Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Non-Financial Sector Debt and Economic Growth: A Literature Review

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/accaf.2023.040110 | Downloads: 6 | Views: 240

Author(s)

Xiaoxue Zhang 1, Shizheng Li 2

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Management Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, China
2 School of Finance, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, China

Corresponding Author

Xiaoxue Zhang

ABSTRACT

In 2022, the global non-financial sector debt surged to 3.1 times the GDP, reflecting the result of the reliance of various countries' real economic sectors on debt-driven economic growth since the 2007-2008 financial crisis. How does debt affect economic growth? This question has sparked numerous theoretical and empirical studies in academia. This article uses "debt" and "economic growth" as keywords or titles in both Chinese and English to retrieve literature from renowned academic databases such as CNKI and EBSCO ASP. Based on the collected literature, the article categorizes them into four types according to research themes. The article also focuses on the development and trends of research projects related to debt and economic growth funded by the Chinese National Social Science Fund over the past five years. Therefore, our work contributes to providing a systematic understanding of how non-financial sector debt influences economic growth at the macroeconomic level.

KEYWORDS

Public debt; economic growth; debt overhang

CITE THIS PAPER

Xiaoxue Zhang, Shizheng Li, Non-Financial Sector Debt and Economic Growth: A Literature Review. Accounting, Auditing and Finance (2023) Vol. 4: 65-69. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/accaf.2023.040110.

REFERENCES

[1] Zhao X. Q., & Chen X. (2018). A study of the nonlinear effects of government debt on economic growth. Studies of International Finance, 2, 54-65.
[2] Dosi G., Fagiolo G., Napoletano M., Roventini A., & Treibich T (2015). Fiscal and monetary policies in complex evolving economies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 52, 166-189.
[3] Blanchard O. (2019). Public debt and low interest rates. American Economic Review, 109(4), 1197-1229.
[4] Reinhart C. M., & Rogoff K. S (2010). Growth in a Time of Debt. American economic review, 100(2), 573-578.
[5] Herndon T., Ash M., & Pollin R (2014). Does high public debt consistently stifle economic growth? A critique of Reinhart and Rogoff. Cambridge journal of economics, 38(2), 257-279.
[6] Hansen B. E (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of econometrics, 93(2), 345-368.
[7] Hansen B. E (2000). Sample splitting and threshold estimation. Econometrica, 68(3), 575-603.
[8] Hansen B. E (2017). Regression kink with an unknown threshold. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 35(2), 228-240.
[9] González A., Teräsvirta T., & Van Djik D. Panel Smooth Transition Regression Models. Stockholm School of Economics, The Economic Research Institute (EFI); Stockholm, Sweden: 2005. SSE/EFI Working Paper, (604). 
[10] Sanusi K. A., Hassan A. S., & Meyer D. F (2019). Non-linear Effects of Public Debt on Economic Growth in Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) Countries. International Journal of Economics & Management, 13(1), 193-202.
[11] Bouchrara K., Rachdi H., & Guesmi K (2020). The non-linear relationship between economic growth and public debt. Economics Bulletin, 40(3), 2336-2343.
[12] Pradhan R. P., Arvin M. B., Nair M., & Hall J. H (2022). Public debt, economic openness, and sustainable economic growth in Europe: a dynamic panel causal analysis. Journal of Economic Development, 47(1), 167-183.
[13] Doğan İ., & Bilgili F (2014). The non-linear impact of high and growing government external debt on economic growth: A Markov Regime-switching approach. Economic Modelling, 39, 213-220.
[14] Su M (2021). Research on the nonlinear impact of public debt on economic growth: An empirical analysis based on panel data of 135 countries. South China Finance, 536(4), 16-29.
[15] Xu J. J., & Yao Y. J (2019). The nonlinear and heterogeneous effects of the local government's debts on economic growth. Finance Forum, 24(11), 33-43.
[16] Huang Y. R., Lu Z. Q., & Li Z. B. (2018). The relationship among local government debt, regional financial difference and economic growth: A study based on nonlinear PSTR model. Modern Economic Science, 40(3), 1-12.
[17] Zhuang J. Q., Chen Z. Y., & Xie H. T (2017). A study on the nonlinear growth effect of local government debt in China. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 395(10), 34-45.
[18] Li D. D (2017). Empirical testing of the nonlinear relationship between local government debt and macroeconomic growth. Statistics & Decision, 486(18), 160-163.
[19] Zhu W. W (2014). Research on the nonlinear relationship between local government debt and regional economic growth in China. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 189(12), 24-30.
[20] Puente-Ajovín M., & Sanso-Navarro M (2015). Granger causality between debt and growth: Evidence from OECD countries. International Review of Economics & Finance, 35, 66-77.
[21] Di Sanzo S., & Bella M (2015). Public debt and growth in the euro area: evidence from parametric and nonparametric Granger causality. The BE Journal of Macroeconomics, 15(2), 631-648.
[22] Diks C., & Panchenko V (2006). A new statistic and practical guidelines for nonparametric Granger causality testing. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 30(9-10), 1647-1669.
[23] De Vita G., Trachanas E., & Luo Y (2018). Revisiting the bi-directional causality between debt and growth: Evidence from linear and nonlinear tests. Journal of International Money and Finance, 83, 55-74.
[24] Kruse R (2011). A new unit root test against ESTAR based on a class of modified statistics. Statistical Papers, 52, 71-85.
[25] Afonso A., & Hauptmeier S (2009). Public debt and economic growth: A granger causality panel data approach (No. 2009/24). ISEG-Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
[26] Beck T. (2012) The role of finance in economic development–benefits, risks, and politics (Vol. 2011, pp. 161-203). New York: Oxford University Press. 
[27] Finck D., & Rudel P. (2023) Do credit supply shocks have asymmetric effects? Empirical Economics, 64(4), 1559-1597.
[28] Zheng C. J., Chen S. Y., & Qian N. N (2023). Economic fluctuation, local debt risk and risk taking of urban commercial banks. Operations Research and Management Science, 32(6), 205-211.
[29] Liu Z. X., Guo J. J., & Chen W. Z (2022). A debt-asset price theory of macroeconomic leverage and economic growth. Economic Research Journal, 57(10), 35-51.  
[30] Wang H. J., Liu Y. H., & Yu M. Z (2023). A study on the cross departmental spillover effect of Chinese household debt risk. Studies of International Finance, 429(1), 28-39.
[31] Jordà Ò., Kornejew M., Schularick M., & Taylor A. M (2022). Zombies at large? Corporate debt overhang and the macroeconomy. The Review of Financial Studies, 35(10), 4561-4586.
[32] Brunnermeier M., & Krishnamurthy A (2020). Corporate debt overhang and credit policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 447-502.
[33] Garber G., Mian A., Ponticelli J., & Sufi A (2019). Household debt and recession in Brazil. In Handbook of US Consumer Economics (pp. 97-119). Academic Press.
[34] Meng X. C., & Zhang Y. S (2021). Family debt, real estate price channels, and economic fluctuations in China. Economic Research Journal, 56(5), 75-90.
[35] He D. X., & Zhang B. B (2021). Leverage in the household sector and corporate debt risk. China Industry Economics, 395(2), 155-173.

Downloads: 3503
Visits: 34504

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.