Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Study on the Regulation Mechanism of Organizational Quality Specific Immunie to Innovation Performance

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/ieim.2020.030207 | Downloads: 9 | Views: 798

Author(s)

Li Bing 1, Liu Qiang 1, Li Xue 1, Tang Shulin 2, Guo Yu 2

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Economics and Management, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou, Liaoning
2 School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Heilongjiang, Harbin

Corresponding Author

Li Bing

ABSTRACT

This study studies the impact of organizational quality specific immune on innovation performance, and explores whether dual learning ability, innovation atmosphere, and knowledge absorption ability have a regulatory role. Construct a theoretical model based on theoretical analysis. This study refers to the survey of relevant scholars, collects data through questionnaire surveys, and conducts empirical analysis on the survey data using bootstrap method to explore the dual learning ability, innovation atmosphere and knowledge absorption ability between organizational quality specific immune and innovation performance Mechanism. The analysis results show that: (1) dual learning ability has a moderating effect between organizational quality specific immune and innovation performance; (2) innovation atmosphere has a moderating role between organizational quality specific immune and innovation performance; (3) knowledge absorptive capacity has a moderating role between organizational quality specific immune and innovation performance.

KEYWORDS

Tissue Quality Specific Immune, Innovation Performance, Regulation

CITE THIS PAPER

Li Bing, Liu Qiang, Li Xue, Tang Shulin, Guo Yu, Study on the Regulation Mechanism of Organizational Quality Specific Immunie to Innovation Performance. Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management (2020) 3: 115-128. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/ieim.2020.030207.

REFERENCES

[1]Yang B. Y., Gao A. (2013) Research on the choice of enterprise innovation management mode and innovation performance. Scientific Research Management, 34(3), 41-49.
[2]Liu L., Li S. S., Zhang S. Q. (2017) A Review of Research on Enterprise Innovation Performance Index System. New West, (24), 64+77.
[3] Fang H., He B., Zhang Q. (2017) A review of the research on the influence mechanism of leadership on creativity and innovation performance. East China Economic Management, 31(12), 60-66.
[4] Li X. J., Zhong L., Wang J. L., Wang W.(2016) The impact of open innovation and absorptive capacity on innovation performance--Based on the empirical study of my country’s auto companies. Scientific Research Management, 36(1), 45-52.
[5] Wang G. X. (2018) Multi-dimensional proximity and relationship norms in enterprise-university-research cooperation influence mechanism on enterprise innovation performance. Management and Management, (2), 48-51.
[6] Li W. (2015) Summary and Enlightenment of the Research on the Relationship between Marketing Capability and Innovation Performance. Science and Technology Management Research, (5), 140-143.
[7] Wang M. (2015) The role of "immune system" theory in reshaping the internal audit image of enterprises. Times Finance, (9), 142.
[8] Pan X. W., Wang N. (2015) Research on the principle and path of capacity improvement of enterprise quality immune response. Journal of Chongqing Jiao tong University (Social Science Edition), 15(4), 57-60.
[9] Wang N., Li Q. X. (2015) Empirical research on the influencing factors of enterprise risk immune ability under the immune recognition mechanism. Social Science Front, (2), 267-270.
[10] March J. G. (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. 
[11] Bai .J K., Wang J. (2016) The balance effect and interaction effect of dual learning and enterprise innovation performance. Finance and Economics Research, (9), 94-100.
[12] Min H. H., Lee K. C., Lee D. S. (2015) Network structure, organizational learning culture, and employee creativity in system integration companies: The mediating effects of exploitation and exploration. Computers in Human Behaviour, 42 (1), 167-175. 
[13] Yalcinkaya G., Calantone R. J., Griffith D. A. (2013) An Examination of Exploration and Exploitation Capabilities: Implications for Product Innovation and Market Performance. Journal of International Marketing, 15(4), 63-93.
[14]Xiao Y., Xiang X. Y., Cheng L. (2019) Research on the impact of sabotage on dual learning of innovative organizations. Science Research, 37(8), 1517-1528.
[15]Jia L. Y. (2019) Research on the relationship between dynamic ability, dual learning and enterprise innovation performance. Journal of Beijing Economic Management College, 34(4), 38-45.
[16]Zhang L., Wang Y. P.(2018) Research on the relationship among employee creativity, innovation performance and innovation atmosphere based on hierarchical regression model. Journal of Harbin University of Commerce (Social Science Edition), (2), 65-73.
[17]Oldham G.R., Cummings A. (1996) Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 34-607.
[18]Tesluk P.E., Farr J. L., Klein S. R. (1997) Influences of organizational culture and atmosphere on individual creativity. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 31(1), 27-41.
[19] Fang L. T., Shi K., Liu R. H. (2012) Review on the research of team innovation atmosphere. Scientific Research Management, 33(6), 146-153.
[20] Jin S. H., Zheng J. J., Ding J. (2008) Concept, measurement and related research hotspots of organizational innovation atmosphere. Psychological Exploration, 28(3), 67-72.
[21] Zhang Y. (2014) Research field of relationship between innovation atmosphere, knowledge duality and service innovation. Zhejiang Technology and Business University.
[22] Wang Y. F., Zhu Y. (2005) Overview of foreign organizations’ innovation climate research. Foreign Economy and Management, 27(8), 26-32.
[23] Liu Y., Shi J. T., Zhang W. Q. (2009) Definition of innovation atmosphere and scale verification. Science Research, 27(2), 289-294.
[24] Chen C. (2019) Empirical research on the impact of innovation climate and knowledge absorption ability on innovation performance. Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications.
[25]Isaksen S.G., Akkermans H. J. (2011) Creative atmosphere: a leadership lever for innovation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(3), 161-187.
[26]Carmeli A., Cohen-Meitar R., Elizur D. (2007) The role of job challenge and organizational identification in enhancing creative behaviour among employees in the workplace. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 41(2), 75-90.
[27] Lian X., Yang B. Y., Ma Y.T. (2013) Research on the impact of organizational innovation atmosphere on employee innovation behaviour. Journal of Management, 10(7), 985-992.
[28] Gu Y. D., Zhou W. L., Peng J. S.(2014) Research on the impact mechanism of organizational support on the innovative behaviour of R&D personnel. Management Science, 27(1), 109-119.
[29]Cohen W. D., Levinthal A. (1990) Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35,128-152.
[30]March J. G. (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
[31]Mowery D. C., Oxley J. E., Silverman B. (1996) Strategic alliances and inter firm Knowledge transfer. Strategic management journal, 17(1), 77-91.
[32] He Y. Q., Zhang Q. P. (2012) The connotation and composition dimension of knowledge absorption capacity: based on the perspective of human body digestion and absorption. Information Theory and Practice, 35(3), 32-36.
[33] Bi Y. Q.(2016) Research on the relationship between tacit knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity and employee innovation behaviour. Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics.
[34] Qin P. F., Shen G. L., Hu W. B., Wang X. X. (2019) Research on the effect of knowledge search on innovation ability under the dual adjustment of knowledge absorption and integration ability. Journal of Management, 16(2), 219-228.
[35] Xiao Y. H., Zhu W., Sun K. (2019) Research on the construction of external knowledge search model based on innovation network. Information Theory and Practice, 42(6), 131-137.
[36] Qin J. L., Zhang Y. C. (2018) Research on the relationship between personal knowledge absorptive capacity and dual innovation. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 35(8), 128-136.
[37] Jie X. M., Zuo L. L. (2013) Enterprise collaborative innovation network characteristics and innovation performance: Research on the intermediary effect based on knowledge absorptive capacity. Nankai Management Review, 16(3), 47-56.
[38] Liu L., Yang H. X. (2018) The impact of institutional distance on the performance of Chinese listed companies’ cross-border mergers and acquisitions-the intermediary role of international experience and knowledge absorption ability. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 35(5), 113-119.
[39] Shi L. P., Liu Q., Wu K. J., Du Z. W. (2013) The mechanism of the consistency of organizational quality specific immune construction elements on quality performance: an empirical analysis based on PP method, fit method and AHP. Industrial Engineering and Management, 18(3), 84-91.
[40] Ma J. (2019) Research on the formation mechanism of quality-specific immunity in equipment manufacturing enterprises. Liaoning University of Technology.
[41] Han Y., Li D. (2015) Effects of intellectual capital on innovative performance. Management Decision, 53(1), 40-56.
[42] Wang Y. H. (2018) Research on the Influence of Organizational Cognition and Organizational Learning on Innovation Performance from a Dualistic Perspective. Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics.
[43] Su Z.F., Li J. (2014) Research on the impact of absorptive capacity on product innovation. Scientific Research Management, 35(5), 62-69.

Downloads: 1410
Visits: 63844

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.