Author(s)

Jinglei Wang ¹, Xinyi Wu ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ Business College, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China

Corresponding Author

Jinglei Wang

ABSTRACT

Science city is a regional economic spatial form that combines innovative high-tech industries and basic urban functions, and is an important carrier of national strategic frontier scientific research. The construction of national science city faces complicated and changeable governance environment, and how to promote the high-quality development of science city has become an urgent problem to be solved. Based on the perspective of cooperative governance, this paper frameworks and analyzes the construction of science city from the three dimensions of governance subject, governance mode and governance content, and takes the science city of western China (Chongqing) as an example, and deeply studies the high-quality development road of science city. According to the research, the governance subject of science city mainly involves public sector, market organization and social organization, and all kinds of subjects play an important role in the construction of science city; The important contents of science city construction include optimizing business environment, constructing “technology + finance” ecosystem, and accelerating technology transformation efficiency; regional government linkage, industry-university-research cooperation and political school cooperation are the important breakthrough to alleviate and explore the governance pressure of science city governance. In order to further promote the high-quality growth of science city, it is proposed that the high-quality development of science city should be promoted from the aspects of promoting multiple subjects to participate in the construction of science city, regional linkage development, and gathering international innovation resources.

KEYWORDS

cooperative governance, science city, high-quality development, governance subject, governance content, governance mode

CITE THIS PAPER

Jinglei Wang, Xinyi Wu, Research on the Realization Path of High-quality Development of Science City from the Perspective of Cooperative Governance: Take Western China (Chongqing) Science City as an Example. Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management (2022) Vol. 5: 42-57. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/ieim.2022.051107.

REFERENCES

[1] Milward, H., Provan, K. (2000). How Networks Are Governed. HEINRICH C, LYNN L E. (Eds.) Governance and Performance: New Perspectives. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Press, 238-262.
[2] Bovaird, T. (2010). Developing new forms of partnership with the 'market' in the procurement of public services. Public Administration, 84, 81-102.
[3] Kirk, E., Tina, N., Stephen, B. (2012). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1-30.
[4] Ansell, C., Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18: 543-571.
[5] Bielefeld, W. (1994). Government and Voluntary Organizations: A Relational Perspective. Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews, 23: 585-586.
[6] Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). Government-nonprofit partnership: a defining framework. Public Administration and Development, 22, 19-30.
[7] Wang, H. (2014). The Chinese Applicability and Limitation of Cooperative Governance. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 11-20.
[8] Jing, Y. (2014). From Service Procurement to Collaborative Governance: Forms and Evolution of Government-Nonprofit Collaboration. Chinese Public Administration, 54-59. 
[9] Qin, Y., Du, D., Dai, Z. (2008). From Science Park to Science City: The evolution and function improvement of ICT industrial cluster in Sista, Sweden. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 25, 72-75.
[10] Zhu, D., Yang, C., Zhang, Z. (2020). The Organic Integration of Science and City: Case Study of Huairou Science City. Urban Development Studies, 27: 4-11.
[11] Yuan, X., Liu, H. (2013). Science city strategy in the UK and its implications for development. City planning international, 28, 58-64.
[12] Chen, W., Lin, X. (2009). Comparison and Inspiration on Innovation Model of Science and Technology Park——Based on Analysis of Silicon Valley, Hsinchu and Tsukuba. Chinese public administration, 113-115.
[13] Qiu, B., Yan, J. (2019). The Construction of Saclay Science City and Enlightenment to Domestic Megacities of Paris city's functional dispersal experiences. Urban Development Studies, 26, 37-45.
[14] Huang, Q., Cui, Z., Ye, Z. (2020). Research on the Elements Flow in Science and Technology Innovation and Interactive Development in the Program of "Three Cities and One District". Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 20: 56-64.
[15] Zeng, X., Song, Z. (2013). Science City: Forward Position of the Russian Scientific and Technological Innovation. Science and Technology Management Research, 33, 9-12.
[16] Chen, G., Xu, X., Xu, Y. (2006).The connotation of regional innovation system features and major types: literature review. Zhengjiang Social Sciences, 23-29.
[17] Zhang, L., Fu, S., Zhang, Q., Jiang, R. (2019). Analysis and Suggestions on Organizational Management Patterns of High-tech Parks Based on the Large-scale Scientific Facilities ——A Case Study of Neutron Science City. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 36, 14-23.
[18] Sun, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, M. (2020). Research on the Construction Mode of Innovation Ecosystem in Tsukuba Science City in Japan. Contemporary Economy of Japan, 39, 65-80.
[19] Ding, J. (2015). Logical construction and operation mechanism of collaborative innovation model in University of Tsukuba. Foreign education research, 42, 47-56.
[20] Zhao, B., Wang, Y. (2022). Research Progress of Governance Mechanism of Regional Cooperation in China. Reform of Economic System, 43-50.
[21] Wang, W. (2012). Governance models of local interest conflicts in regional cooperation: comparison and enlightenment. CASS Journal of Political Science, 98-107.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Information Systems and Economics
  
  
• Accounting, Auditing and Finance
  
  
• Tourism Management and Technology Economy
  
  
• Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
  
  
• Financial Engineering and Risk Management
  
  
• Accounting and Corporate Management
  
  
• Social Security and Administration Management
  
  
• Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
  
  
• Statistics & Quantitative Economics
  
  
• Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
  
  
• Social Medicine and Health Management
  
  
• Land Resource Management
  
  
• Information, Library and Archival Science
  
  
• Journal of Human Resource Development
  
  
• Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
  
  
• Operational Research and Cybernetics