based on coordinated development. Chinese Management Science, 2018, 26(08): 186-196.
[15] Song S X. The important role of product quality supervision and inspection. Mechanical Engineer, 1992(02): 44.
[16] Sun Y, Mao W, Zhang J S, Zhang P P. Research on the impact of science and technology service enterprises' network capabilities on service innovation capabilities: the moderating effect of organizational learning capabilities. Journal of Hebei University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2020, 12(04): 16-25.
[17] Aragon-Correa J A, Cordon-Pozo E. Leadership and organizational learning's role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain. Industrial Marketing Management, 2007, 36(3): 349-359.
[18] Gherardi S, Nicolini D. The Organizational Learning of Safety in Communities of Practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2000, 9(1), 7-18.
[19] Cao P, Xing M Q. The impact of the new generation of employees’ emotional commitment on organizational learning ability and work performance: the mediating role of organizational culture. Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Trade, 2020, 41(03): 99-108.
[20] Wei L Y, Wang G G, Lou X M. Research on the Improvement of Organizational Learning Ability and Innovation Performance Management Mechanism of Knowledge-intensive Service Enterprises. Business Managers, 2020(04): 68-69.
[21] Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1): 128-152.
[22] Holan P M D, Phillips N. Remembrance of Things Past? The Dynamics of Organizational Forgetting. Management Science, 2004, 50(11): 1603-1613.
[23] Shen B, Lu Y F, Wu T. The impact of organizational learning on knowledge innovation: organizational forgetting as an intermediary. Management Review, 2020, 32(12): 135-145.
[24] Zhang X D, Zhao Y P, Zheng Z X, Wu Y J. Organizational forgetting and corporate strategic transformation: a regulated intermediary model . Research and Development Management, 2017, 29(05): 22-33.
[25] Wang L P, Zhao F Y. Organization forgetting, relationship learning, enterprise openness and business model innovation. Scientific Research Management, 2016, 37(03): 42-50.
[26] Li L, Tian S Y. Internal control, innovation input and corporate performance. Friends of Accounting, 2021(03): 124-128.
[27] Oliver C. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16(1): 145-179.
[28] Xie M N. Analysis of the internal control of small and medium-sized enterprises from the perspective of strategic management. Small and medium-sized enterprises management and technology (first issue), 2021(01): 5-6.
[29] Yang Q X, Liao T T. Research on the relationship between internal control, technological innovation and value creation ability. Chinese Journal of Management, 2017(8): 90-98.
[30] Shi L P, Liu Q, Teng Y. Quality performance improvement path based on OSI-PP-Enter: theoretical framework and empirical analysis. Journal of Management Engineering, 2015, 29(03): 152-163.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Information Systems and Economics
  
  
• Accounting, Auditing and Finance
  
  
• Tourism Management and Technology Economy
  
  
• Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
  
  
• Financial Engineering and Risk Management
  
  
• Accounting and Corporate Management
  
  
• Social Security and Administration Management
  
  
• Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
  
  
• Statistics & Quantitative Economics
  
  
• Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
  
  
• Social Medicine and Health Management
  
  
• Land Resource Management
  
  
• Information, Library and Archival Science
  
  
• Journal of Human Resource Development
  
  
• Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
  
  
• Operational Research and Cybernetics