Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) in the Neoliberal Perspective of Neoliberal Institutionalism

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jsoce.2022.040515 | Downloads: 9 | Views: 646

Author(s)

Mengyan Zang 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of International Relations, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China

Corresponding Author

Mengyan Zang

ABSTRACT

On November 15, 2020, 15 countries: ASEAN, China, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, etc. formally signed the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (RCEP), marking the official launch of the world's largest free trade area. As a system of economic cooperation among East Asian countries, RCEP is in line with the "common interests" of East Asian countries' economic development, and is a mutually beneficial development model under a non-zero-sum game, and therefore conforms to the relevant norms of neoliberal institutionalism. The analysis of the development path and advantages of RCEP cooperation through the perspective of neoliberalism system will provide guidance for the continued implementation of RCEP.

KEYWORDS

RCEP, Neoliberal Institutionalism, Regional Economy

CITE THIS PAPER

Mengyan Zang, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) in the Neoliberal Perspective of Neoliberal Institutionalism. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology (2022) Vol. 4: 84-89. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jsoce.2022.040515.

REFERENCES

[1] Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (RCEP), (2020) [online] Available: http: //fta.mofcom. gov.cn/rcep/rceppdf/d20z_cn.pdf.
[2] Yanjun Wu. "Neoliberal institutionalism: a theoretical cornerstone of international institutions and international cooperation" Hubei Social Science. 06 (2005): 130-132.
[3] Lijun Wang. "A Discernment of Neoliberal Institutionalist Theories of International Cooperation." Pacific Journal 20.06 (2012): 44-50. doi:10.14015/j.cnki.1004-8049.2012.06.006.
[4] Ye Ma. "On the Relevance of International Regimes and International Cooperation under Conditions of Interdependence" China Market. 32 (2017): 100-103+119. doi:10.13939/j.cnki.zgsc.2017.32.100.
[5] Brian C. Rathbun."It takes all types: social psychology, trust, and the international relations paradigm in our minds." International Theory 1.3 (2009). doi: 10.1017/S1752971909990121.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.