Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

The Study of Relationship between Freedom and Morality

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jsoce.2023.050414 | Downloads: 6 | Views: 370

Author(s)

Xijun Wang 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Ideological and Political Theory Department, Changsha Vocational & Technical College, Changsha, Hunan, 410217, China

Corresponding Author

Xijun Wang

ABSTRACT

Freedom has complex and diverse connotations. With factors that oppose and coexist with freedom as a reference, freedom can be divided according to four dimensions, namely, the dimension of restriction imposed by others, the dimension of restriction from individual capability and desire, the dimension of restriction from objective law and dimension of restriction from religious belief. A four-dimensional analysis of freedom is made with reference to constraints that oppose freedom. Based on politics, religion, individual utility and good inter-subject relationship, morality is divided into four systems. By analyzing the different connotations of freedom and morality and the nature of the reflected relationship, corresponding correlations and matching are made to infer and demonstrate the relationship between freedom and morality. The freedom of rational free people who get rid of constraints from traditional politics, religion and individual utility is the premise and law for the formation of free morality.

KEYWORDS

Freedom, morality, good Inter-subject relationship, relationship

CITE THIS PAPER

Xijun Wang, The Study of Relationship between Freedom and Morality. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology (2023) Vol. 5: 88-97. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jsoce.2023.050414.

REFERENCES

[1] Abraham Lincoln, The Writings of Abraham Lincoln, ed. A. B. Lapsley [New York, 1906], Ⅷ, 121.
[2] Shaoping Gan, An Ethical Examination of "Escape from Freedom". Morality and Civilization, 2019, No. 4, pp.11.
[3] Friedrich August von Hayek, Freedom Charter, translated by Yang Yusheng et al., Beijing, China Social Sciences Press, 2017-11, pp.30.
[4] Xijun Wang, Bengang Zhao, On Four Ethical and Moral Systems, Frontiers, No. 11, 2014, pp. 68-69.
[5] Yanzhang Zeng: "The Moral Effect behind the Construction of the Social Good Law System", "Seeker", No. 10, 2010. pp. 119-121.
[6] Xijun Wang. Ethics Research Should Orient to Relational Nature and Public Domain. Journal of Hunan Administration Institute, No. 9, 2017, pp. 110-112.
[7] Xiaoying Liu, Feng Liu. On the Development of Freedom and Equality Concepts before the French Revolution. Study & Exploration, 1999 (4), pp. 74-77.
[8] Immanuel Kant. An Anthology of Criticism of Historical Reason. translated by He Zhaowu. Beijing: Commercial Press, 1997, pp. 60-67.
[9] Jiaming Chen. Fifteen Lectures on Modernity and Postmodernity. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2006.
[10] Sasaki Takeshi, Kim Tea-Chang, editor-in-chief, translated by Bian Chongdao, Wang Qing, and Diao Liu, Prospects of Public Philosophy in the 21st Century, Beijing, People's Publishing House, June 2009, pp. 9. 

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.