Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. MEDS Clinical Medicine
  4. Vol 5, Issue 3, 2024

Different surgical treatment modalities for single-compartment knee osteoarthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/medsc.2024.050316 | Downloads: 2 | Views: 77

Author(s)

Hua Li 1, Mingwan Ge 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Department of Orthopedics, Tongcheng County Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Tongcheng, Hubei, China

Corresponding Author

Mingwan Ge

ABSTRACT

The surgical treatment of single-compartment knee osteoarthritis remains controversial, so we used a network meta-analysis based on Bayesian theory for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA), and high tibia osteotomy (HTO) was evaluated for the efficacy of these three surgical techniques in the treatment of single-compartment knee osteoarthritis.The method we used was a computerized search of the Pubmed, CNKI, The Cochrane Library databases. Retrieval of randomized controlled trials of TKA, UKA, and HTO for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. Two independent authors were used for data extraction and literature quality evaluation, and the Knee Society Score (KSS), KSS(functional), revision rate, and complication rate were used as evaluation indicators. Stata, Revman, JAGS, and the gemtc package, which is based on R, were all used to carry out the Bayesian network meta-analysis. After screening, a total of 1438 patients from nine andomized controled trials were included in the analysis. The literature was retrieved from 2158 papers. The SUCRA value of KSS from high to low was: HTO, TKA, UKA, the SUCRA value of KSS (functional) from high to low was: HTO, UKA, TKA, the SUCRA value of the revision rate from low to high: HTO, UKA, TKA, and the SUCRA value of the complication rate from low to high was: HTO, TKA, UKA. Between the three surgical approaches, there were no significant differences in postoperative KSS, KSS (functional), revision rates, or complication rates. 

KEYWORDS

Single compartment knee osteoarthritis, high tibial osteotomy, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, network meta-analysis

CITE THIS PAPER

Hua Li, Mingwan Ge, Different surgical treatment modalities for single-compartment knee osteoarthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. MEDS Clinical Medicine (2024) Vol. 5: 102-109. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/medsc.2024.050316.

REFERENCES

[1] Nelson A E. Osteoarthritis year in review 2017: clinical [J]. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2018, 26(3): 319-325.
[2] Alliston T, Hernandez C J, Findlay D M, et al. Bone marrow lesions in osteoarthritis: What lies beneath [J]. J Orthop Res, 2018, 36(7): 1818-1825.
[3] Ledingham J, Regan M, Jones A, et al. Radiographic patterns and associations of osteoarthritis of the knee in patients referred to hospital [J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 1993, 52(7): 520-526.
[4] Senn S, Gavini F, Magrez D, et al. Issues in performing a network meta-analysis [J]. Stat Methods Med Res, 2013, 22(2): 169-189.
[5] Higgins J P, Altman D G, Gøtzsche P C, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials [J]. Bmj, 2011, 343(d5928.
[6] Wu L P, Mayr H O, Zhang X, et al. Knee Scores of Patients with Non-Lateral Compartmental Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Mobile, Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee and Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Orthop Surg, 2022, 14(1): 73-87.
[7] Sershon R A, Fricka K B, Hamilton W G, et al. Early Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Partial Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2022, 37(6s): S94-s97.
[8] Knifsund J, Niinimaki T, Nurmi H, et al. Functional results of total-knee arthroplasty versus medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: two-year results of a randomised, assessor-blinded multicentre trial [J]. BMJ Open, 2021, 11(6): e046731.
[9] Beard D J, Davies L J, Cook J A, et al. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet, 2019, 394(10200): 746-756.
[10] Kulshrestha V, Datta B, Kumar S, et al. Outcome of Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty vs Total Knee Arthroplasty for Early Medial Compartment Arthritis: A Randomized Study [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(5): 1460-1469.
[11] Peng Song, Xu Boyong, Cao Li. Comparison of knee scores in patients with monocondylar replacement versus total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Chinese Tissue Engineering Research, 2015, 19(48): 7724-7730.
[12] Sun P F, Jia Y H. Mobile bearing UKA compared to fixed bearing TKA: a randomized prospective study [J]. Knee, 2012, 19(2): 103-106.
[13] Newman J, Pydisetty R V, Ackroyd C. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2009, 91(1): 52-57.
[14] Stukenborg-Colsman C, Wirth C J, Lazovic D, et al. High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental joint replacement in unicompartmental knee joint osteoarthritis: 7-10-year follow-up prospective randomised study [J]. Knee, 2001, 8(3): 187-194.
[15] Chalmers B P, Mehrotra K G, Sierra R J, et al. Reliable outcomes and survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for isolated compartment osteonecrosis [J]. Bone Joint J, 2018, 100-b(4): 450-454.
[16] Migliorini F, Tingart M, Niewiera M, et al. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis [J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2019, 29(4): 947-955.
[17] Santoso M B, Wu L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, is it superior to high tibial osteotomy in treating unicompartmental osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis and systemic review [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2017, 12(1): 50.
[18] Fu D, Li G, Chen K, et al. Comparison of high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(5): 759-765.

Subscription
E-Mail Alert
Most popular papers
Call for Special Issue
Publication Ethics & OA Statement
Plagiarism Policy
Contact Us
Downloads: 5195
Visits: 242637

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.