Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

The Game between Shamanism and Sakya School: the Cultural Identity Significance of “Liangzhou Alliance” to Han, Tibetan and Mongolian Nationalities

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jsoce.2021.030604 | Downloads: 15 | Views: 850

Author(s)

Wang Xiaoting 1, Li Yang 1, Zhao Jiangxin 1, Li Zhongjie 2, Tenzin Jorden 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Humilities, Tibet University, Lhasa, 850000, China
2 School of Economics and Management, Tibet University, Lhasa, 850000, China

Corresponding Author

Wang Xiaoting

ABSTRACT

In the post-Genghis Khan era, the main way to maintain the regime of The Yuan Dynasty was no longer military conquest. With the increasingly close ethnic integration, the Yuan Empire was in urgent need of a religion that could be generally accepted by the people to promote cultural identity and maintain the unity of the multi-ethnic country. In 1247, the “Liangzhou Alliance” between Broadan, the third son of Ogodei, emperor Taizong of Yuan Dynasty, and Sakya Pandita, the religious leader of the later Tibetan region of Tibet, was not only a symbolic event that Tibet was incorporated into The territory of China, but also the beginning of the introduction of Tibetan Buddhism from The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau to the Mongolian Plateau through Liangzhou. This change is essentially the result of the game between Shamanism and Sakya. It is helpful to explore the cultural identity significance of “Liangzhou Alliance” to the Han, Tibetan and Mongolian nationalities by investigating the transformation process of the rulers' belief from Shamanism to Tibetan Buddhism (Sakya school) in the Yuan Dynasty.

KEYWORDS

Shamanism, Sakya, Gotan, Liangzhou union, The post-genghis khan era

CITE THIS PAPER

Wang Xiaoting, Li Yang, Zhao Jiangxin, Li Zhongjie, Tenzin Jorden. The Game between Shamanism and Sakya School: the Cultural Identity Significance of “Liangzhou Alliance” to Han, Tibetan and Mongolian Nationalities. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology (2021) Vol. 3: 17-23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jsoce.2021.030604.

REFERENCES

[1] Ge Menghe. Introduction to Mongolian Culture [M]. Shenyang: Liaoning Nationalities Publishing House, 2016: 412.
[2] Chen Yuning. I and Ordos Studies [M]. Yinchuan: Ningxia People's Publishing House, 2009: 98.
[3] Xu Zhaoshou, Gong Zhou. Pentium River [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2017: 103.
[4] Tuguan•Losang Chojj Nyima. Origin of Tuguan Sect [M]. Lhasa: Tibet People’s Publishing House, 1985: 98.
[5] Ngawang Gongga Suonan. Sakya Lineage History [M]. Beijing: China Tibetology Publishing House, 2005: 67-68.
[6] Fan Baoliang, Shui Changtian. Kuo Duan and Saban [M]. Lanzhou: Gansu People's Publishing House, 1997: 67.
[7] Cai Rang. A brief account of Saban’s deeds in promoting Dharma in Liangzhou and other places [J]. Tibet Studies, 2004(04): 86-90.
[8] Peng Kehong. Social Science Dictionary [M]. Beijing: China International Broadcasting Press, 1989: 265.
[9] Zhang Yahui. Temples and courts: A historical anthropological study of the 6th Panchen Lama's pilgrimage in 1780[M]. Beijing: China Tibetology Publishing House, 2016: 49-55.
[10] Shu Erlin. The faith of emperors tells the process of ruling the country by faith of emperors in the past dynasties [M]. Beijing: Beijing Yanshan Publishing House, 2013: 206-207.
[11] Chen Nan, Ren Xiaobo. Outline of Tibetan History[M]. Beijing: Central University for Nationalities Press, 2014: 81.
[12] Xiao Dongfa, Xie Denghua. Light of Faith, Natural Totem, History and Culture of Shamanism [M]. Changchun: Northern Women and Children's Publishing House, 2015: 106.
[13] Su Faxiang. The Complete Book of the Chinese Ethnic Groups Tibetans in China[M]. Yinchuan: Ningxia People's Publishing House, 2012:189.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.