Author(s)

Hongzhi Zhang ¹, Jianhua Gu ², Xinbin Zhao ^3,4

Affiliation(s)

¹ Zhejiang Loong Airlines Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, China
² Airlines Operation Control Center, Zhejiang Loong Airlines Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, China
³ Aviation Safety Institute, China Academy of Civil Aviation Science and Technology, Beijing, China
⁴ Engineering and Technical Research Center of Civil Aviation Safety Analysis and Prevention of Beijing, Beijing, China

Corresponding Author

Hongzhi Zhang

ABSTRACT

The ability evaluation of pilots is the basis of the three basic construction, and the quantified pilot abilities are required as basic data in various aspects such as precision training, qualification management, and safety management. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has published 9 core competencies of pilots (manual flight control capabilities, automatic flight control management capabilities, program execution capabilities, the ability to master and apply knowledge, communication skills, problem-solving and decision-making capabilities, situational awareness ability, fatigue management ability and team management ability), but ICAO did not elaborate on how to quantitatively evaluate these nine abilities, and the current industry's common practice is mainly to adopt manual evaluation methods. Subjective factors are too large to be objectively, fairly, scientifically and comprehensively conclusions.

KEYWORDS

Pilot Ability Evaluation, Flight System, Core Competence

CITE THIS PAPER

Hongzhi Zhang, Jianhua Gu, Xinbin Zhao, The Theory of Pilot Ability Evaluation from the System Perspective. Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management (2022) Vol. 5: 70-77. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/ieim.2022.050609.

REFERENCES

[1] Von Bertalanffy, "General System Theory," Tsinghua University Press, 1987.
[2] X. S. Qian, "Engineering Cybernetics," Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 2007.
[3] B. Amidan and T. Ferryman, "Atypical event and typical pattern detection within complex systems," IEEE Aerospace Conference 2005, pp. 3620-3631, 2005.
[4] Y. H. Chang. The status and perspective tool for flight safety risk [J]. Civil Aviation Journal Quarterly, 1999(1):1-24.
[5] International Civil Aviation Organization. Safety management manual (SMM)---Fourth Edition [M]. Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization, 2018, 226-231.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Information Systems and Economics
  
  
• Accounting, Auditing and Finance
  
  
• Tourism Management and Technology Economy
  
  
• Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
  
  
• Financial Engineering and Risk Management
  
  
• Accounting and Corporate Management
  
  
• Social Security and Administration Management
  
  
• Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
  
  
• Statistics & Quantitative Economics
  
  
• Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
  
  
• Social Medicine and Health Management
  
  
• Land Resource Management
  
  
• Information, Library and Archival Science
  
  
• Journal of Human Resource Development
  
  
• Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
  
  
• Operational Research and Cybernetics