Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

A Statistical and Pragmatic Analysis on Questioning in Chinese TV Interview Programs

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/artpl.2019.11003 | Downloads: 2 | Views: 37

Author(s)

Weihong Chen 1, Jianming Liu 2,3

Affiliation(s)

1 College of Foreign Languages, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, P. R. China
2 College of Mathematics and Computer Science, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, P. R. China
3 Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Data Intensive Computing, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, P. R. China

Corresponding Author

Jianming Liu

ABSTRACT

Pragmatically, questioning is a special kind of speech act and language use, which can fulfill many pragmatic functions. The host’s every questioning utterance in TV interview programs means to perform some actions; thus it has been a fascinating research theme across many linguistic disciplines. The study applies SPSS 20.0 to conduct a statistical analysis on questioning’s syntactical formulation and its functions involved in TV interview programs in details. Based on collected data from three famous TV interview programs in China and with the help of SPSS 20.0, descriptive analysis and crosstabs analysis are implemented and relevant statistical results are then generated in terms of Stacked Bar Charts and Drop Line Charts. The statistical findings show that wh-questions and yes/no questions are the two predominant syntactical forms of questioning applied by hosts in these three TV interview programs and that the hosts’ questioning is designed mainly to realize these four pragmatic functions: topic and turn managing, information seeking and checking, positioning taking and sympathy arousing. Based on naturally occurring data from institutional talk, this quantitative study can thus serve as a point of departure and guideline for future questioning research in the flourishing multi-media era.

KEYWORDS

Questioning’s Syntactical Formulation, Questioning Functions, Statistical Analysis

CITE THIS PAPER

Weihong Chen, Jianming Liu, A Statistical and Pragmatic Analysis on Questioning in Chinese TV Interview Programs, Art and Performance Letters (2019) 1: 10-31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/artpl.2019.11003.

REFERENCES

[1]Naiman, N., Angie T., Maria F., & Stern, H.H. (1978) The good language learner (research in education series No. 7). Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
[2]Quirk, R. (1972) A grammar of contemporary English. New York: Longman Group.
[3]Ilie, C. (2015) Questions and questioning. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, 1-15.
[4]Bull, P., Elliott, J., Palmer, D., & Walker, L. (1996) Why politicians are three-Faced: the face model
of political interviews. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(2), 267-284.
[5]Jucker, A. H. (1986) News interviews:A pragmalinguistic analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
[6]McHoul, A. W. (1987) Why there are no guarantees for interrogators. Journal of Pragmatics, 11(4), 455-471.
[7]Ilie, C. (1994) What else can I tell tou? A pragmatic study of English rhetorical questions as discursive and argumentative Acts. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
[8]Freed, A. F. (1994) The form and function of questions in informal dyadic conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(6), 621-644.
[9]Levinson, S.C., (2012) Interrogative intimations: on a possible social economics of interrogatives. In: De Ruiter, J.P. (Ed.), Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 11-32.
[10]Modern complex sentence research. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
[11]Jingmin, Sh. (2013) The conversion relationship between the structure types of interrogative sentences and rhetorical questions. Chinese Language Learning, 2, 3-10.
[12]Anyuan, L. (1996) Modern Chinese grammar. Beijing: Press of Minzu University of China. 
[13]Leon, J. (2004) Preference and “bias” in the format of French news interviews: The semantic analysis of question-answer pairs in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(10), 1885-1920.
[14]Guodong, Y., & Hongyan, L. (2018) A conversational analysis of preference for “X” in selective question “X or (Y)”. Journal of Foreign Languages, 41(1), 49-59.
[15]Yongsheng, Sh. (2004) Basic acts analysis of host discourse of the TV talk show program. Journal of Jinan University, 26(4), 92-97.
[16]Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D. (2008) “Did you have permission to smash your neighbour’s door?” Silly questions and their answers in police—suspect interrogations. Discourse Studies, 10(1), 89-111.
[17]Graesser, A. C., Person, N., & Huber, J. (1992) Mechanisms that generate questions. Questions and information systems, 2, 167-187.
[18]Gang, H. (1995) On cultural functions of pragmatic questions. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2, 11-16.
[19]Gang, H. (1997) Pragmatic definition of questioning. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 6, 22-26. 
[20]Shenghuan, X. (1998) On the pragmatic transmutation of English interrogatives. Foreign Languages Teaching and Research, 4, 27-35. 
[21]Ilie, C. (1999) Question-response argumentation in talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(8), 975-999.
[22] Dan, L. (2007) The language appropriateness of Chinese TV talk show hosts: a pragmatic perspective. Master Dissertation. Guangxi Normal University.
[23] Kearsley, G. P. (1976) Questions and question asking in verbal discourse:A cross-disciplinary review. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 5(4), 355-375.
[24] Mey, J. L. (2001) Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
[25] Gruber, H. (2001) Questions and strategic orientation in verbal conflict sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(12), 1815-1857.
[26] Churchill, L. (1978) Questioning strategies in sociolinguistics. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
[27] Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2002) The news interview: journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[28] Hamdani, F., & Barnes, S. (2018) Polar questions in Colloquial Indonesian: A pilot study. Journal of Pragmatics, 132, 1-20.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.