Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Protocol for a Systematic Literature Review on the Impact of Neighborhoods on Educational Outcomes

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jsoce.2024.060310 | Downloads: 7 | Views: 141

Author(s)

Olga Giovani 1, Konstantinos Petrogiannis 2

Affiliation(s)

1 Hellenic Open University, Patra, Greece
2 University of West Attica, Attica, Greece

Corresponding Author

Olga Giovani

ABSTRACT

In the last three decades, there has been growing interest in understanding how neighborhoods influence residents' life prospects, extending beyond their individual traits. Various outcomes such as educational achievement, dropout rates, social exclusion, health, and behavioral issues have been explored through systematic literature reviews. However, establishing a direct cause-and-effect relationship between neighborhoods and these outcomes has proven challenging, given that most studies are correlational and lack robust causal evidence. This paper aims to outline the protocol and theoretical framework for a systematic literature review (SLR) to be conducted on Scopus in June 2024, focusing on synthesizing recent literature (2012 to present) on neighborhood-related factors and their impact on educational outcomes. Each article's sample size, age distribution, gender composition, context, methodology, and treatment of the "neighborhood" construct will be recorded. The SLR intends to integrate evidence from various studies to assess the level of causality reported, offering insights for reinterpretation and theoretical evaluation. The proposed SLR will be used as a means of linking studies' evidence that examine neighbourhood effects on educational outcomes. The results of this procedure will be (re)considered for reinterpretation and interconnection purposes in order to theoretically evaluate the degree of causality these studies report.

KEYWORDS

Achievement, attainment, community, neighbourhood, education

CITE THIS PAPER

Olga Giovani, Konstantinos Petrogiannis, Protocol for a Systematic Literature Review on the Impact of Neighborhoods on Educational Outcomes. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology (2024) Vol. 6: 64-69. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jsoce.2024.060310.

REFERENCES

[1] Galster, G. (2008). Quantifying the effects of neighbourhoods on individuals: Challenges, alternative approaches, and promising directions. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 128, 7–48.
[2] Galster, G. C. (2012). The mechanism(s) of neighbourhood effects: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. In M. Van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives (pp. 23–56). Dordrecht: Springer.
[3] Galster, G. (2014). Nonlinear and threshold aspects of neighborhood effects. Kolner Zeitschrift fu¨r Soziologie und Socialpsychologie, 66(1), 117–133.
[4] Galster, G., Andersson, R., & Musterd, S. (2010). Who is affected by the neighborhood income mix? Gender, age, family, employment and income differences. Urban Studies, 47(14), 2915–2944.
[5] Galster, G. C., & Santiago, A. M. (2006). What’s the ‘hood got to do with it? Parental perceptions about how neighborhood mechanisms affect their children. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(3), 201–226.
[6] van Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L., & Maclennan, D. (2012). New perspectives. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives (pp. 1–22). Dordrecht: Springer.
[7] van Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L., & Maclennan, D. (2013). Understanding neighbourhood dynamics. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Understanding neighbourhood dynamics: New insights for neighbourhood effects research (pp. 1–21). Dordrecht: Springer.
[8] Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371–399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233
[9] Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 309–337.
[10] Nieuwenhuis, J., Hooimeijer, P. (2015). The association between neighbourhoods and educational achievement, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31(2), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-015-9460-7
[11] Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Perceived Social Cohesion Scale. PsycTESTS Dataset. doi:10.1037/t14436-000
[12] Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Residents' Perception of Social Cohesion and Trust in Their Neighborhood Measure. PsycTESTS Dataset. doi:10.1037/t60403-000
[13] Sampson, R. J. (2002). Organized for what? Recasting theories of social (dis)organization. In E. Waring & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and social organization: Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 10, pp. 95-110). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
[14] Manski, C. F. (1995). Identification problems in the social sciences. Harvard University Press.
[15] Ellen, I. G., & Turner, M. A. (1997). Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), 833–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.1997.9521280
[16] Petrogiannis, K. (2003). The Study of Human Development: The Ecosystemic Approach. Presentation of the theory of Urie Bronfenbrenner based on findings from the international research. Athens: Kastaniotis.
[17] Barnes, J. (2007). How Sure Start Local Programme areas changed. The National Evaluation of Sure StartDoes Area-based Early Intervention Work?, 173-194. doi:10.1332/policypress/9781861349507.003.0010
[18] Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. E. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighbourhood. In L. E. Lynn & M. G. H. McGeary (Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[19] Horsley, T., Dingwall, O., & Sampson, M. (2011). Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011(8), MR000026. https://doi. org/10.1002/14651858. MR000026. pub2
[20] Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
[21] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
[22] Sirriyeh, R., Lawton, R., Gardner, P., & Armitage, G. (2011). Reviewing studies with diverse designs: The development and evaluation of a new tool. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(4), 746–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01662.x

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.