Author(s)

Xiakun Lin ¹, Amwayi Francis Ennocent ¹, Mukhwana Hamisi Ouma ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

Corresponding Author

Xiakun Lin

ABSTRACT

Robot engineering education plays an important role in shaping the future of automation and robotics. Among the core subjects, control systems and drive technologies stand as fundamental pillars, demanding innovative teaching methodologies to ensure comprehensive learning outcomes. This paper investigates the efficacy of interdisciplinary approach in enhancing student understanding and practical application of control and drive concepts in robot engineering courses. It highlights the implementation methods such as integrated projects and laboratory sessions, as well as other techniques including project-based learning. Through a comparative analysis of these methods, key factors influencing student engagement, knowledge retention, and skill development can be identified. This paper also explores the benefits and the real-world application of this method of teaching, highlighting its potential to revolutionize the teaching of control and drive courses. By synthesizing insights from existing literature and empirical studies, this research offers a valuable recommendation for educators seeking to optimize teaching strategies in robot engineering education.

KEYWORDS

Robot engineering; Interdisciplinary approach; Integrated projects

CITE THIS PAPER

Xiakun Lin, Amwayi Francis Ennocent, Mukhwana Hamisi Ouma, Interdisciplinary project-integrated teaching method in control and drive courses for robotics engineering oriented students. Advances in Vocational and Technical Education (2024) Vol. 6: 94-100. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/avte.2024.060314.

REFERENCES

[1] J. M. Xu, Y. Ding and X. Y. Yu, Direct teaching system of industrial robot based on compliance tracking control, High Technology Newsletter, 2015, 25(5):500-507.
[2] Johnson, G. M. Instructionism and constructivism: Reconciling two very good ideas. International Journal of Special Education, 2009, 24(3):90–98. 
[3] Y. Y. Dong, W. H. Li and H. Yu, Hierarchical relation mining of Chinese text based on mixed cosine similarity, Application Research of Computers, 2017, 34(5):1406-1409. 
[4] Gennert, M. A., & Tryggvason, G. Robotics engineering: A discipline whose time has come [education]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2009, 16(2):18–20. 
[5] N. M. Fonseca Ferreira and E. D. C. Freitas, Computer applications for education on industrial robotic systems, Comput. Appl. Engineering Educ. 2018, 26(5):1186–1194. 
[6] A.R.J. Almusawi, L.C. Dulger, S. Kapucu and J Braz, Online teaching of robotic arm by human–robot interaction: end effector force/torque sensing. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2018, 40: 437. 
[7] S. Kucuk and Z. Bingul, An off-line robot simulation toolbox, Comput. Appl. Engineering Educ. 2010, 18(1): 41–52.
[8] Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, S.-C. Effects of a peer competition-based mobile learning approach on students' affective domain exhibition in social studies courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2016, 47(6): 1217–1231.
[9] Z. Li, J. Han, Z. Wang and B. Cui, Force Control and Simulation Analysis of Robot Force Sensing Teaching, Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2019, 02: 246-248.
[10] J He, H C Zheng, F Gao, et al. Dynamics and control of a 7-DOF hybrid manipulator for capturing a non-cooperative target in space. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2019, 140: 83-103. 

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology
  
  
• Curriculum and Teaching Methodology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Adult and Higher Education