Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Ecological Environment Management and Applicable Resource Conditions for Open-pit Mining

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/erej.2022.060502 | Downloads: 9 | Views: 456

Author(s)

Xin Zhao 1, Qiyao Guan 2, Shenjiu Zhao 3, Wuju Zheng 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Xiuyan Manchu Autonomous County Natural Resources Bureau, Anshan, Liaoning, 114300, China
2 Xiuyan Manchu Autonomous County Shunhe Mining Co., Ltd., Anshan, Liaoning, 114300, China
3 Xiuyan Manchu Autonomous County Yuyan Mine Technology Consulting Service Co., Ltd., Anshan, Liaoning, 114300, China

Corresponding Author

Xin Zhao

ABSTRACT

The development of mineral resources is the core industry of the national economy. The development, processing and use of mineral resources not only promotes social and economic development, but also brings many ecological and environmental problems. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to choose the ecological environment protection management and restoration measures through the study of the ecological environment impact assessment of mining mountains. The purpose of this paper is to study the ecological environment management and applicable resource conditions of open-pit mining mines, taking calcite as the research object, to analyze the impact of mine ecological environment protection and restoration on the mine ecological environment, and first establish the mine ecological environment protection and restoration management. Evaluation index system, using expert rating method and analytic hierarchy process to analyze the indicators. The evaluation index system of mine ecological environment protection and restoration management with 4 indicators was obtained. The hierarchical weight results show that the weight of production wastewater treatment and utilization rate is 0.3428, the weight of pollution water body treatment and restoration rate is 0.1572, the weight of damaged landscape restoration rate is 0.3148, and the weight of land reclamation rate in mining area is 0.1852, so the ecological restoration and governance status is the most important factor affecting mines. The main reasons for the status of ecological environment protection and restoration.

KEYWORDS

Open Pit Mining, Ecological Environment, Calcite Mine, Analytic Hierarchy Process

CITE THIS PAPER

Xin Zhao, Qiyao Guan, Shenjiu Zhao, Wuju Zheng, Ecological Environment Management and Applicable Resource Conditions for Open-pit Mining. Environment, Resource and Ecology Journal (2022) Vol. 6: 5-11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/erej.2022.060502.

REFERENCES

[1] Teck G. A. Perspective on Social-Ecological System Framework and New Institutional Economics Theories in Explaining Public Open Spaces (POS) Governance and Quality Issues [J]. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 2019, 19(2):1-13.
[2] Lisboa A C, Souza F, Ribeiro C M, et al. On Modelling and Simulating Open Pit Mine Through Stochastic Timed Petri Nets [J]. IEEE Access, 2019, (99):1-1.
[3] A D W, B M B, A P A G, et al. Combined optimisation of an open-pit mine outline and the transition depth to underground mining – Science Direct [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 268(2):624-634.
[4] Gholamnejad J, Azimi A, Lotfian R, et al. The application of a stockpile stochastic model into long-term open pit mine production scheduling to improve the feed grade for the processing plant [J]. Rudarsko Geolosko Naftni Zbornik, 2020, 35(4):115-129.
[5] Loring P A, Hinzman M S. "They're All Really Important, But": Unpacking How People Prioritize Values for the Marine Environment in Haida Gwaii, British Columbia [J]. Ecological Economics, 2018, 152(oct.):367-377.
[6] Ruiz-Frau A, Krause T, Marba N. In the blind-spot of governance - Stakeholder perceptions on seagrasses to guide the management of an important ecosystem services provider [J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 688(Oct.20):1081-1091.
[7] Adjei R, Addaney M, Danquah L. The ecological footprint and environmental sustainability of students of a public university in Ghana: developing ecologically sustainable practices [J]. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2021, 22(7):1552-1572.
[8] Castellanos-Navarrete A. Oil palm dispersal into protected wetlands: Human–environment dichotomies and the limits to governance in southern Mexico [J]. Land Use Policy, 2021, 103(3–4):105304.
[9] Dutra L, Sporne I, Haward M, et al. Governance mapping: A framework for assessing the adaptive capacity of marine resource governance to environmental change [J]. Marine Policy, 2019, 106(AUG.):103392.1-103392.13.
[10] Andrew, Flynn, Li, et al. The Protean Environmental State in Dongguan: Reconceptualising the local state and ecological development in China: [J]. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 2019, 38(3):443-463.
[11] Kelani G, Alimi T, Amujoyegbe B J, et al. Gender Differentials and Optimal Combination of Crop Enterprises under Limited Resource Conditions in South Western Nigeria: A Case Study of Cocoa-based Farming Systems[J]. Asian Research Journal of Agriculture, 2020, 12(2):27-38.
[12] Antonenko V, Khutkyi V. Museums as a Tourist Resource in the Conditions of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and New Opportunities [J]. Bulletin of Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts Series in Tourism, 2021, 4(1):54-73.
[13] Alidou S, Gundogdu K S, Traore F, et al. Estimating in-season actual evapotranspiration over a large-scale irrigation scheme in resource-limited conditions [J]. Comptes rendus de l'Académie bulgare des sciences: sciences mathématiques et naturelles, 2020, 73(10):1473-1480.
[14] Byelozyerova Y, Lebedeva Y. The Possibility of Using Alternative Intangible Resources to Motivate Staff in the Conditions Resource Constraints [J]. Management of the personnel and intellectual resources in Russia, 2020, 9(2):26-30.
[15] Savelieva A D, Milyaev D V, Dushenin D I. Determining the Conditions for the Resource and Economic Assets Emergence Using Threshold Analysis Algorithms[J]. World of Economics and Management, 2021, 21(1):59-71.
[16] Kuznecov S, Kaschenko M. Robotization in Modern Conditions of Human Resource Management [J]. Actual directions of scientific researches of the XXI century theory and practice, 2020, 8(2):90-94.
[17] Belan I A, Rosseeva L P, Blokhina N P, et al. Resource potential of soft spring wheat varieties for the conditions of Western Siberia and Omsk region (analytical review)[J]. Agricultural science Euro-North-East, 2021, 22(4):449-465.
[18] Kononets N, Novopismenny S. Resource-Based Learning of the Discipline "Higher School Pedagogy" in the Conditions of Distance Education [J]. Тhe Sources Of Pedagogical Skills, 2021(26):107-114.

Downloads: 3222
Visits: 175146

Sponsors, Associates, and Links


All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.