Ethnography of Communication Analysis of Ph.d Students’ on-Line Group Discussion
DOI: 10.23977/jsoce.2022.040122 | Downloads: 16 | Views: 976
Author(s)
Qin Yang 1,2
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Foreign Languages, West Anhui University, Lu’an, China
2 College of Liberal Arts and Communication, De La Salle University - Dasmariñas, Cavite, the Philippines
Corresponding Author
Qin YangABSTRACT
On the basis of Hymes’ theory of SPEAKING model, the paper researches into the speaking model of Chinese Ph.D student’s on-line group study under the Philippines’ university. The paper aims to seek out the features of Chinese Ph.D students’ on-line peer group discussion on paper writing from the perspective of ethnography of communication.
KEYWORDS
Hymes, Speaking model, Ph, D students, On-line peer group discussionCITE THIS PAPER
Qin Yang, Ethnography of Communication Analysis of Ph.d Students’ on-Line Group Discussion. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology (2022) Vol. 4: 108-113. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jsoce.2022.040122.
REFERENCES
[1] Cots, J.M. “Norms of Interaction and Interpretation: An Ethnographic Approach to Discourse in a Catalan University Context”. Sintagma,no.4, pp. 61-67, 1992.
[2] Carbaugh, D.Talking American: Cultural Discourses on DONAHU. Amsterdam:Ablex Publishing Corporation,1989.
[3] Duff, P.A. “An Ethnography of Communication in Immersion Classroom in Hungary”. TESOL Quarterly, vol.29, no.3,pp. 505-537,1995.
[4] Dundes, A., Leach, J. W. , & Ozkok, B. “‘The Strategy of Turkish Boys’ Verbal Dueling Rhymes’”, in J. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes ( eds) Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. Holt Rinehart & Winston. pp. 130-160, 1972.
[5] Hymes, D. “Introduction: Toward Ethnographies of Communication”. American Anthropologist, vol.66, no. 2, pp. 1–34, 1964.
[6] Horning, A.S. “D’var torah: Tools for Understanding the Impact of a Sermon”. Michigan Academician, no. 40, pp.1-20, 2010
[7] Hymes, D. ‘Models of the interaction of language and social life’, in J. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes ( eds) Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston. pp. 35-71, 1972.
[8] Hymes, D.Foundation in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1974.
[9] Kothari, C.R.Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. Lincolnshire: New Age International Limited, 2010.
[10] Paltridge, B.Making Sense of Discourse Analysis. Moorooka: Merino Lithographics, 2000.
[11] Ray, M.& Biswas, C. “A Study on Ethnography of Communication: A Discourse Analysis with Hymes 'Speaking Model’”. Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 2, no. 6, pp.33-40, 2011.
[12] Saville-Troike, M. S.The Ethnography of Communication(3rd.ed). Hoboken: Basil Blackwell, 2003.
[13] Spolsky, B. Sociolinguistics (1st ed.). Qxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Downloads: | 23397 |
---|---|
Visits: | 610723 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
-
Information and Knowledge Management
-
Military and Armament Science
-
Media and Communication Research
-
Journal of Human Movement Science
-
Art and Performance Letters
-
Lecture Notes on History
-
Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
-
Philosophy Journal
-
Science of Law Journal
-
Journal of Political Science Research
-
Advances in Broadcasting