Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

The Discussion of Win-win Path for Manufacturing and Financial Industry in China

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/ieim.2022.051010 | Downloads: 3 | Views: 463

Author(s)

Wei Wei 1, Xiulan Chen 1, Yun Zhang 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Finance, Shanghai Lixin Universtiy of Accounting and Finance, Pudong, Shanghai, China

Corresponding Author

Yun Zhang

ABSTRACT

Making the manufacturing industry bigger and stronger needs the support of the financial industry. Through analysis, this paper finds that China’s manufacturing industry contributes a lot to the bank, but the profit rate is generally low, and the loan from the bank also brings a low return to the bank. The cooperation between the manufacturing industry and the financial industry in China is still at a low level at present, and the commercial banks have not fully exerted their deeper professional ability. By studying some examples of the combination of industry and finance at home and abroad, this paper confirms that banks could be the capital strategy officers of manufacturing enterprises and serve the whole life cycle of enterprises, digital platform can also help manufacturing enterprises to carry out digital transformation, and other financial services industries can also do more for supporting the manufacturing industry. Government can also do something to promote the interaction between manufacturing industry and financial industry.

KEYWORDS

Manufacturing industry, financial industry, win-win Path

CITE THIS PAPER

Wei Wei, Xiulan Chen,Yun Zhang, The Discussion of Win-win Path for Manufacturing and Financial Industry in China. Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management (2022) Vol. 5: 76-85. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/ieim.2022.051010.

REFERENCES

[1] McKinsey & Company. (2019) Value Creation Ranking of China's Top 40 Banks.
[2] Yi Gang. (2020) Revisiting China’s Financial Asset Structure and Policy Implications, Policy Research of the People's Bank of China, the first issue of 2020 General Issue 1, November. 
[3] Jiang, J., Li, Z. and Lin, C. (2014) Financing Difficulties of SMEs from Its Financing Sources in China. Journal of Service Science and Management, 7, 196-200.
[4] Renate Kersten, Job Harms, Kellie Liket, Karen Maas. (2017) Small Firms, large Impact? A systematic review of the SME Finance Literature, World Development, Volume 97, Pages 330-348.
[5] Anthony Abiodun Eniola, Harry Entebang. (2015) SME Firm Performance-Financial Innovation and Challenges, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 195, Pages 334-342.
[6] Santiago Carbó-Valverde, Francisco Rodríguez-Fernández, Gregory F. Udell. (2009) Bank Market Power and SME Financing Constraints, Review of Finance, Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 309–340.
[7] Ali Mirzaei, Robert Grosse. (2019) The interaction of quantity and quality of finance: Did it make industries more resilient to the recent global financial crisis? International Review of Economics & Finance, Volume 64, Pages 493-512.
[8] Bell, David E., Ray A. Goldberg, Mary Louise Shelman, and Aldo Sesia. (2009) "Rabobank: The Global Food and Agriculture Bank." Harvard Business School Case 510-024, December. (Revised April 2010.).
[9] Frei, Frances X., and Dennis Campbell. (2001) "Pilgrim Bank (A): Customer Profitability." Harvard Business School Case 602-104, October 2001. (Revised October 2017.).
[10] Indrit Hoxha. (2013) The market structure of the banking sector and financially dependent manufacturing sectors, International Review of Economics & Finance, Volume 27, Pages 432-444.

Downloads: 11270
Visits: 270250

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.