Research on Income Inequality Measurement and Influencing Factor Identification among Flexible Workers Based on Interpretable Machine Learning
DOI: 10.23977/pree.2026.070101 | Downloads: 0 | Views: 45
Author(s)
Sinan Jin 1
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Labor Economics, China University of Labor Relations, Beijing, China
Corresponding Author
Sinan JinABSTRACT
With the rapid development of the digital economy and platform economy, flexible employment has become an important form of employment in the labor market. However, problems such as widening income disparities, insufficient income stability, and inadequate social security coverage are gradually becoming prominent. Addressing the shortcomings of traditional statistical analysis methods in characterizing the nonlinear relationships and interactions of income-influencing factors, this paper proposes a method for measuring income inequality and identifying influencing factors among flexible workers based on the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). First, the Gini coefficient, Theil index, and Lorenz curve are used to measure and visualize the income distribution of flexible workers to characterize the degree of income inequality within the sample. Second, XGBoost is constructed to predict the income level of flexible workers and compared with other models. Finally, the Shapley Additive Explanation method is used to interpret the prediction results of the Extreme Gradient Boosting model, identifying the contribution and direction of different variables to income disparities. This study provides a computational analysis method that combines predictive and explanatory power for measuring income inequality among flexible workers, identifying low-income risks, and analyzing factors influencing income.
KEYWORDS
Flexible employment; Income inequality; Identification of influencing factors; Income forecasting; Interpretable analysisCITE THIS PAPER
Sinan Jin. Research on Income Inequality Measurement and Influencing Factor Identification among Flexible Workers Based on Interpretable Machine Learning. Population, Resources & Environmental Economics (2026). Vol. 7, No. 1, 1-12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/pree.2026.070101.
REFERENCES
[1] Altenried M. Mobile workers, contingent labour: Migration, the gig economy and the multiplication of labour[J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2024, 56(4): 1113-1128.
[2] Himani Srihita R. Transformative dynamics of the gig economy: Technological impacts, worker well-being and global research trends[J]. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 2025, 17: 18479790241310362.
[3] Andabayeva G. Labor market dynamics in developing countries: analysis of employment transformation at the macro-level[J]. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2024, 13(1): 65.
[4] Sankararaman G. Gig economy's impact on workforce dynamics and economic resilience[J]. Available at SSRN 5086559, 2024.
[5] Tariq M U. Balancing flexibility and precarity: Ethical implications and sustainable practices in global gig economies[M]//Sustainability and Adaptability of Gig Economies in Global Business. IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025: 323-346.
[6] Au-Yeung T C. The gig economy, platform work, and social policy: food delivery workers' occupational welfare dilemma in Hong Kong[J]. Journal of Social Policy, 2025, 54(2): 673-691.
[7] Alauddin F D A. The influence of digital platforms on gig workers: A systematic literature review[J]. Heliyon, 2025, 11(1).
[8] Griep Y. Sustainable human resource management: The good, the bad, and making it work[J]. Organizational Dynamics, 2025, 54(2): 101112.
[9] Daud S N M. Adapting to the gig economy: Determinants of financial resilience among "Giggers"[J]. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2024, 81: 756-771.
[10] Chrisendo D. Rising income inequality across half of global population and socioecological implications[J]. Nature sustainability, 2025: 1-13.
[11] Karimi A, Lucke C, Palme M. Components of the evolution of income inequality in Sweden, 1990–2021[J]. Fiscal studies, 2024, 45(2): 187-204.
[12] Colak Z. Hybrid machine learning approach in forecasting renewable energy production: Extra trees, catBoost and LightGBM based stacking model[J]. Renewable Energy, 2026, 260: 125167.
[13] LI Y. Application of the adaptive sparrow search algorithm in medical supply engineering[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15: 35775. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-11793-2.
[14] FU Z. How compound climate shocks reshape urban resilience and scenario-adaptive pathways: New insights from the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2026, 121: 108563. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108563.
[15] CHEUNG Y, GUO Z, LI Y. Foliated generative adversarial networks for rolling bearings fault diagnosis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2026, 75: 1-24. DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2026.3684644
| Downloads: | 3709 |
|---|---|
| Visits: | 206387 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Information Systems and Economics
-
Accounting, Auditing and Finance
-
Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management
-
Tourism Management and Technology Economy
-
Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
-
Financial Engineering and Risk Management
-
Accounting and Corporate Management
-
Social Security and Administration Management
-
Statistics & Quantitative Economics
-
Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
-
Social Medicine and Health Management
-
Land Resource Management
-
Information, Library and Archival Science
-
Journal of Human Resource Development
-
Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
-
Operational Research and Cybernetics

Download as PDF