Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
  4. Vol 4, Issue 5, 2022

Nature of Arbitration: Is Arbitration a Private Dispute Resolution Process?

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jsoce.2022.040517 | Downloads: 3 | Views: 555

Author(s)

Yingxue Yu 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Department of Law, Zhengzhou Business University, Henan, China

Corresponding Author

Yingxue Yu

ABSTRACT

Arbitration has the characteristic nature of autonomy and confidentiality, which embodies the characteristic of private dispute resolution. However, the enforcement of arbitration requires the assistance of legal force. The process of arbitration cannot be completed without the support of legal force. Therefore, the process of arbitration is not a completely private dispute resolution process. Based on the basic concepts of arbitration, this paper introduces the characteristics of arbitration autonomy and confidentiality. And then it introduces the situation in which arbitration is assisted by legal force, which embodies arbitration is not a completely private dispute resolution process.

KEYWORDS

Arbitration, Private Dispute Resolution, Legal Force

CITE THIS PAPER

Yingxue Yu, Nature of Arbitration: Is Arbitration a Private Dispute Resolution Process?. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology (2022) Vol. 4: 96-102. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jsoce.2022.040517.

REFERENCES

[1] Born G. International commercial arbitration [M]. 2009, 1rd edn, 129.
[2] Hunter M. Law and practice of international commercial arbitration [D]. Sweet & Maxwell, 2004.
[3] Tweeddale A. Arbitration of commercial disputes: international and English law and practice [D]. Transnat'l Law, 2005.
[4] Teitz L E. The Hague choice of court convention: Validating party autonomy and providing an alternative to arbitration [J].The American Journal of Comparative Law, 2005, 53(3):543-558.
[5] Blessing M, Mandatory rules of law versus party autonomy in international arbitration [J]. Journal of lnternational Arbitration, 1997, 14(4):23-40.
[6] Bonell M J. Soft law and party autonomy: The case of the UNIDROIT principles [J].Loy L REv, 2005, 51(2): 216-229.
[7] Engle R. Tarty autonomy in international arbitration: where uniformity gives way to predictability[D].Transnat'l Law, 2002.
[8] Chorus J. Introduction to Dutch law [M]. 2016, 1rd edn, 86.
[9] Kouris S. Confidentiality: is international arbitration losing one of its major benefits?[J]. Journal of lnternational Arbitration, 2005, 22(2):100-120.
[10] Kazutake O.Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration: Consolidation of Multiparty and Classwide Arbitration [J]. Ann Surv Inti & Comp L, 2003, 9: 189-199.
[11] Goode R.The role of the lex loci arbitri in international commercial arbitration[J]. Arbitration International, 2014, 17(1):19-40.
[12] Cole S R. Managerial Litigants-The Overlooked Problem of Party Autonomy in Dispute Resolution [J]. Hastings LJ, 1999, 51(13): 1199-1210.
[13] Schmitz A  J. Untangling the privacy paradox in arbitration [J].U Kan L Rev, 2005, 54(1): 1200-1211.
[14] Lowenfeld A F.The Party-Appointed Arbitrator in International Controversies: Some Reflections[J]. Tex. Int'I LJ, 1995, 30(2):59-80.
[15] Franchini J D .International Arbitration Under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: A Contractual Provision for Improvement[J].Fordham L Rev,1993. 62(1):2223-2245.
[16] Drahozal C R. Arbitration by the Numbers: The State of Empirical Research on International Commercial Arbitration[J].Arbitration International, 2006,22(2): 291-308.
[17] Collins M. Privacy and confidentiality in arbitration proceedings[J]. Tex Int'l LJ, 1995, 30(1):121-139.
[18] Estreich S & Enet S C, The Confidentiality of Arbitration Proceedings[J]. New York Law, 2009, 240(31): 3-29.
[19] Trakman L E. Confidentiality in international commercial arbitration[J]. Arbitration International, 2014, 18(1): 1-18.
[20] Stipanowich T J. The Arbitration Penumbra: Arbitration Law and the Rapidly Changing Landscape of Dispute Resolution[J]. Nev L J, 2007, (1): 427-456.
[21] Brown A C.Presumption meets reality: an exploration of the confidentiality obligation in international commercial arbitration[D]. Journal of lnternational Arbitration, 2000.
[22] Laeuchli U M. Civil and common law: Contrast and synthesis in international arbitration[J]. Dispute Resolution Journal, 2007, 62(3):81.
[23] Gu W. Confidentiality Revisited:Blessing or Curse in International Commercial Arbitration?[D]. Journal of International Arbitration, 2005.
[24] Ware S J. Contractural Arbitration, Mandatory Arbitration, and State Constitutional Jury-Trial Rights[D]. USFL,2003.
[25] Ware S J . Judicial Review of Errors of Law Under the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act[J]. The American Review of International Arbitration, 1999, 8(1):   23-40.
[26] Cohen J H.Law of Commercial Arbitration and the New York Statute[J].The American Review of International Arbitration,2009,31(1):130-147.
[27] Randall S. Judicial Attitudes Toward Arbitration and the Resurgence of Unconscionability[J]. Buff L Rev, 2004, 50(1) :185-190.
[28] Samuel A, 'Arbitration, Alternative Dispute Resolution Generally and the European Convention on Human Rights[J].Journal of International Arbitration, 2004, 21(5) :413-437.
[29] Zhou J. Judicial intervention in international arbitration: a comparative study of the scope of the New York Convention in US and Chinese courts[J]. Pac Rim L & Pol'y J , 2006, 15(1): 403-420.
[30] Bachand F. Court Intervention in International Arbitration: The Case for Compulsory Judicial Internationalism[J]. Disp Resol, 2012, 4(1)83-90.
[31] Gruner D M. Accounting for the Public Interest in International Arbitration: The Need for Procedural and Structural Reform[J]. Colum J Transnat'l L, 2002, 41(1) 923-950.
[32] Craver C B. The Judicial Enforcement of Public Sector Interest Arbitration[J].  BCL Rev, 1979, 21(2): 557-530.
[33] Rogers C A. Transparency in international commercial arbitration[J]. U Kan L Rev, 2005, 54(3): 1301-1330.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.