Author(s)

Wei Huang ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ School of the English Language and Culture, Xiamen University Tan Kah Kee College, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China

Corresponding Author

Wei Huang

ABSTRACT

Socrates and Confucius are two great men whose philosophy or doctrines respectively shaped Western and Eastern civilizations. As educators, they share similarities and at the same time differ in significant ways. Both of them love knowledge, believing the starting point of learning is to have correct self-knowledge, and having faith in the attainability of knowledge, but their belief on the location of the source of knowledge and the ways to get it differ. Both of them value virtue, and made themselves examples of virtue before exhorting others to love and practice it, but their conceptions of the relations between virtue and knowledge differ. Both of them have concern for others and are willing to shoulder their missions to improve the societies they live, but their ways to love others and their missions differ. However, all these differences cannot eclipse and obscure the two great educator's major similarities: their genuine love and concern for the fate of the humanity. Knowledge and virtue hold the promise to improve human condition, and love for others and dedication to the society could further improve the wellbeing of human beings.

KEYWORDS

Socrates, Confucius, Love, Knowledge, Virtue

CITE THIS PAPER

Wei Huang, The Love of the Two Great Educators: Socrates and Confucius. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology (2023) Vol. 5: 79-86. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jsoce.2023.050712.

REFERENCES

[1] Kyrylov V, Bonanni C, Kyrylova T, et al. Advanced simulation gaming technology and business education.  2011.
[2] Chuah Julie S.C. Singh Manjet Kaur Mehar, Goh Sze Ying. "International Students' English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Learning Styles: Socratic and Confucianistic." Academic Research International, Vol. 5, No.5, 2014: 262-269.
[3] Feng Youlan, Tu Youguang. trans. "The Brief History of Chinese Philosophy". Zhonghua Shuju (Chinese Book House), 2017.1. 
[4] George Lynda. "Socrates on Teaching: Looking Back to Move Education Forward." Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015: 3970 – 3974.
[5] Huang Yong. "Can Virtue Be Taught and How? Confucius on the Paradox of Moral Education." Journal of Moral Education, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2011:141–159.
[6] Kuhtmann Marlene S. "Socratic Self-examination and Its Application to Academic Advising." NACADA Journal, Vol. 25, Issue 2, 2005: 37-48.
[7] Mintz Avi. "The Midwife as Matchmaker: Socrates and Relational Pedagogy." Philosophy of Education 2007:91-97.
[8] Nylan Michael, ed. The Analects: A Norton Critical Edition, W.W. Norton & Company, 2014.
[9] Plato. Ferrari G. R. F. ed. and Griffith Tom. trans. The Republic. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[10] Plato. Leibowitz, David. ed. Apology. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[11] Plato. Rowe, Christopher. ed. Theaetetus and Sophist. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
[12] Plato. Sedley, David. and Long, Alex. ed. Meno and Phaedo. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
[13] Reich Rob. "Confusion about the Socratic Method: Socratic Paradoxes and Contemporary Invocations of Socrates." Philosophy of Education 1998: 68-78.
[14] Ryu Kuing. "The Teachings of Confucius: A Humanistic Adult Education Perspective." Adult Education Research Conference, 2008. 
[15] Wu Guozhen ed. & trans. "The Latest Annotated Translation of the Analects". Fujian Education Publishing House, 2012. 4.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
  
  
• Information and Knowledge Management
  
  
• Military and Armament Science
  
  
• Media and Communication Research
  
  
• Journal of Human Movement Science
  
  
• Art and Performance Letters
  
  
• Lecture Notes on History
  
  
• Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
  
  
• Philosophy Journal
  
  
• Science of Law Journal
  
  
• Journal of Political Science Research
  
  
• Advances in Broadcasting