Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Spatial Effects of Digital Economy and Foreign Direct Investment—A U-shaped relationship

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/infse.2023.040205 | Downloads: 45 | Views: 584

Author(s)

Liang Enshuo 1, Liu Xiaoqi 2

Affiliation(s)

1 Investment Project Management Institute of Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian, Liaoning, China
2 Nanjing Normal University Giling College, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Corresponding Author

Liang Enshuo

ABSTRACT

Is the development of digital economy necessarily beneficial to foreign direct investment (FDI)? Based on panel data of Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2011-2019, the article empirically tests the spatial spillover effects between the digital economy and FDI using a two-way fixed effects model. The results show that FDI inflows between cities have significant spatial correlation, and a city's digital economy development level has an inverted U-shaped relationship with its geographic and economic proximity to urban FDI inflows.

KEYWORDS

Digital economy; foreign direct investment; U-shaped relationship; spatial spillover effect

CITE THIS PAPER

Liang Enshuo, Liu Xiaoqi, Spatial Effects of Digital Economy and Foreign Direct Investment—A U-shaped relationship. Information Systems and Economics (2023) Vol. 4: 30-38. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/infse.2023.040205.

REFERENCES

[1] Banalieva E. R., & Dhanaraj C. (2019). Internalization theory for the digital economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(8), 1372-1387.
[2] Barrell R., & Pain N. (1999). Domestic institutions, agglomerations and foreign direct investment in Europe. European Economic Review, 43(4-6), 925-934.
[3] Choi C. (2003). Does the Internet stimulate inward foreign direct investment? Journal of Policy Modeling, 25(4), 319-326.
[4] Choi C. (2010). The effect of the Internet on service trade. Economics Letters, 109(2), 102-104.
[5] Corcoran A., & Gillanders R. (2015). Foreign direct investment and the ease of doing business. Review of world economics, 151(1), 103-126.
[6] Desbordes R., & Wei S. J. (2017). The effects of financial development on foreign direct investment. Journal of Development Economics, 127, 153-168.
[7] Dunning J. H. (1998). Location and the multinational enterprise: a neglected factor? Journal of international business studies, 29(1), 45-66.
[8] Eden L. (2016). Multinationals and foreign investment policies in a digital world. In E15Initiative, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development and World Economic Forum, Geneva. www. e15initiative. org.
[9] Frey C. B., & Osborne M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological forecasting and social change, 114, 254-280.
[10] Goldfarb A., & Tucker C. (2019). Digital economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1), 3-43.
[11] Guo F., Wang J., Wang F., Kong, T., Zhang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Measuring China's digital financial inclusion: Index compilation and spatial characteristics. China Economic Quarterly, 19(4), 1401-1418.
[12] Halleck Vega S., & Elhorst J. P. (2015). The SLX model. Journal of Regional Science, 55(3), 339-363.
[13] Hennart J. F. (2014). The accidental internationalists: a theory of born globals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 117-135.
[14] Hui X., Saeedi M., Shen, Z., & Sundaresan N. (2016). Reputation and regulations: Evidence from eBay. Management Science, 62(12), 3604-3616.
[15] Keller W. (2002). Trade and the Transmission of Technology. Journal of Economic growth, 7(1), 5-24.
[16] Li H. Q., & Jian Z. Q. (2022). Research on the resource allocation effect of digital economy development on technology enterprises. Studies in Science of Science, 40(8), 1390-1400.
[17] Müller O., Fay M., & Vom Brocke J. (2018). The effect of big data and analytics on firm performance: An econometric analysis considering industry characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(2), 488-509.
[18] Rangan S., & Sengul M. (2009). Information technology and transnational integration: Theory and evidence on the evolution of the modern multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1496-1514.
[19] Shirazi F., Gholami R., & Higón D. A. (2010). Do foreign direct investment (FDI) and trade openness explain the disparity in ICT diffusion between Asia-Pacific and the Islamic Middle Eastern countries? Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 18(3), 59-81.
[20] Wang X., & Fan G. (2004). Analysis on the regional disparity in China and the influential factors. Economic Research Journal, 1(4), 33-44.
[21] Xiao J. H., Wu Y., Liu Y., & Xie K. (2018). New Product Development Innovation with Customer Digitalized Engagement: A Comparative Case Study from the Firm-Customer Coevolutionary Perspective. Management World, 34(8), 154-173,192.
[22] Yilmaz S., Haynes K. E., & Dinc M. (2002). Geographic and network neighbors: Spillover effects of telecommunications infrastructure. Journal of Regional Science, 42(2), 339-360.
[23] Zhan X. N., & Ouyang Y. F. (2018). New trends of global investment in the digital economy and China's new strategy for utilizing foreign investment. Management World, 34(3), 78-86.
[24] Zhao T., Zhang Z., & Liang S. K. (2020). Digital economy, entrepreneurship, and high-quality economic development: empirical evidence from urban China. Management World, 36(10), 65-76.

Downloads: 8155
Visits: 154065

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.