Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

A Critical Appraisal of Sure Start Evaluations

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/avte.2021.030313 | Downloads: 8 | Views: 769

Author(s)

LIU Hai 1, He Ye 1, Li Min 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Overseas Education College, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610106, China

Corresponding Author

LIU Hai

ABSTRACT

This essay has critically appraised policy evaluation in Sure Start initiative in the UK. Sure Start Local Programmes (SSLPs), initiated by UK Government, aimed at addressing child poverty and social exclusion. The impetus for the implementation of Sure Start was built on the previous research, particularly evidence from the American early intervention programmes. This study focused on one of the evidence, a longitudinal study on parent involvement. By examining the design and rigour of the study, it is concluded that the use of one-group pre-test and post-test design cannot address the effectiveness of the intervention.

KEYWORDS

Sure start, Policy evaluation, Early intervention programmers

CITE THIS PAPER

LIU Hai, He Ye, Li Min, A Critical Appraisal of Sure Start Evaluations. Advances in Vocational and Technical Education (2021) Vol. 3: 56-61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/avte.2021.030313.

REFERENCES

[1] Belsky, J., Mulhuish, E., Barnes, J., Leyland, A. H., & Romaniuk, H. (2006). Effects of Sure Start local programmes on children and families: early findings from a quasi-experimental, cross sectional study. BMJ, 332(7556): pp.1476-1478.
[2] Bogdan, R.C. & Biclen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Allyn & Bacon.
[3] Broidy, L.M., Tremblay, R. E., Brame, B., Fergusson, D., Horwood, J. L., Laird, R., … & Vitaro, F. (2003). Developmental trajectories of childhood disruptive behaviors and adolescent delinquency: A six-site, cross-national study. Developmental psychology, 39(2): p.222.
[4] Clarke, K. (2006). Childhood, parenting and early intervention: A critical examination of the Sure Start national programme. Critical Social Policy, 26(4): pp.699-721.
[5] Davies, J. (2007). Is Sure Start an Effective Preventive Intervention?. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 12(1): pp.55-55.
[6] De Vaus, D. (2001). Research design in social research. SAGE Publications Limited.
[7] Eisenstadt, N. (2002). Sure Start: key principles and ethos. Child: Care, Health and Development, 28(1): p.3-4.
[8] Glass, N. (1999). Sure Start: the development of an early intervention programme for young children in the United Kingdom. Children & Society, 13(4): pp.257-264.
[9] Hutchings, J., Gardner, F., & Lane, E. (2004). Making evidence-based interventions work. Support from the start: Working with young children and their families to reduce the risks of crime and anti-social behaviour, pp.69-79.
[10] Hutchings, J., Bywater, T., Daley, D., Gardner, F., Whitaker, C., Jones, K., ... & Edwards, R. T. (2007). Parenting intervention in Sure Start services for children at risk of developing conduct disorder: pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 334(7595):p. 678
[11] Hollis, S., & Campbell, F. (1999). What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 319 (7211): pp.670-674.
[12] Melhuish, E., Belsky, J. & Barnes, J. (2010). Evaluation and value of Sure Start. Archives of disease in childhood, 95(3): pp.159-161.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.