Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. MEDS Clinical Medicine
  4. Vol 4, Issue 4, 2023

Clinical Comparison of Cardiac Function between Dual Chamber Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Regional Pacing

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/medsc.2023.040409 | Downloads: 30 | Views: 508

Author(s)

Fubao Zhang 1, Yiling Li 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Beiyin, No. 222 Silong Road, Baiyin District, Baiyin, Gansu, 730999, China

Corresponding Author

Yiling Li

ABSTRACT

To observe the changes of heart-related indexes after left bundle branch pacemaker implantation and traditional pacemaker implantation, and to explore the advantages and disadvantages of both. In this study, 47 patients were selected by inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 19 patients in the left bundle branch pacing group and 28 patients in the biventricular pacing group. Cardiac function indexes were compared between the two groups for half a year before and after pacemaker implantation. There was no significant difference in the related indicators between the two groups before pacemaker implantation (P > 0.05). However, half a year after implantation, the results of fractional shortening, ejection fraction, LEDV (left ventricular end-diastolic volume)and NT-ProBNP were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05).Left bundle branch area pacing has a better cardiac function recovery than conventional pacing.

KEYWORDS

Left bundle branch regional pacing; dual chamber pacing; cardiac function

CITE THIS PAPER

Fubao Zhang, Yiling Li, Clinical Comparison of Cardiac Function between Dual Chamber Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Regional Pacing. MEDS Clinical Medicine (2023) Vol. 4: 61-65. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/medsc.2023.040409.

REFERENCES

[1] Greenspon AJ, Patel JD, Lau E, et al. Trends in permanent pacemaker implantation in the United States from 1993 to 2009. J A m Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60(16):1540-1545. 
[2] Timmis A, Townsend N, Gale C, Grobbee R, Maniadakis N, Flather M, Wilkins E, Wright L, Vos R, Bax J, Blum M, Pinto F, Vardas P, ESC Scientific Document Group. European Society of Cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2017. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 508-579. 
[3] Bradshaw PJ, Stobie P, Knuiman MW, Briffa TG, Hobbs MS. Trends in the incidence and prevalence of cardiac pacemaker insertions in an ageing population. Open Heart 2014; 1:e000177. 
[4] Goldenberg I, Kutyifa V, Klein Hu, et al. Survival with cardiacresynchronization therapy in mild heart failure. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1694-1701. 
[5] Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1539-1549. 
[6] Sharma PS, Naperkowski A, Bauch TD, et al. Permanent His bundle pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2018; 11:e006613. 
[7] Bhatt AG, Musat DL, Milstein N, et al. The effificacy of His bundle pacing: lessons learned from implementation for the fifirst time at an experienced electrophysiology center. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2018; 4: 1397-1406. 
[8] Teigeler T, Kolominsky J, Vo C, et al. Intermediate-term performance and safety of His-bundle pacing leads: a single-center experience. Heart Rhythm 2021; 18:743-749. 
[9] Huang W, Su L, Wu S, et al. A novel pacing strategy with low and stable output: pacing the left bundle branch immediately beyond the conduction block. Can J Cardiol 2017; 33: 1736. 
[10] Huang W, Chen X, Su L, Wu S, Xia X, Vijayaraman P. A beginner's guide to permanent left bundle branch pacing. Heart Rhythm 2019; 16:1791-1796. 
[11] Vijayaraman P, Subzposh FA, Naperkowski A, et al. Prospective evaluation of feasibility and electrophysiologic and echocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing. Heart Rhythm 2019; 16: 1774-1782. 
[12] Vijayaraman P, Ponnusamy S, Cano O, et al. Left bundle branch area pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2021; 7: 135-147. 
[13] Huang W, Wu S, Vijayaraman P, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy using left bundle branch pacing. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2020; 6: 849-858. 
[14] Jastrzebski M, Moskal P, Bednarek A, et al. Programmed deep septal stimulation: a novel maneuver for the diagnosis of left bundle branch capture during permanent pacing. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2020; 31:4 85-493. 
[15] Kusumoto F M, Schoenfeld M H, Barrett C, et al. 2018ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2019, 16(9): e128-226. 
[16] Li X, Li H, Ma W, et al. Permanent left bundle branch area pacing for atrioventricular block: Feasibility, safety, and acute effect. Heart Rhythm. 2019; 16: 1766-1773.

Subscription
E-Mail Alert
Most popular papers
Call for Special Issue
Publication Ethics & OA Statement
Plagiarism Policy
Contact Us
Downloads: 4674
Visits: 203933

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.