Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

An Extended Zone of Tolerance Method to Measure Service Quality

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jsoce.2022.040118 | Downloads: 10 | Views: 735

Author(s)

Jih-Kuang Chen 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Economics & Management College, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, 526061, China

Corresponding Author

Jih-Kuang Chen

ABSTRACT

SERVQUAL has been widely applied in the domain of service quality measurement, but there have also been some arguments raised. However, an issue is less proposed to discuss, that is, the gap score only calculated by central tendency, i.e. mean, but variation tendency is not involved, i.e. standard deviation. Such variation concepts have been applied widely to the quality management of manufactory industries, and demonstrate fully its’ essentiality and effectiveness. Hence, this paper proposes an extended ZOT analysis method, it involve the variation tendency into SERVQUAL to measure service quality, and via the integrate with the concept of Zone of Tolerance, then adopt process capability index to replace the traditional ZOT analysis which is mean based, therefore increase the measuring precision. Furthermore, through a case study to compare the traditional ZOT analysis with the Extended ZOT analysis, thus demonstrate its’ validity.

KEYWORDS

Servqual, Zone of tolerance, Service quality

CITE THIS PAPER

Jih-Kuang Chen, An Extended Zone of Tolerance Method to Measure Service Quality. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology (2022) Vol. 4: 86-93. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jsoce.2022.040118.

REFERENCES

[1] A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml and L. L. Berry (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, vol.64, no.1, p.14-40.
[2] A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml and L. L. Berry (1991a). Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale. Journal of Retailing, vol.67, p.420-450.
[3] A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml and L. L. Berry (1991b). Understanding customer expectation of service. Sloan Management Review, Spring, p.39-48.
[4] A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml and L. L. Berry (1993). The Nature and Determinants of Customer Expectations of Service. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Service, vol.21, no.1, p.1-12.
[5] R. K. Teas and T. E. DeCarlo (2004). An Examination and Extension of the Zone-of-Tolerance Model-- A Comparison to Performance-Based Models of Perceived Quality. Journal of Service Research,vol.6, no.3, p.272-286.
[6] K. B. Yap, and J. C. Sweeney (2007). Zone‐of‐tolerance moderates the service quality‐outcome relationship. Journal of Services Marketing, vol.21, no.2, p. 137-148.
[7] W. W. Li and Y. W. Chung (2012). Satisfaction and zone of tolerance: The moderating roles of elaboration and loyalty programs. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, vol.22, no.1, p.38-57.
[8] L. J. M. Coulthard (2004). Measuring service quality: A review and critique of research using SERVQUAL. International Journal of Market Research, vol.46, p.479-497.
[9] C. Fornell (1992). A national customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience. Journal of Marketing, vol.56, p.6-21.
[10] A. Parasuraman and L. L. Berry (1997). Listening to the Customer-The Concept of a Service-Quality Information System. Sloan Management Review, Spring, p.65-76.
[11] H. C. Charbonneau and G. L. Webster (1978). Industrial Quality Control. Prentice Hall, Engle wood Cliffs, New Jersey.
[12] V. E. Kane (1986). Process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology, vol.18, no.1, p.41-52.
[13] L. K. Chan, S. W. Cheng, and F. A. Spiring (1988). A new measure of process capability Cpm. Journal of Quality Technology, vol.20, no.3, p.162-175.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.